Skip to content


Sec - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: sec Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 314 results (0.104 seconds)
Nov 02 2015 (HC)

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-02-2015

..... 44 the application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms dasti companies act 1956 euro ldquo section 391 1 euro ldquo scheme of amalgamation euro ldquo requirement of meetings euro ldquo applicant ..... companies filed application under section 391 1 of the act seeking directions of the court to dispense with requirement of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-2015

..... a token 59 it has been submitted by the applicants that no proceedings under sections 237 243 250 250a and 251 of the companies act 1956 or under ..... sections 210 214 215 216 1 216 3 216 4 217 219 220 223 224 ..... 1 this joint application has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act 1956 by the applicant companies seeking directions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-2015

..... it has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the companies act 1956 are pending against ..... its members creditors or public interest as per second proviso of section 394 1 of the companies act 1956 15 in response ..... consequently sanction is hereby granted to the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the companies act 1956 the petitioner companies .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2015 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Tiwary Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr Sec Hom and Others

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-06-2015

sasaram bihar petitioner versus 1 the state of jharkhand through secretary department of home government of jharkhand ranchi 2 director general

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 2015 (HC)

S. Santhi Vs. The Principal, KSR Mat. Hr. Sec. School, Namakkal Distri ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2015

prayer petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2015 (HC)

Surendra Kumar Kanwat Vs. Union of India Thru. Sec. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-26-2015

dr d y chandrachud c j 1 the special appeal is from a judgment of the learned single judge dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2015 (HC)

K.Madhava Krishna,s/O K.Suryanarayana Vs. Govt of a.P., Reptd by Its P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-12-2015

suryanarayana petitioner govt of a p reptd by its principal secretary fisheries hyderabad and three others respondents counsel for the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 2015 (HC)

Praveen Kumbhat Sec. Jod. and Anr Vs. State and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Dec-07-2015

..... was under the authority of the collector available to him under the first proviso to section 89 1 read with condition no 4 of the permission dated 1 5 2003 granted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2015 (SC)

D.N. Jeevaraj Vs. Chief Sec., Govt. of Karnataka and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-27-2015

..... was to be used for commercial purposes attention was drawn to section 310 of the karnataka municipal corporations act 1976 2 which provided ..... was not pressed nor is it an issue before us 2 section 310 completion certificate and permission to occupy or use 1 ..... permission to occupy the building 1a notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 1 where permission is granted to any person for erection .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 2015 (HC)

The Section Officer, O and M Division, HESCOM Athani Taluk, Belgaum Di ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jun-11-2015

..... present case the unfortunate incident occurred on the snapping of 11 kv electrical wire 7 sections 53 and 68 of the electricity act 2003 for short the act and rule 91 ..... is not exorbitant 14 for the foregoing reasons the appeal is dismissed electricity act 2003 section 53 section 68 comparative citation 2015 4 kantlj 643

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //