Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ77CAT
..... khan and anr. v. gangadharan and ors. . hon'ble apex court held: a clarification was subsequently issued on 29.7.1993 to the effect that scheduled caste/scheduled tribe candidates who have been promoted on their own merit and seniority should not be counted as reserved candidates and this has been the declaration of law made ..... scslj 10 wherein it was held by hon'ble apex court in para 12 observed: undoubtedly, article 16 (4) enables the government to make reservations for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes either at the initial stage of recruitment or at the stage of promotion. this court in case of c.a. rajendran v. union of india and ..... : underthe existing instructions, vacancy based rosters have been prescribed in order to implement the government's policy relating to the reservation of jobs for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. the application of reservation on the basis of these rosters was called in the question before the courts. the constitution bench of the supreme .....
Tag this Judgment!