Section 102 - Judgment Search Results

Esmail Ebrahim Vs. Haji Jan Mahomed

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR904

..... absence his suit had been called on and dismissed under section 102 of the code it was held refusing the application that ..... generally recognize it as such civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 section 103 suit default of appearance no appearance by counsel dismissal ..... whereupon the suit was dismissed the plaintiff then applied under section 103 of the civil procedure code for the restoration of the suit .....

Esmail Ebrahim Vs. Haji Jan Mahomed

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR1172

..... appeal against the decree dismissing his suit 4 in our view sections 102 and 103 of the code do not apply because the ..... the allocatur served within three weeks civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 sections 102 103 and 117 suit dismis sal of for absence of ..... not able to appear return of brief by junior counsel practice sections 102 and 103 civil procedure code do not apply when the plaintiff is present .....

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

court has never attempted to define page 211 u s 102 with precision the words due process of law it is

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Mottley

Court: US Supreme Court

152 u s 459 chappell v waterworth 155 u s 102 155 u s 107 postal telegraph cable company v alabama

Wabash R. Co. Vs. Adelbert College

Court: US Supreme Court

v lavender 21 wall 276 people s bank v calhoun 102 u s 256 barton v barbour 104 u s 126

Missouri Valley Land Co. Vs. Wrich

Court: US Supreme Court

s 250 1908 missouri valley land company v wrich no 102 argued january 10 1908 decided february 3 1908 208 u

Bahadur Ali Vs. Ram Lal and Ismail Khan

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All372

qurban husain v chote 1899 i l r 22 all 102 at p 104 lies at the root of the law

Ex Parte Young

Court: US Supreme Court

..... therefore before the ratification of that amendment the restrictions embodied in the section were therefore but a partial accomplishment of the more comprehensive result effectuated ..... 79 183 u s 99 183 u s 100 183 u s 102 are very apt at page 183 u s 100 he stated do ..... him to extravagant and unreasonable loss again at page 183 u s 102 he says it is doubtless true that the state may impose penalties .....

Hairston Vs. Danville and Western Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as has been shown by a discriminating writer 1 lewis on eminent domain 2d ed sec 157 the decisions have been rested on different grounds some cases proceed upon the express ..... railway v morehouse 112 wis 1 railway v petty 57 ark 369 zircle v railway 102 va 17 the uses for which the track was desired are not the less public .....

Prentis Vs. Atlantic Coast Line Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... may be that when an appeal is taken to the supreme court of appeals this section will be held to apply and the appeal be declared too late we express no ..... views of the supreme court of appeals itself atlantic coast line ry co v commonwealth 102 va 599 621 they are implied page 211 u s 228 in many cases in .....