Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh Page 5 of about 577 results (0.142 seconds)

M.C. Rana Vs. Vijay Kumar

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... favour of the complainant. hence deficiency of service had been claimed on the part of opposite parties. in this background, present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed, wherein prayer had been made for the recovery of rs.38,921/- with interest @ 18% per annum and litigation cost has also been claimed to ..... opposite party on the ground of maintainability, estoppel and non joinder of parties and it was also stated that the complainant was not a consumer under the consumer protection act, 1986 and the dispute is within the exclusive jurisdiction of sebi and on merit, opposite party had denied having paid a sum of rs.38,921/- by the ..... forum below is not legally sustainable and the complainant does fall within the definition of a consumer as defined under section 2(i) (d) of the consumer protection act and finding of the forum below to the effect that the opposite party had not duped him is not legally sustainable. mr. lokesh kapoor, learned counsel for the .....

Branch Manager, the H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Deve ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... of the opposite parties. in this background, present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed against the opposite parties wherein compensation amounting to rs.25,000/- had been claimed for mental torture and agony and rs.10,000/- had been claimed as ..... on record ampa-14 dated 4.5.2009 receipt of paid amount. letter dated 29.8.2009 sardb/08-216, legal notice and postal receipt, gpa annexure a. due to act and conduct of the opposite parties the complainant was mentally tortured and harassed after paying the whole amount. hence, deficiency of service/unfair trade practice was alleged on the part .....

Hpseb and Another Vs. M/S. Jawalaji Alloys Steel Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2012AIR(HP)70

..... of the consumer. thereafter, the board filed an appeal before the secretary, m.p.p and power, government of himachal pradesh under section 36(2) of the act. one of the contentions raised was that the chief electrical inspector had no power to decide the dispute. the appellate authority held that the chief electrical inspector had ..... present dispute would have been referable to arbitration because of what has been provided in condition 29, it cannot be done, in view of the provisions in the act which would override the stipulation contained in the aforesaid condition. 5. it is thus clear that the apex court held that condition no.29 is subordinate legislation ..... was to approach the concerned dispute settlement committee and the chief electrical inspector had no jurisdiction to decide the matter. 8. under section 26(2) of the act the chief electrical inspector can only decide the disputes relating to faulty meters. in the present case the dispute is not with regard to the faulty meter but .....

H.P. State Electricity Board and Another Vs. Vishwas Sharma and Anothe ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... wherein it was held that neither the court nor any tribunal has the competence to issue a direction contrary to law nor it can direct an authority to act in contravention of statutory provisions. in view of the aforesaid discussion and facts and circumstances of the case, present revision petition is allowed and the order, dated ..... deficiency of service had been alleged on the part of opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 and as such present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed against the opposite parties wherein prayer had been made for directing the opposite parties jointly and severally to:- restore the illegally disconnected electricity supply ..... of electricity connection provided in shop no.2 of sheela bhawan, lihantoo building, near bus stand, sanjau, shimla, and is a consumer under the consumer protection act, 1986 and opposite party no.3 is the landlord of the premises where the complainant is running his business of ready-made garments for the last 8 .....

Raj Kumar Garg Vs. Raj Kumar and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... 2. the suit was contested by the defendants. the defendants have taken a number of preliminary objections. according to the defendants, plaintiff was estopped by his own act, conduct and acquiescence to file and maintain the suit. the suit is not maintainable in the present form as the plaintiff has no legal, valid, enforceable and ..... played by one shri ankush vashisht, who was defendant in a suit pending before civil judge (junior division), kasauli. the plaintiff and shri ankush vashisht were acting as property dealers. the plaintiff and one shri ankush vashisht and few other persons got signatures of the defendants on the blank papers and on some judicial and ..... at the most, admission of documents may amount to admission of contents but not its truth. documents having not been produced and marked as required under the evidence act cannot be relied upon by the court. contents of the document cannot be proved by merely filing in a court. 30. mr. ramakant sharma, learned counsel for .....

State of H.P Vs. Paras Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... so complete so as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion, consistent with the innocence of the accused and must be shown that in all human probability the act must have been committed by the accused alone. further circumstances from which an inference of guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently and firmly established; those circumstances should .....

Bhandaru Ram (Deceased) Through His Lr Rattan Lal Vs. Sukh Ram and Oth ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... 60 years for a suit against a mortgagee, to redeem or to recover possession of immovable property mortgaged. the corresponding provision in the limitation act, 1963 (new act or limitation act for short), is article 61 (a) which provides that the period of limitation for a suit by a mortgagor to redeem or recover ..... the deed gives time for redemption or adjustment of the rent or profits and liabilities in terms of the contract read with the relevant provisions of the act stood discharged, the limitation for redemption would run from the date fixed in the mortgage deed. otherwise, there is no limitation for redemption of usufructuary ..... by the mortgage becomes due.(b) for possession of immovable property mortgaged.twelve yearswhen the mortgagee becomes entitled to possession.7. chapter iv of the transfer of property act, 1882, deals with the mortgages of immovable property and charges. section 58 (d) deals with usufructuary mortgage, which reads as follows: (d) usufructuary mortgage .....

Bhandaru Ram (Deceased) Through His Lr, Rattan Lal Vs. Sukh Ram and Ot ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... 60 years for a suit against a mortgagee, to redeem or to recover possession of immovable property mortgaged. the corresponding provision in the limitation act, 1963 (new act or limitation act for short), is article 61 (a) which provides that the period of limitation for a suit by a mortgagor to redeem or recover ..... the deed gives time for redemption or adjustment of the rent or profits and liabilities in terms of the contract read with the relevant provisions of the act stood discharged, the limitation for redemption would run from the date fixed in the mortgage deed. otherwise, there is no limitation for redemption of usufructuary mortgage ..... the mortgage becomes due.(b) for possession of immovable property mortgaged.twelve yearswhen the mortgagee becomes entitled to possession.7. chapter iv of the transfer of property act, 1882, deals with the mortgages of immovable property and charges. section 58(d) deals with usufructuary mortgage, which reads as follows: (d) usufructuary mortgage.- .....

In the Matter Of: M/S Sunjay Biotech Solution Private Limited, Mumbai ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... undelivered or otherwise even after a period of more than one month, hence forum below had rightly raised a legal presumption under section 28a of the consumer protection act, 1986 of deemed service on the part of the opposite party and opposite party was rightly proceeded against ex-parte. provisions of section 28a, relevant portion thereof ..... below dated 24.10.2008 whereby opposite party was proceeded ex-parte. since this order is in conformity with the provisions of section 28a of the consumer protection act, 1986 which provides for presumption of deemed service in case registered ad is not received back undelivered or otherwise even after a period of one month when it ..... rs.1,69,200/-. as such deficiency of service on the part of opposite party as pleaded. in this background complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed for deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party. 2. in the present complaint notice of the complaint was issued to the opposite .....

Kamal Dutt Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the victim/prosecutrix, in the facts and circumstances was the willing party to go with respondent/accused of her own sweet will had been submitting herself to all such alleged acts, in such circumstances, the victim/prosecurtix could be treated as a willing and consented party at the relevant time and the accused cannot be held guilty of offence under sections ..... by the prosecutrix to free herself or raise protest or seek help for a period of over one year, which clearly shows that she was the consenting party to immoral act committed by the accused and as such, the charge under section 376 i.p.c. does not stand proved since she could give the consent being above the age of .....