Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: supreme court of india Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.227 seconds)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... provisions of article 31c can apply only if the law received the assent of the president.2093. by the constitution (twenty-ninth amendment) act, 1972, the two kerala acts - act 35 of 1969 and act 25 of 1971 - were included in the ninth schedule thereby giving them the protection of article 31b. by such inclusion, the challenge made ..... 24 on september 12, 1949, observed : constituent assembly debates, vol. ix, p. 1299. we find on the english statute book several acts, the land acquisition act, the land clauses act, the housing act, in all of which a varying basis of compensation has been adopted to suit not only to the nature of the property but also ..... writ petition was amended twice. the first amendment was made with a view to enable the petitioner to impugn the constitutional validity of the kerala reforms (amendment) act (act 25 of 1971). the second amendment of the petition was made with a view to include the prayer to declare the twentyfourth, twentyfifth and twentyninth amendments to .....

Rosario Vs. Rockefeller

Court : US Supreme Court

..... from voting in the next primary election. according to the petitioners, this constitutes an unconstitutional durational residence requirement, and is violative of the 1970 amendments to the voting rights act of 1965, 84 stat. 316, 42 u.s.c. 1973aa-1. the petitioners, however, lack standing to raise these contentions. they make no claim that they ..... a reasonable registration cut-off prior to any primary or general election, beyond which a citizen's failure to register may be presumed a negligent or willful act forfeiting his right to vote in a particular election. but it is difficult to perceive any persuasive basis for a registration or party enrollment deadline eight to ..... if there are other, reasonable ways to achieve those goals with a lesser burden on constitutionally protected activity, a state may not choose the way of greater interference. if it acts at all, it must choose 'less drastic means.' shelton v. tucker, 364 u. s. 479 , 364 u. s. 488 (1960)." the court indicates that placing .....

State of Punjab Vs. the Gandhara Transport Company (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC531; 1975LabIC358; (1975)4SCC838; [1974]1SCR98

..... the first objection, namely, that the dispute that has been referred by the state government for adjudication is not an industrial dispute under section 2(k) of the industrial disputes act inasmuch as the cause of the workman had not been espoused by a substantial body of the workmen of the company. the labour court accepted the plea of the workmen .....

The State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, Baljit Singh and Karam Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2407; 1973CriLJ1589; (1974)3SCC277; [1974]1SCR328

..... outside and 41/2 ft from inside. no question was put to the witness in cross-examination, and we can find no cogent reason as to why the evidence of bal kishan be not accepted there could also, in our opinion, be no difficulty for those present inside the courtyard from seeing as to who were the persons who threw the ..... of labh singh's house was mentioned to be 61/2 ft. while in the other, it was mentioned to be 41/2 ft. this discrepancy has been explained by bal kishan draftsman (pw 9), whose evidence shows that the level of the courtyard of labh singh's house was higher than the ground outside. the height of the boundary wall ..... the evidence of these witnesses more closely. if their evidence can stand that test, as it does in the present case, there is no reason why it should not be acted upon. some of the witnesses are close relatives of the deceased persons and it is most difficult to believe that they would spare the real assailants and falsely mention the .....

Prabhu Dayal Deorah Vs. the District Magistrate, Kamrup and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC183; 1974CriLJ286; (1974)1SCC103; [1974]2SCR12

..... very exceptional circumstances as already indicated above. i in halsbury's "law of england (1111 edn. (vol. ii) p. 46), wefind : "although the habeas corpus act, 1816, enables the return to be controverted, and a total absence of jurisdiction, or matters in excess of jurisdiction, may be alleged and proved by affidavit, facts alleged ..... made by the petitioners. their cases, with their representations, had been sent by the government of assam to the advisory board constituted under section 9 of the act. the advisory board, before which the petitioners' cases are pending, had the jurisdiction to consider all the contentions of the detentes on questions of fact and law ..... bazar, gauhati. "that you indulged in such trade activities which created acute scarcity and high prices of rice and sugar in gauhati market. "you are, thus acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community as a whole in this district and your being at large has jeopardized .....

Kusper Vs. Pontikes

Court : US Supreme Court

..... which he seeks to participate is held." "(e) in cities, villages and incorporated towns having a board of election commissioners only voters registered as provided by article 6 of this act shall be entitled to vote at such primary." "(f) no person shall be entitled to vote at a primary unless he is registered under the provisions of article 4, 5 ..... or 6 of this act, when his registration is required by any of said articles to entitle him to vote at the election with reference to which the primary is held." [ footnote 2/2 ] ill .....

Committee for Public Education Vs. Nyquist

Court : US Supreme Court

..... form of tax benefit is constitutionally acceptable under the "neutrality" test in walz. [ footnote 50 ] appellants conceded that, "should the court decide that section 2 of the act does not violate the establishment clause, we are unable to see how it could hold otherwise in respect to sections 3, 4 and 5." brief for appellants 423. we ..... is not related to the amount actually spent for tuition, and is apparently designed to yield a predetermined amount of tax "forgiveness" in exchange for performing a specific act which the state desires to encourage -- the usual attribute of a tax credit. we see no reason to select one label over another, as the constitutionality of ..... "has been designated during the [immediately preceding] year as serving a high concentration of pupils from low income families for purposes of title iv of the federal higher education act of nineteen hundred sixty-five (20 u.s.c.a. 425). [ footnote 9 ]" such schools are entitled to receive a grant of $30 per pupil per year .....

Levitt Vs. Committee for Public Ed.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in this court, appellants have insisted that, since teacher-prepared examinations are required by state regulation they are included within the services reimbursed under the act. in support of the former proposition, the appellants cite 176.1(b) of the regulations of the commissioner of education, which provides that all ..... certain costs of testing and recordkeeping, violates the establishment clause of the first amendment. a three-judge district court, with one judge dissenting, held the act unconstitutional. 342 f.supp. 439 (sdny 1972). we noted probable jurisdiction. 409 u.s. 977. i in april 1970, the new york legislature ..... construed to authorize payments for religious worship or instruction, church-sponsored schools are eligible to receive payments thereunder. the three-judge district court found the act unconstitutional under the establishment clause and permanently enjoined its enforcement. the court rejected appellants' argument that payments are made only for "secular, neutral, or .....

Keyes Vs. School Dist. No. 1

Court : US Supreme Court

..... school population in the park hill area and heightened sensitivity on the part of the community to the problems raised by integration and segregation. the allegedly discriminatory acts with respect to the "core area" schools -- new manual high school, cole junior high school, morey junior high school, and boulevard and columbine ..... negro communities and, in effect, to merge school attendance zones with segregated residential patterns. see brief for petitioners 883. yet findings even on such similar acts will, under the de jure/de facto distinction, continue to differ, especially since the court has never made clear what suffices to establish the requisite ..... same system justifies a rule imposing on the school authorities the burden of proving that this segregated schooling is not also the result of intentionally segregative acts. in discharging that burden, it is not enough, of course, that the school authorities rely upon some allegedly logical, racially neutral explanation for their .....

Naacp Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... contention that appellants were prepared to urge -- namely, that the grant of an exemption would nullify the specific congressional intent to extend the protections of the act to the class represented by appellants -- was never laid before the court. in upholding the denial of leave to intervene, the court reasons that appellants' motion ..... columbia. the appellants contend that the district court's order denying them intervention in that action is directly appealable to this court under 4(a) of the act. the united states "substantially" agrees that this court has jurisdiction to review on direct appeal the denial of intervention in an action of this kind. ..... the appellants had initiated other litigation in the united states district court for the southern district of new york to compel compliance with 4 and 5 of the act; and (3) the appellants possessed "substantial documentary evidence," jurisdictional statement 7, to offer in opposition to the entry of the declaratory judgment. faced with .....