Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders amendment act 2002 section 3 amendment of scheduled castes ordre Page 10 of about 1,147 results (0.165 seconds)

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

S. Anandhan Vs. The Secretary, Election Commission of India, New Delhi ...

Court : Chennai

..... further re-adjustment of division of each state into territorial constituencies or re-determination of constituencies to be reserved for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. 16. the respondents also pleaded that the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976 has nothing to do with the present exercise, as that act was to ..... provide for the inclusion or exclusion from the lists of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, and of certain castes and tribes, and for the re-adjustment of representation of parliamentary and assembly constituencies insofar as such re-adjustment was necessitated by such ..... seats in the house of the people or the total number of seats to be assigned to the legislative assembly with reservation for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and the delimitation of constituencies. it was the will of parliament that the commission could by order publish its proposals which were to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2015 (HC)

Eliyappadam Sivarajan and Another Vs. Prabhakaran

Court : Kerala

..... alienated lands) act, 1975. though the learned counsel for the appellants conceded that mala panicker was included in the list of scheduled tribes only by virtue of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe orders (amendment) act 2002, relying on the decision of the orissa high court in bijay kumar jally v. member, ..... the courts below that 'mala panicker' community was included in the scheduled tribe as per scheduled caste and scheduled tribe orders (amendment) act 2002 and hence mala panicker community did not belong to scheduled tribe prior to 2002 is correct? (ii) whether the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe orders (amendment) act 2002 and the inclusion of 'mala panicker ..... ' community as a scheduled tribe will have retrospective effect and if so, is not ext.a1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1996 (HC)

Gopal S/O Jianna Madrewar Vs. Poshatti S/O Bhojanna Khurd

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR295

..... that though the respondents belong to mannerwarlu caste, the said caste initially was not included in the list of the scheduled tribes, and to be precise on the date of the transaction. it is an admitted position now that mannerwarlu caste has been recognized as scheduled tribe in state of maharashtra by virtue of the provisions of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act 1976, which came ..... into effect on 27th day of july, 1977. before the said date, mannerwarlu was not the caste included in the scheduled tribes list and till then andh, bhil, gond, kolam .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2007 (HC)

Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Senior Division ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR204]

..... the said employee by one shri ram lal bhai, m.l.a. that the said employee belonged to shilpkar community, which is recognized as a scheduled caste under the scheduled castes/tribes order (amendment) act, 19561 the said certificate had been endorsed by the additional district magistrate and the same had been submitted by the said ..... the tehsildar sadar, gorakhpur, it was evident that shri shiv kumar sharma, son of shri abhi raj sharma, resident of bashratpur was a shilpkar by caste which belongs to scheduled caste. the district harijan and social welfare officer, gorakhpur has affirmed the said finding vide his report dated 13.12.1988.on further enquiry, the district ..... correctness of the certificate and there is no specific finding that the certificate had been obtained by misrepresentation or fraud or he did not belong to the scheduled caste. the inquiry officer committed an error in placing the onus to prove that the report of the district magistrate was wrong, on the respondent employee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1982 (HC)

Buta Ram Azad and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H230

..... jatis were included wrongly in this order.5. no other point was urged.6. for the reasons recorded., i hold that the constitution (scheduled castes) order. 1950 is not ultra vires of the constitution and it does not infringe any provision of the constitution but i am of the view ..... backward, arising out of tradition practice of untouchability, they could not be included in the list of the scheduled castes. they could only be included in the list of scheduled tribes. the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 cannot be declared as ultra vires of the constitution merely on the ground that the vimukat ..... it is stated that the following criteria was adopted for declaring a community either as a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe :--(a) scheduled castes : extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising our of traditional practice of untouchability. (b) scheduled tribes :--indications of primitive traits, distinctive culture, geographical isolation, shyness of contacts with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1996 (SC)

Heikham Surchandra Singh and ors. Vs. Representative of lois Kakching, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)53; JT1996(10)SC442; 1996(8)SCALE407; (1997)2SCC523; [1996]Supp7SCR371

..... constitution, had issued scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order, 1950 'lois' was declared as scheduled caste but not throughout the state. it was amended by the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (amendment) act, 1956 (53 of 1956) and scheduled castes scheduled tribes (amendment) act, 1976. consequently, 'lois' came to be declared as a scheduled caste for the purpose ..... consideration from government for the amelioration for their condition. i am, therefore, of opinion that they should be included in the list of scheduled castes.14. i. sheshimeran aier, regional assistant commissioner after recording evidence had stated in 1953 thus:the term 'lois' means backward class. there ..... therefore the certificate issued by him in favour of rameshwar singh is invalid. there is no dispute that the competent authorities to issue scheduled castes certificate are district magistrate, sub divisional magistrate, etc. and not the government of manipur. therefore, the district magistrate could not issue .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1996 (HC)

Rakesh Sharma Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the parliament on 8th september, 1976. the object of the act was to provide for inclusion and exclusion from the list of 'scheduled castes' and 'scheduled tribes' of certain castes and tribes, for the readjustment of representation of parliament and assembly constituencies insofar as such readjustment is necessitated by such inclusion or exclusion ..... the hon'ble supreme court surveyed the retrograde attempts successfully made by different communities in the country to wear the mask of status either of scheduled castes or schedule tribes to secure constitutional benefits of reservations and other economic empowerments and those attempts in andhra pradesh were judicially negated in the said case. ..... '.46. for the reasons stated above, i come to the following conclusions:(i) lohara are not covered by entry 22 part iii of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976;(ii) in the hindi version of the act lohar has been inadvertanly mentioned and in view of conflict between .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1985 (HC)

Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Dasari Subbayamma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986AP154

..... of the constitution permits the state to make special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. similarly, art. 16(4) permits the state to make a provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any ..... under the said clause shall not be varied by any subsequent notification.' accordingly, the president of india has issued the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950. the order, as amended by the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976, being central act no. 108 of 1976, reads as follows :-- 'in exercise of ..... has, fortunately, not percolated into these tribes or tribal communities. these tribes are entirely outside the caste system, even distinct and apart from the scheduled castes which too are outside the four-tiered caste system.we shall now briefly refer to certain characteristics, customs and practices which mark-off the goudus (tribesmen) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (SC)

E.V. Chinnaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC162; 2005(1)ALD102(SC); 2004(5)CTC426; 2005(3)ESC426; [2005(2)JCR204(SC)]; JT2005(11)SC482; (2005)1MLJ79(SC); 2004(9)SCALE316; (2005)1SCC394; 2005(2)SLJ388(SC)

..... to the weaker of the weakest it had become necessary to enact the impugned law. the learned counsel submitted that by re- grouping the castes in the scheduled caste list there is no reclassification or micro classification as contended by the appellants. 10. some other counsels also argued that neither article 341 nor ..... such appointments and under article 15(4) of the constitution there is an obligation on the state to make special provisions for the advancement of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and what the state has sought to do under the impugned act was only to make such a provisions to fulfil the constitutional obligation ..... the arguments addressed on behalf of the appellant is that allotting a separate percentage of reservation from amongst the total reservation allotted to the scheduled castes to different groups amongst the scheduled castes amounted to depriving one class of the benefits of such reservation at least partly. it is also argued that the impugned legislation was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1987 (HC)

Gujarat Dalit Civil and Constitutional Rights Pratipadan Samiti and Et ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1988Guj197; (1988)1GLR290

..... in the district of dangs and umbergaon taluka (which is now apart of bulsar district) can properly be considered to be the members of scheduled caste and whether the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act. 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the amendment act') in so far it deleted the entry 'in the ..... it is reasonable to quote that the communities mentioned against any specific entry are those which have mutual affinity amongst them. thus, we find in the schedule to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 at part iv in item 4, the following communities are mentioned : part iv-gujarat 4. 'bhambi, bhambhi, ..... .' it is seen from the above said statement of objects and reasons that a joint committee recommended the inclusion and exclusion of the scheduled castes in the list and a bill called 'scheduled castes scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1967' was passed. it is in the argument of the counsel for the central government, mrs. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //