Second Sight - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: second sight Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 28,731 results (0.181 seconds)Wipro Ge Medical Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus., Bangalore
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT393Tri(Bang.)
57 95 cus while the items are identical the terms sight saving equipments have been omitted the new notfn also covered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShahjad Vs. Virendra Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
Reported in: III(2003)ACC562
in any case there is serious damage to the eye sight in the absence of statement by doctor as to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarender Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ222
..... but it cannot undo the case of the complainant party 25 the second aspect of this case is regarding motive the story of the prosecution ..... of his father in order to visit him we also cannot lose sight of the fact that richhpal kaur is the injured stamped witness therefore ..... of the learned counsel is devoid of any merit we cannot lose sight of the fact that amar kaur and richhpal kaur are two injured .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhey Shyam Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-23-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ165; [2001(91)FLR991]
and the prohibited quantity of ganja was recovered in their sight and presence first of all it is noteworthy that neither
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Transport Corporation Vs. Rajbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2002
Reported in: 100(2002)DLT111; 2003(2)SLJ102(Delhi)
..... his pay and other service benefits needs to be protected the second proviso appended to section 47 of the act in no ..... bus drivers on the ground of their defective or subnormal eye sight developed during the course of the employment has been examined ..... safeguards because such bus drivers have developed defective eye sight or subnormal eye sight because of the occupational hazards a scheme was directed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Niwas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-13-2002
..... court in mohd ramzan khan supra which read as with the forty second amendment the delinquent officer is not associated with the disciplinary inquiry ..... the case at hand all these aspects of thematter were lost sight of by the disciplinary authority and the penalty of dismissal was ..... prejudice caused to the delinquent is too glaring to be lost sight of in the case at hand the prejudice caused to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri N.B. Gungarakoppa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-10-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3311
..... the statute book the dual concurrency jurisdiction provision for good purpose secondly it has been the sad experience of the high court that ..... has been very validly and genuinely invoked the courts cannot lose sight of the situations in which abuses may be prevalent mr jadhav ..... anticipatory bail application even in the first instance we cannot lose sight of the fact that section 438 cr p c if one .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, Amritsar Vs. Bagga Singh and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC599; JT2002(10)SC538; (2003)1SCC619
..... passages from the holy granth the former is called katha and the second is called kirtan a sikh thus worships the holy words that are ..... the tribunal was not proper it also noticed that the tribunal lost sight of the fact that sarna ram was udasi and the decisions referred ..... the presumption under section 18 1 g of the act were lost sight of the entries showing that sarna ram acquired the property by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubli Hajam S/O Ali Hajam Vs. State
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-29-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ281,2003(1)JKJ136
to expose his private part and ran away on the sight of the girl s uncle the offence under section 354
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.T.V. Dhinakaran Vs. Dy. Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-17-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Mad59; 2003(85)ECC153; (2002)3MLJ587
..... by contending that the petitioner board and the appellate tribunal the second respondent therein are parts of a composite body and that ..... am of the view that those provisions cannot be lost sight while considering the validity of the insolvency notice as stated ..... argument has been advanced by the learned additional solicitor general by sighting decisions arise under wealth tax act and income tax act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial