Section 129 - Judgment Search Results

Abbas Ali Shikdar Vs. Karim Bakhsh Shikdar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.466

..... that it comes within the operation of section 129 of the transfer of property act that section lays down that nothing in the chapter ..... that they were sales they must come within the provisions of section 54 of the transfer of property act that they are sales ..... us to follow from the definition given in that section and besides the section the following authorities may be cited namely macnaghten s .....

Kandhia Lal Vs. Manki

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.143

..... surety bond given under the circumstances stated is a continuing guarantee within the meaning of section 129 of the contract act and may be revoked in regard to future transactions by the ..... dismiss the appeal with costs probate and administration act v of 1881 section 78 contract act ix of 1872 section 129 administration bond with surety whether surety can cancel surety bond power of .....

Kandhya Lal Vs. Manki

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1909)ILR31All56

..... surety bond given under the circumstances stated is a continuing guarantee within the meaning of section 129 of the contract act and may be revoked in regard to future transactions by the ..... with costs act no v of 1881 probate and administration act section 78 act no ix of 1872 indian contract act section 129 administration surety continuing guarantee cantonments act c a no 41 .....

Mccabe and Steen Construction Co. Vs. Wilson

Court: US Supreme Court

u s 529 120 u s 530 robertson v perkins 129 u s 233 129 u s 236 bogk v gassert

Winters Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

201 brewster v wakefield 22 how 118 63 u s 129 milner v meek 95 u s 252 basket v hassell

Rangappa Naik Vs. Kamti Naik and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ309

decision in vinayak v govtnd i l r 1900 b 129 and ramphal rai v tala kuari i l r 1883

Miller and Lux, Inc. Vs. East Side Canal and Irrig. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consideration we hold that the suit was properly dismissed under the fifth section of the act of 1875 as one in which the nevada ..... acquired with the purpose of establishing a permanent domicil morris v gilmer 129 u s 315 where the complainant corporation was organized for the ..... of suit and not fictitious or pretended morris v gilmer 129 u s 315 129 u s 328 in that case the question was whether .....

Richardson Vs. Shaw

Court: US Supreme Court

..... creditor is defined to include anyone who owns a demand or claim provable in bankruptcy sec 1 sub 9 bankruptcy act 1898 3 u s comp st 3419 it is essential ..... was said by mr justice bradley speaking for the court in galigher v jones 129 u s 193 129 u s 198 a broker is but an agent and is bound to .....

Southern Pine Lumber Co. Vs. Ward

Court: US Supreme Court

laws of texas temple was an page 208 u s 129 incorporator and became its president in november 1894 in the

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

and mr justice bradley in bartemeyer v iowa 18 wall 129 and in butchers union company v crescent city company 111