Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Year: 1973 Page 9 of about 88 results (0.152 seconds)

In Re: A.A. Paul

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1974CriLJ375

..... person shall be tried for an offence, unless his trial commences within six months after he had ceased to be subject to this act:provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to the trial of any such person for an offence of desertion or ..... means the accused in the present case, who was retired from service on 3-9-1972. is not a person subject to the army act. if that much is clear, then, undoubtedly the rules framed by the central government by virtue of section 549 crl. p. c. ..... was filed against him on 19-10-1972 for an alleged offence under section 5 (2) read with section 5(1)(d) of act ii of 1947 and section 161 of the indian penal code on the ground that he had accepted illegal gratification on 3-6-1972. ..... the special judge, madras, dismissing a petition purporting to be one under section 251-a of the criminal procedure code and section 126 of the army act. the revision petitioner is the accused in c. g. no. 15 of 1972 on the file of the special judge, madras. he .....

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court : US Supreme Court

..... hope that the texas legislature would remedy the gross disparities in treatment inherent in the texas financing scheme. it was only after the legislature failed to act in its 1971 regular session that the district court, apparently recognizing the lack of hope for self-initiated legislative reform, rendered its decision. see texas ..... safeguard is offended only if the classification rests on grounds wholly irrelevant to the achievement of the state's objective. state legislatures are presumed to have acted within their constitutional power despite the fact that, in practice, their laws result in some inequality. a statutory discrimination will not be set aside if ..... "american-flag" school in that country even though the language of instruction was other than english. this court upheld the questioned provision of the 1965 act over the claim that it discriminated against those with a sixth-grade education obtained in non-english-speaking schools other than the ones designated by the federal .....

Kusper Vs. Pontikes

Court : US Supreme Court

..... which he seeks to participate is held." "(e) in cities, villages and incorporated towns having a board of election commissioners only voters registered as provided by article 6 of this act shall be entitled to vote at such primary." "(f) no person shall be entitled to vote at a primary unless he is registered under the provisions of article 4, 5 ..... or 6 of this act, when his registration is required by any of said articles to entitle him to vote at the election with reference to which the primary is held." [ footnote 2/2 ] ill .....

Committee for Public Education Vs. Nyquist

Court : US Supreme Court

..... form of tax benefit is constitutionally acceptable under the "neutrality" test in walz. [ footnote 50 ] appellants conceded that, "should the court decide that section 2 of the act does not violate the establishment clause, we are unable to see how it could hold otherwise in respect to sections 3, 4 and 5." brief for appellants 423. we ..... is not related to the amount actually spent for tuition, and is apparently designed to yield a predetermined amount of tax "forgiveness" in exchange for performing a specific act which the state desires to encourage -- the usual attribute of a tax credit. we see no reason to select one label over another, as the constitutionality of ..... "has been designated during the [immediately preceding] year as serving a high concentration of pupils from low income families for purposes of title iv of the federal higher education act of nineteen hundred sixty-five (20 u.s.c.a. 425). [ footnote 9 ]" such schools are entitled to receive a grant of $30 per pupil per year .....

Levitt Vs. Committee for Public Ed.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in this court, appellants have insisted that, since teacher-prepared examinations are required by state regulation they are included within the services reimbursed under the act. in support of the former proposition, the appellants cite 176.1(b) of the regulations of the commissioner of education, which provides that all ..... certain costs of testing and recordkeeping, violates the establishment clause of the first amendment. a three-judge district court, with one judge dissenting, held the act unconstitutional. 342 f.supp. 439 (sdny 1972). we noted probable jurisdiction. 409 u.s. 977. i in april 1970, the new york legislature ..... construed to authorize payments for religious worship or instruction, church-sponsored schools are eligible to receive payments thereunder. the three-judge district court found the act unconstitutional under the establishment clause and permanently enjoined its enforcement. the court rejected appellants' argument that payments are made only for "secular, neutral, or .....

Keyes Vs. School Dist. No. 1

Court : US Supreme Court

..... school population in the park hill area and heightened sensitivity on the part of the community to the problems raised by integration and segregation. the allegedly discriminatory acts with respect to the "core area" schools -- new manual high school, cole junior high school, morey junior high school, and boulevard and columbine ..... negro communities and, in effect, to merge school attendance zones with segregated residential patterns. see brief for petitioners 883. yet findings even on such similar acts will, under the de jure/de facto distinction, continue to differ, especially since the court has never made clear what suffices to establish the requisite ..... same system justifies a rule imposing on the school authorities the burden of proving that this segregated schooling is not also the result of intentionally segregative acts. in discharging that burden, it is not enough, of course, that the school authorities rely upon some allegedly logical, racially neutral explanation for their .....

Naacp Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... contention that appellants were prepared to urge -- namely, that the grant of an exemption would nullify the specific congressional intent to extend the protections of the act to the class represented by appellants -- was never laid before the court. in upholding the denial of leave to intervene, the court reasons that appellants' motion ..... columbia. the appellants contend that the district court's order denying them intervention in that action is directly appealable to this court under 4(a) of the act. the united states "substantially" agrees that this court has jurisdiction to review on direct appeal the denial of intervention in an action of this kind. ..... the appellants had initiated other litigation in the united states district court for the southern district of new york to compel compliance with 4 and 5 of the act; and (3) the appellants possessed "substantial documentary evidence," jurisdictional statement 7, to offer in opposition to the entry of the declaratory judgment. faced with .....

New York Dept. of Soc. Svcs. Vs. Dublino

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a refusal to participate in some other program or a fictitious refusal of employment. [ footnote 2/6 ] the legislative history of the social security act confirms this interpretation, for whenever congress legislated page 413 u. s. 427 with respect to work requirements, it focused on actual refusals to accept ..... 376 recipients. [ footnote 25 ] moreover, the department of health, education, and welfare, the agency of government responsible for administering the federal social security act -- including reviewing of state afdc programs -- has never considered the win legislation to be preemptive. hew has followed consistently the policy of approving state plans ..... a partial program, with state supplementation, as illustrated by new york; and the department of health, education, and welfare, responsible for administering the social security act, has never considered win as preemptive. pp. 413 u. s. 417 -421. (c) where coordinate state and federal efforts exist within a complementary administrative .....