Section 111 - Year 2002 - Judgments

Oct 11 2002 (TRI)

Manoj Agarwal Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-11-2002

Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC236

..... concealment in the steel scrap is liable for confiscation under section 111 d 111 j 111 i amp 111 m of the customs act qty 40 40 m ..... prescribed agencies in exim policy were liable for confiscation under section 111 d 111 j 111 i and 111 m of the customs act qty 12 84 m t ..... be held to be liable for confiscation under section 111 d 111 j 111 i amp 111 m or and section 119 of the customs act 1962 f since .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(105)LC902Tri(Bang.)alore

..... s lakshmi watches pvt ltd are liable to confiscation under section 111 d 111 o 111 p of the customs act iv whether the order passed ..... reason to uphold the confiscation under section 111 d g once the liability for confiscation under section 111 o 111 d 111 p of the customs act is ..... 28 31 250 now under seizure should not be confiscated under section 111 o 111 p of customs act 1962 iv the 4896 nos of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2002 (TRI)

Kothari Filaments Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Apr-19-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC758Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the whole consignment of tetracycline and lithopone is liable to confiscation under section 111 d and 111 m read with section 119 of the customs act 1962 the commissioner thereafter passed the following ..... the present case would also be clearly against the mandate of the relevant sections of the customs act section 111 of the customs act mandates that imported goods attracting the various clauses .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC95

..... s lakshmi watches pvt ltd are liable to confiscation under section 111 d 111 o 111 p of the customs act iv whether the order passed ..... reason to uphold the confiscation under section 111 d g once the liability for confiscation under section 111 o 111 d 111 p of the customs act is ..... 28 31 250 now under seizure should not be confiscated under section 111 o 111 p of customs act 1962 iv the 4896 nos of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 2002 (TRI)

Cc Vs. Ashish International (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-29-2002

Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC180

..... leviable thereon and therefore the goods were liable to confiscation under sections 111 d 111 f 111 1 and 119 of the customs act 1962 9 on the ..... of rs 35 04 800 00 should not be confiscated under section 111 d 111 f and 111 1 ibid the importers sh p k jain and sh r ..... valued at rs 16 96 780 cif should not be confiscated under sections 111 d 111 f and 119 of the customs act 1962 b the seized tungsten .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2002 (TRI)

Exotic Fashions Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-03-2002

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT173TriDel

..... of commission omission has rendered the goods liable for confiscation and accordingly penalty under section 111 o of the customs act is imposable the learned sdr reiterated the findings of ..... duty exemption entitlement certificate in respect of the value quantity description quality and technical characteristics section 111 o of the customs act provides that the goods brought from a place outside .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2002 (TRI)

Marmo Classic Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Ep),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-29-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC205Tri(Mum.)bai

..... proper and based on the above conclusions held the liability of the confiscation under section 111 d and section 111 o for importing the said block unauthorisedly the appellant company was held liable for ..... the findings of the learned commissioner regarding the liability for confiscation of the goods under section 111 d of the customs act 1962 5 as regards the confiscation of the goods arrived .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Lady Amphthil Nurses Instns and Vs. Cc, Chennai and Cc, Cochin

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC630

..... which the appellants obtained exemption from payment of customs duty and therefore the terms of section 111 o enable the customs authorities to investigate it was contended by the counsels for revenue ..... which the appellants obtained exemption from payment of customs duty and therefore the terms of section 111 o enable the customs authorities to investigate examining those rulings of the apex court we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2002 (TRI)

Ashok Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2002

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT186TriDel

..... the goods in question were liable to confiscation under section 111 d clause d of section 111 reads as under d any goods which are ..... dealt with goods which were allegedly liable to confiscation under section 111 d of the customs act the proposal was contested in ..... already noted apart from absolutely confiscating the seized goods under section 111 d of the act hence the present appeal 4 reiterating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2002 (TRI)

Ashok Kumar Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2002

Reported in: (2003)(86)ECC321

..... the goods in question were liable to confiscation under section 111 d clause d of section 111 reads as under d any goods which are ..... dealt with goods which were allegedly liable to confiscation under section 111 d of the customs act the proposal was contested in ..... already noted apart from absolutely confiscating the seized goods under section 111 d of the act hence the present appeal 4 reiterating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Section 111 - Judgment Search Results