Skip to content

Did you mean: esso act?


Say About - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: say about Sorted by: recent Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 760 results (0.793 seconds)
Dec 26 1972 (HC)

Abdul Hamid Vs. Karim Bux and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-26-1972

Reported in: AIR1973All67

it cannot also be urged that all interlocutory orders like saythose passed on applications for temporary injunction the operation of which

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (SC)

Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: AIR1973SC786; 1973CriLJ565; (1973)3SCC690; [1973]3SCR136

..... the third question was as to what the appellant had to say about the evidence of the two witnesses to this he replied yes ..... lal alias mutiayan stated on oath that smt phoolarani was murdered about 17 years back and pratap was prosecuted for her murder ..... of law irregularity of procdure misreading of evidence misapprehension or misconception about law or facts more perversity or even undue hardship or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Fida HussaIn Vs. Imamat HusaIn and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: AIR1973All246

satish chandra j 1 the learned single judge has referred the following question to a full bench does the amendment...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Modi Industries Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: ILR1973Delhi886

..... for the determination of the right or liability and further lays down that all questions about the said right and liability shall be determined by the tribunals so constituted and whether ..... meaning or the meaning attached to them by those dealing in them that is to say to their commercial sense 22 cameron j in his majesty the king vs planters nut .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Poonjabhai Vanmalidas and Sons (H.U.F.) Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: [1974]95ITR251(Guj)

..... assessment he is under no obligation to instruct the income tax officer about the inference which the income tax officer may raise from those ..... the part of an income tax officer an income tax officer cannot say that he had reason to believe that a certain fact which ..... and complete the sale you may exercise your right that is to say the forfeiture may then stand good the information which was thus .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Lady Tanumati Girijaprasad Chinubhai Since Decd. (by Her Heirs Etc.) V ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: (1973)14GLR537

..... and the last contention which now remains to be considered is about the competency of the legislature to enact the particular piece ..... other words it cannot tax litigation and make litigations pay say for road building or education or other beneficial schemes that ..... words the legislature cannot tax litigation and make litigants pay say for road building or education or other beneficial scheme that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Chenaram Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: 1972WLN1025

..... his application dated 25th of may 1972 which is conspicuously silent about this matter the testimony of these 5 witnesses has been clearly ..... given to him by the minister in these circumstances he cannot say that any prejudice has been caused to the petitioner for not ..... shri chena ram it was very unlikely that these witnesses would say anything against the pradhan of the panchayat samiti didwana 17 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Deepchand and anr. Vs. Nandi Ram Sindhi

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: 1972WLN1043

jagat narayan c j 1 this is a revision application by the plaintiffs against an order of the additional munsif...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

P.S. Kandasami Mudaliar and anr. Vs. T.N. Ranganathan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: AIR1973Mad476; (1973)2MLJ94

order1 the plaintiffs in o s no 1430 of 1968 on the file of the district munsif court salem are...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Pioneer Match Works and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-22-1972

Reported in: [1974]34STC277(Mad)

..... central act the contention of the learned counsel that the amendments brought about in the local sales tax law in relation to the deduction of ..... cover ancillary or incidental matters 15 it is not therefore possible to say that madras act 3 of 1969 any way trenches on the ..... been put forward before us and the learned judge if we may say so with respect has considered the matter in some detail and has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //