Section 141 - Judgment Search Results

National Small Industries Corp. Ltd. Vs. Harmeet Singh Paintal and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2010(2)SC161; 2010(2)SCALE372

..... he is clearly responsible for the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 therefore this court has distinguished the case of persons who are in charge of ..... accused was guilty of consent and connivance or negligence and therefore responsible under sub section 2 of section 141 of the act 25 from the above discussion the following principles emerge i the .....

K.K. Ahuja Vs. V.K. Vora and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR2897; 2009(4)BomCR558; [2009]152CompCas520(SC); JT2009(8)SC691; 2010(1)MPHT164; 2009(II)OLR(SC)292; RLW2009(9)SC2275; 2009(9)SCALE87; (2009)10SCC48; [2009]94SCL; 2009(4)LHSC2621

..... director manager secretary or other officer can be made liable under sub section 2 of section 141 but under sub section 1 of section 141 it is theoretically possible to make even a person who is ..... the company will not be sufficient to attract the constructive liability under section 141 of the act 12 sub section 2 of section 141 provides that a director manager secretary or other officer though not .....

Ramaswamy Athappan and anr. Vs. Bharti Infotel Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: II(2008)BC533; 2008BusLR522(Del); 148(2008)DLT79; 2008(101)DRJ426

..... he is clearly responsible for the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 emphasis supplied 14 the subsequent judgment in saroj kumar poddar was dealing with a ..... he is clearly responsible for the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 emphasis supplied 14 the subsequent judgment in saroj kumar poddar was dealing with a .....

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court: Chennai

..... is a company in terms of section 141 of the act section 141 of the act reads as follows section 141 offences by companies 1 if the ..... in my considered opinion going by the purpose for which section 138 and section 141 were brought into being by means of amendment to ..... does not reflect the intention of the legislature behind incorporation of section 141 to the act he would point out that chapter xvii .....

V.C. Anthony, Chairman, Bhageeratha Engineering Ltd., Vs. Citi Financi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(2008)BC430; 2008(102)DRJ40

..... the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 the matter was again considered in sabitha ramamurthy ..... diligence to prevent the commission of the offence sub section 2 of section 141 also roped in directors managers secretaries or other ..... the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 the matter was again considered in sabitha ramamurthy .....

Mymoonath Beevi Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(1)ALD(Cri)30; I(2006)BC489; [2006]131CompCas474(Ker); 2005(4)KLT174

..... for trial it needs no reiteration that proviso to sub section 1 of section 141 enables the accused to prove his innocence by discharging the ..... accused this would amount to a conduct falling under sub section 2 of section 141 18 in these cases we are concerned only with ..... contain the necessary averment falling either under sub section 1 or under sub section 2 of section 141 we are of the view that it .....

S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Neeta Bhalla and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: II(2007)BC521(SC); (2007)1CompLJ369(SC); 146(2008)DLT239(SC); (2007)3GLR2322(SC); 2007(2)JKJ1[SC]; JT2007(4)SC230; 2007(3)KLT672(SC); 2007(4)MhLj452; 2007MPLJ275(SC); 2007(4)SCC70; (2007)2SCC(Cri)192; (2007)2Crimes183(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)909

..... is clearly responsible for the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 the bench however referred the matter back to the division bench for ..... dishonour of cheque offence by company vicarious liability of director requirements under section 141 held under section 141 a director does not automatically become vicariously liable for offence committed by company .....

Ramrajsingh Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR213; [2009]152CompCas346(SC); 2009(5)SCALE670; (2009)6SCC729:2009AIRSCW3836:2009(3)LHSC1711

..... the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 14 the matter was again considered in sabitha ramamurthy ..... satisfied that there are averments which bring the case within section 141 he would issue the process we have seen that merely ..... satisfied that there are averments which bring the case within section 141 he would issue the process without this averment being made .....

S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Neeta Bhalla and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3512; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)595; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)1118; IV(2005)BC425(SC); 2005(3)BLJR2108; [2005]127CompCas563(SC); (2005)6CompLJ144(SC); 2005CriLJ4140; 2005(5)CTC65; 123

..... is concerned is clearly responsible for incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 section 33 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj power of central government to issue ..... he is clearly responsible for the incriminating act and will be covered under sub section 2 of section 141 17 the reference having been answered individual cases may be listed before appropriate bench .....

Aruna Kumari Vs. Dr. Ambrish Kumar Sengar

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(2)MPLJ104

..... to every procedure and proceeding before the court of civil jurisdiction 5 section 141 c p c is reproduced below section 141 miscellaneous proceedings the procedure provided in this code in regard to suits ..... thakur prasad 1890 12 all 179 it was held that independently of the explanation section 647 now section 141 did not apply to applications for execution but only to original matters in the .....