Section 134 - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... can be issued under the act is laid down in section 4 section 5 sub section 1 provides for making of an application for issue of ..... the guarantees under articles 21 19 and 14 is the impugned section 10 especially section 10 3 c capable of circumscription to make it accord with ..... power must rarely hide its heart in an open society and system 134 i now skip article 14 since i agree fully with all that .....

Md. ShahabuddIn Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE204; (2010)4SCC653

..... the inquiry into and trial of rape or an offence under section 376 section 376a section 376b section 376c or section 376d of the indian penal code shall be conducted in camera provided that the ..... the appearance of justice and thus help to maintain public confidence in the judicial system 134 in gannett co inc v danial a depasquale 1979 443 u s 368 the defendants .....

Chinna Jeeyangar Mutt, Thirupathi Vs. C.V. Purushotham and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1974AP175

..... by the act 1 of 1929 21 dealing with the scope of section 134 b his lordship ganjendragadkar c j has observed in srinivasa v ..... type of suits by virtue of the provisions contained in section 31 if section 31 is interpreted to take away the right of suits ..... 134 c and articles 48 a and 48 b came to be inserted in the first schedule to the limitation act by amending act 1 of 1929 at the same time section .....

Manugraph India Limited, A Company Vs. Simarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. a ...

Court: Mumbai

..... i that the supreme court recognise that an additional forum had been provided under section 62 2 and section 134 2 of the trade marks act 1999 by including the district court within whose ..... nothing else neither cause of action nor any of the defendants the plaintiff cannot invoke section 134 2 or section 62 2 to drag the defendant to that distant location that following the decision .....

M/s. RSPL Ltd. Vs. Mukesh Sharma and Another

Court: Delhi

..... act 1957 as the case may be by taking advantage of the provisions of section 134 2 or section 62 2 respectively both the latter provisions are in pari materia under these provisions ..... subordinate branch officeplace where cause of action aroseplace where plaintiff can additionally sue under section 134 2 and section 62 2 1a ca2abaa3abbb4abca emphasis supplied 53 the only aspect on which i respectfully .....

Saregama India Limited Vs. Whackedout Media Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Court: Kolkata

..... c a b place where plaintiff can additional ly sue under section 134 2 and section 62 2 a a b4a b c a 22 let us ..... anxious consideration of the 18 provisions contained in section 20 cpc section 62 of the copyright act and section 134 of the trade marks act and the ..... required to be taken into consideration in invoking a jurisdiction under section 134 2 of the trademark act and 62 2 of the copyright .....

Behari Lal and ors. Vs. Muhammad Muttaki

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1989)ILR20All482

..... limited period outside of it 3 whatever interpretation is put upon the word purchase in section 134 this much is plain that the effecting of such purchase creates ipso facto an actionable ..... upon which they were excluded from the operations of section 10 are apparently the same i am accordingly of opinion that article 134 is as much applicable to a suit against a .....

Wipro Limited, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate Rep. by Its Legal Manager ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2008Mad165; 2008(3)CTC724; LC2008(2)466; (2008)3MLJ1; 2008(37)PTC269(Mad)

..... mark and c suit for passing off in view of sub section 1 of section 134 all the above three types of suits are to be instituted ..... he resides or carries on business this privilege is conferred by section 134 2 with a non abstante clause by using the phrase notwithstanding anything ..... clause 12 of the letters patent into a case covered by section 134 2 of the trade marks act 1999 the non abstante clause .....

Sukh Dev Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court: Rajasthan

..... in view of the legislative intend and clear provision of section 134 1 as well as the nature of the orders which ..... procedure amendment act 1976 provides as follows explanation in this section the expression proceedings includes proceedings under order ix but does ..... in the proceedings before civil court and that amendment in section 115 narrowed the high court s jurisdiction in entertaining revision .....

Ultratech Cement Ltd. and Another Vs. Dalmia Cement Bharat Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

..... of the code of civil procedure or at any rate the principle behind that section into section 134 2 of the trade marks act 1999 the rival contentions between the parties really center ..... wholly outside the territorial jurisdiction of this court this court would still have jurisdiction under section 134 2 even if such plaintiff only had his subordinate office and not his principal office .....