Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders amendment act 2002 section 3 amendment of scheduled castes ordre Page 9 of about 1,147 results (0.239 seconds)

Jul 01 2003 (HC)

Bayyapureddy Appala Naidu Vs. Agent to Government and Collector and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD279

..... they are valmikis, which is recognized as scheduled tribe under the scheduled tribes order, is concerned, this court is of the considered opinion that having regard to the scheduled tribes order as well as the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (amendment) order, 1956, ex-facie, valmikis are recognized as scheduled tribes in andhra pradesh only with effect from ..... to be valmikis, as valmiki community was notified as scheduled tribe for the purpose of the scheduled tribes order with effect from 25.9.1956 by reason of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1956, the 3rd respondent family cannot be treated as scheduled tribes as on that date. thus, section 3 of ..... filed the counter-affidavit on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, states that the land in question originally belongs to lothas family, who belong to bagata caste, a scheduled tribe. they sold the land to batchala family in the year 1951, who, in turn, sold the property to the petitioner. according to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1991 (HC)

Chikkathimmegowda Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3238; 1992(1)KarLJ229

..... registered sale deeds in favour of the petitioner and since then he has been in possession and enjoyment of that extent of land. after coming into force of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (the act for short), respondent-3, son of the original grantee, made an application before the assistant commissioner for reliefs ..... no. 3 of 1984 with effect from 3-3-1984 reads: '5a. appeal to the deputy commissioner - any person aggrieved by an order passed after the commencement of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) (amendment) act, 1984 by the assistant commissioner to take possession of land under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1990 (SC)

Srish Kumar Choudhury Vs. State of Tripura and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC991; JT1990(2)SC27; 1990LabIC707; 1990Supp(1)SCC220; [1990]1SCR576; 1990(2)LC16(SC)

..... tripuri, tippera.16. jamatia17. noatia18. riang7. following the reorganisation act (37 of 1956), the ministry of home affairs on october 29, 1956, notified the list of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. in respect of the then union territory of tripura the same communities were relisted. then came the north-eastern area (reorganisation) act (81 of 1971) which ..... to. a constitution bench in the case of b. basavalingappa v. d. munichinnappa : [1965]1scr316 examined the provisions of article 341 which contained similar provisions for the scheduled castes with reference to an election dispute. wanchoo, j. spoke for the constitution bench thus:clause (1) provides that the president may with respect to any state, after ..... not for us to examine it and come to a conclusion that if a person was in fact a mochi, he could still claim to belong to the scheduled caste of chamars and be allowed to contest an election on that basis.13. in kishorilal ham v. raja ram singh and ors., : [1972]2scr632 a two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2008 (SC)

Raju Ramsing Vasave Vs. Mahesh Deorao Bhivapurkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3951(SC); 2008(56)BLJR2851; JT2008(9)SC445; (2008)8MLJ47(SC); 2008(12)SCALE252; (2008)9SCC54; 2008(2)LC1057(SC); 2008(5)LH(SC)3645; 2008AIRSCW6184

..... upon an enquiry to determine whether a section of ezhavas/thiyyas which was called thandan in the malabar area of the state was excluded from the benefits of the scheduled castes order.in addl. general manager - human resource, bharat heavy electrieals ltd. v. suresh ramkrishna burde : air2007sc2048 , this court held:14. in the case ..... samrakshna samithi and in particular paras 18 and 19 thereof, which read as under: (scc p.365)18. these judgments leave no doubt that the scheduled castes order has to be applied as it stands and no enquiry can be held or evidence let in to determine whether or not some particular community falls ..... educational institution, but relates to securing employment by wrongly claiming the benefit of reservation meant for schedule tribes. when a person secures employment by making a false claim regarding caste/tribe, he deprives a legitimate candidate belonging to scheduled caste/tribe, of employment. in such a situation, the proper course is to cancel the employment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2005 (HC)

Chandra Naik Vs. Paivalikke Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT843

..... of events and defeating the concept envisaged and the pattern devised in the constitution and the statute with respect to the percentage of reservation of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes on the basis of population, in the structural edifice of the panchayat raj institutions. the inevitable consequence would be to dereserve the presidentship ..... disqualify or unseat a candidate elected on the basis of the proportional constitutional reservation due to a subsequent removal of a particular community from the scheduled caste or scheduled tribe list on account of the exercise of power under article 342(2) of the constitution, appears based on firmer foundations and rooted on ..... available to the particular member cannot be taken away during the above span of 5 years. it was also contended that reservation to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes envisaged under the constitution vide article 243d and section 153(3)(a) of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 conceived and implemented at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2005 (HC)

Vijay Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC649

..... of india alone which is competent to amend the said orders, following the procedure prescribed in articles 341 and 342 of the constitution. once the president of india issued the scheduled castes/scheduled tribes order in relation to a state in exercise of the powers under article 341(1) and 342(1) of the constitution, even the president cannot include or exclude any ..... can amend the said order by law. the courts are also devoid of any power to include or exclude, to vary or substitute or declare any person to be a scheduled caste or scheduled tribes. the purpose of enacting the provisions of articles 341 and 342 seems to be uplifting certain classes of the society who have been depressed, oppressed and suffered from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2009 (HC)

Selvi M. Shyamala Vs. Tamil Nadu State Scrutiny Committee Rep. by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ278

..... narain, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's paternal grand father and father belonged to hindu adi dravidar community of schedule caste. however, her paternal grand father got converted to christianity, but as persons belonging to adi dravidar community, they were living only with the said ..... herein has preferred this writ petition.3. according to the petitioner, her father and paternal grand father originally belonged to hindu adi dravidar community of schedule caste. her paternal grand father got converted to christianity, however, her father and grand father were living only with hindu adi dravidar people in a ..... certificate issued by the thasildar, polur taluk vide no. 1363595, dated 01.09.1998, stating that she belongs to hindu adi dravidar community of scheduled caste, was cancelled by the district level vigilance committee, tirvannamalai. aggrieved by which, the petitioner filed an appeal before the tamil nadu state scrutiny committee, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1979 (SC)

Dadaji Alias Dina Vs. Sukhdeobabu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC150; (1980)1SCC621; [1980]1SCR1135; 1980(12)LC26(SC)

..... statement of objects and reasons dated may 12, 1976 attached to the bill, it was stated as follows :-under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders some communities have been specified as scheduled castes or as scheduled tribes only in certain areas of the state concerned and not in respect of the whole state. this has been causing ..... in a state are, however, being excluded if there were no returns in respect of these communities in the censuses of 1961 and 1971...thereafter the scheduled castes, and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 (act no. 108 of 1976) was passed by the parliament and it had come into force before the election in ..... kshatriya bidwaik mana' community. he further contended that the 'mana' community to which he belonged had been included in that entry after the schedule to the order was amended by the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976.4. in order to appreciate the rival contentions, it is necessary to make a brief survey of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2012 (HC)

Nimmaka Jaya Raju Vs. Janardhana That Raj Veera Vara Thodaramala and O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... minority view in the decision, of the candidate in question raising himself to the position of kshatriya depriving himself of the membership of his scheduled caste or schedule tribe. 54. then came election petition no.13 of 1983 decided on 16-01-1984 challenging the election of satrucherla vijaya rama raju alleging that ..... filed a petition before the district collector, vizianagaram to enquire into the social status of the mother of the 1st respondent under the andhra pradesh (scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and backward classes) regulation of issue of community certificate act, 1993 and rules 1997 and the petitioner filed w.p. no.27217 of 2008 ..... officer (1984 (supp.) scc 77)had the returned candidate obtaining the certificate after inclusion of konda reddy community in the list of scheduled tribes by the amendment of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (order) act, 1976. in all other documents, the community of the returned candidate and the family was described as hindu reddy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 1997 (HC)

Suhas Babanrao Shewale Vs. the Chairman, Stc Scrutiny Committee and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR454

..... facts are that the petitioner claims to be a member of 'halba' tribe, which is a scheduled tribe declared under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976 in its ii schedule at item no. 19 of maharashtra state. the petitioner after passing his 12th standard examination sought ..... admission to the engineering college, pune against the reserved quota for the candidates belonging to the scheduled tribe. as per the rules framed by the slate government, the petitioner's caste ..... the legality and validity of the order dated 14th july, 1986 passed by the scheduled tribes certificate scrutiny committee ('scrutiny committee' for short) directing cancellation and confiscation of the petitioner's caste certificate as belonging to 'halba' tribe as well as the decision of the additional .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //