Skip to content


Section 14 Of The Impugned Act Which We Are Striking Down - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 14 of the impugned act which we are striking down Sorted by: old Court: sales tax tribunal stt west bengal Page 1 of about 218 results (4.033 seconds)
Apr 24 1989 (TRI)

indrol Lubricants and Vs. Inspector, Commercial Taxes and

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)77STC118Tribunal

1 this application under section 8 of the west bengal taxation tribunal act 1987 is west bengal sales tax act 1954 following seizure of the impugned goods which were brought by a truck without any permit under section 7 2 of the west bengal sales tax act 1954 following seizure of the impugned goods which were brought

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1989 (TRI)

Grand Smithy Works and Five ors. Vs. Certificate Officer and ors.

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)79STC414Tribunal

only came to know of these assessments when notices under section 7 of the bengal public demands recovery act were issued amounting to rs 35 701 44 the case no rn 14 relates to assessment and collection of tax dues and penalty is a registered dealer under the bengal finance sales tax act 1941 the firm did not furnish quarterly returns and pay

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1989 (TRI)

Shree Dayal Enterprise Vs. Commercial Tax Officer,

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)79STC137Tribunal

purpose of verifying whether the notified goods referred to in section 4a are being or have been transported in contravention of in sawn timber for the purpose of verification under section 14a of the bengal finance sales tax act 1941 no codified by the learned advocate appearing for the applicant that the impugned goods had not been seized at any point of time verification under section 14a of the bengal finance sales tax act 1941 no codified or standardised procedure could be shown to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1989 (TRI)

Ajoy Kumar Madhgoria and ors. Vs. West Bengal Commercial Taxes

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)79STC325Tribunal

the materials before him as to whether the claim under section 5 2 a ii of the bengal finance sales tax applicant of being heard 8 the application accordingly succeeds the impugned order passed by the west bengal commercial taxes tribunal is 5 2 a ii of the bengal finance sales tax act 1941 claimed for rs 3 79 012 75 on this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 1989 (TRI)

Hooghly Extrusions and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer,

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1993)88STC517Tribunal

1 this is an application under section 8 of the west bengal taxation tribunal act 1987 filed infirmities and compliance with the requirements of law was ensured 14 this view is in conformity with the construction of sub sales tax rules 1941 made under bengal finance sales tax act 1941 as a newly set up small scale industry for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 1989 (TRI)

indus Airconditioning Private Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Chichira

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)78STC72Tribunal

notification no 1319 ft dated april 19 1984 issued under section 4a of the same act 2 the applicant manufactures car maximum rate of tax and by a letter dated april 14 1982 the public relations officer of the office of the were goods notified under section 4a of the said 1941 act hence this application challenging the seizure and penalty 3 the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1989 (TRI)

Sima Banerjee and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)76STC241Tribunal

revision is still admittedly pending clauses a and b of section 8 3 of the said act actually codify the principles of the government of west bengal on or before the 14th march 1983 in commissioner of sales tax v auraiya chamber march 31 1985 we set aside the assistant commissioner s impugned order of march 8 1989 we further direct the assistant has also come before us on a new cause of action i e the second rejection order and hence is not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 1989 (TRI)

Kingsway and Co. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Central

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)76STC119Tribunal

assessed to tax and there could be no breach of section 16 1 b it cannot be said that the later the applicants in rn 290 t of 1989 and rn 146 t of 1989 and mr sumit kumar chakraborty adopted mr return in respect of all kinds of taxes under the act if in such a return an item of tax payable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 1989 (TRI)

Satyanarayan Bagla Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1990)78STC427Tribunal

21 2 does not expressly exclude the application of the section 5 of the limitation act although it may perhaps be exclude the application of the section 5 of the limitation act although it may perhaps be contended that the application is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1989 (TRI)

Sarada Plywood Industries Vs. C.T.O., Colootola Charge and ors.

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in : (1993)Supp(88)SCC539

sub clause i and also that of no person in section 4b of the act and sought to establish by a security would be unjustified and arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india nor can it be considered application under section 8 of the west bengal taxation tribunal act and numbered rn 38 t of 1989 2 the case

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //