Court : Delhi
..... (capf) in 2001 and was placed under the administrative control of ministry of home affairs (mha). later, on 20.12.2007, sashastra w.p.(c) 940/2016 page 1 of 5 seema bal act was passed by parliament. on 01.02.2005, mha by an office memorandum purported to combatize various posts including those in the military ..... cadre of sashastra seema bal (ssb). the relevant extracts of that order are as follows :3. 2. on combatisation, the afore-mentioned medical officers will ..... to what was directed in respect of the petitioners in kolkata and allahabad high courts. the petitioner was directed to be kept at the concerned position jw school, sashastra seema bal, gwaldam (uttarakhand).6. mr. bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of union of india contended that once all posts stood combatized and the applicant s position .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
..... . it is not in dispute that the applicant belongs to combatized cadre of sashastra seema bal and, therefore, governed by the provisions of sashastra seema bal act, 2007 (in short, ssb act, 2007) and rules, 2009 framed under the aforesaid act. section 3 of the ssb act, 2007 provides that officers and subordinate officers and under officers and other persons ..... enrolled under the act shall be subject to the provisions of this act and the rules. rule 8 ..... that the assistant commandant is at serial no.(viii) of the list of officers. section 4 of ssb act, 2007 provides that there shall be an armed force of the union called the sashastra seema bal for ensuring the security of the borders of india and performing such other duties as may be entrusted to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... india, the petitioner impugns the order dated 24.12.2014 passed by the commandant (medical), mtc, sashastra seema bal, shimla dismissing the petitioner from service having found him guilty of an offence under section 43 of sashastra seema bal act, 2007. the petitioner further challenges the order dated 08.09.2015 vide which his wp(c) 11182 ..... /2015 page 1 appeal against the same was dismissed by inspector general (personnel).2. the petitioner aged about 29 years was appointed as constable (nursing orderly) in sashastra seema bal (hereinafter referred to ..... officer. dr.x was a superior officer of the petitioner and deserved all respect.... petitioner s conduct, especially in context of armed forces was an act of gross indiscipline.16. the conduct of the petitioner was therefore clearly prejudicial to good order and the discipline of the force. even if there .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... appeal.2. the appellant herein was serving as a head constable (ministerial) in the 15th battalion of the sashastra seema bal (ssb), bongaigaon. he was charged with violation of good order and discipline under section 43 of the shashastra seema bal act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ssb act ), for having entered the mahila barrack of the battalion at around 00:15 hours, on the intervening ..... rank of constable and forfeiture of two years service for the purpose of promotion. she was also tried by the sfc for an offence under section 43 of the ssb act. it is submitted that therefore the learned single judge rightly interfered with the punishment of removal from service awarded by the disciplinary authority commandant holding that the same was disproportionate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioners is that they had appeared in the competitive examination conducted by the staff selection commission (hereinafter referred to as ssc ) for appointment to the post of constable in sashastra seema bal (in short ssb ). they qualified the said examination and joined their services on 09.07.2012 in ssb, 41 bn., ranidanga (west bengal).2. by an impugned order dated 17 ..... these petitioners made two fold submissions to challenge the said order. the first being; that vide order dated 17.05.2013 itself, the inspector general acting under the powers conferred on him under section 132 of ssb act, 2007 read with rule 185 of ssb rules, 2009 annulled the proceedings of summary force court (in short sfc ) on the ground that the .....
Tag this Judgment!