Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 577 results (0.088 seconds)

Prem Kaur and Others Vs. Mahavir Walia

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... application under subsection (2) or sub-section (3) of section 14, which raises substantially issues as have been finally decided in a former proceeding under this act. the language employed in section 18 is analogous to the principles of res-judicata contained in section 11 of the code of civil procedure. the learned rent controller ..... the court shall presume that the landlords need pleaded in the petition is genuine and bonafide under section 13-b of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949. it was necessary for the learned appellate court to cite the judgment in this para. the learned appellate authority by relying upon baldev singh bajwa ..... immediate possession of the residential buildings and/or non-residential building by the non-resident indian. this provision does not exist in the h.p. urban rent control act, 1987. the learned appellate authority has reproduced the concluding portion of para 20 of the judgment reported in baldev singh bajwa versus monish saini, 2005(2) rcr .....

Smt. Padma Devi and Another Vs. Smt. Soma Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... his signature and date on document under section 59 and then certified under section 50. a presumption by reference to section 114 (illustration (e)) of the evidence act shall arise to the effect that the events contained in the endorsement of registration, were regularly and duly performed and are correctly recorded. none of the endorsements, ..... representatives. the signature on the original cannot be proved by production of a certified copy. nor can the courts raise any presumption under section 90 of the evidence act in that regard- see harihar prasad singh and another vs. mst. of munshi nath prasad and others. the high court and the 1st appellate court erroneously ..... dated by the registering officer, and shall then be admissible for the purpose of proving that the document has been duty registered in manner provided by this act, and that the facts mentioned in the endorsements referred to in section 59 have occurred as therein mentioned.sh.gupta has placed reliance on the judgment of .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Pramodh chand and others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... died due to vomiting and dysentery. pw11 had not suspected any foul play regarding the death of sakina. 16. therefore, we are of the considered view that there was no act directly or indirectly of curetly done by the accused persons which can be brought under sections 498-a and 306 of the indian penal code such view of ours is .....

Cit Vs. Allied Industries

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... derived from the business then such income is to be considered while working out the deduction allowable under section 80-ib of the act. there is no finding of any authority that the income was derived from any other undisclosed source. the addition was made to the ..... of late payment of esi. this offer has been made subject to no penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the income tax act. accordingly, a sum of rs. 2,50,000 is added to the taxable income of the assessee-firm.5. the assessing officer ..... profit of rs. 33,21,659 and 100 per cent deduction of this profit was claimed under section 80-ib of the income tax act, 1961. it is not disputed that the assessee firm is entitled to this benefit. the assessing officer found that one of the partners ..... expenses and also undertook to pay the tax on the surrendered income.this income could be taxed only under section 69c of the act under the head income from other sources and there was no question of it being taxed as income from business and much less .....

Onkar Chand and Co. and ors. Vs. Income Tax Department

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... 18,66,158 by the tribunal and returned the matter to the assessing authority, who imposed penalty of rs. 8,62,524 under section 271(1)(c) of the act.6. the petitioner firms were given a show-cause notice for furnishing incorrect income, which was replied to by them. after considering their objections, the prosecution was launched ..... on 16-12-1991, the respondent department conducted the survey in the premises of the petitioner firms, which was converted into search and seizure under section 132 of the act. both the firms in both the petitions had offered an amount of rs. 13 lacs for their taxing. the petitioner firm in criminal mmo no. 107 of 2007 ..... chand and its partners; and another complaint no. 195-iii/2005 against its sister concern m/s shankar dass bal ram kumar and its partners under sections 276c(1), 277 and 278b of the income tax act, 1961, (in short the act) allegedly for concealing the particulars of income to evade tax, wilfully and intentionally, which otherwise was payable under .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nanak Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009ACJ2240,2008(3)ShimLC518

..... has deposed that the claimant did not approach him nor did he again examine the witness.24. the present case pertains to the claim petition under the motor vehicles act and not a prosecution under the indian penal code. therefore, the degree of proof required to prove a fact is not beyond reasonable doubt but preponderance of probability.25 ..... heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record.mr. a.k. sharma has assailed the award for the reason that petition under section 166 of the 'act' was not maintainable as negligence was neither pleaded nor proved and the tribunal erred in holding to the contrary. pursuant to the registration of the f.i.r., ..... driver who is also the owner chose not to lead any evidence and the insurance company, vide order dated 1st march, 2002 was permitted under section 170 of the 'act,' to take all defences and led evidence to prove the same.8. appreciating the material on record, the tribunal held respondent no. 2 to have driven the tractor in .....

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Vidya Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009ACJ1434,2009(1)ShimLC99

..... their lordships of the hon'ble supreme court after taking into consideration the definition of the 'light motor vehicle' as contained in section 2(21) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 have held as under:from what has been noticed hereinbefore, it is evident that 'transport vehicle' has now been substituted for 'medium goods vehicle' and 'heavy goods ..... both light passenger carriage vehicle and light goods carriage vehicle. he has also relied upon definition of 'light motor vehicle' under section 2(21) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. he also contended that though the vehicle in question was registered as a taxi, but it was plied in a private capacity since he was carrying his ..... so drive a transport vehicle (other than a motorcab or motor cycle hired for his own use or rented under any scheme made under section 75(2) of the act) unless his driving licence specifically entitled him so to do. section 2(47) defines transport vehicle to mean a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an education .....

Ashok Kumar Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC140

..... to the extent of 30.78 per cent.3. trial court charged the appellant with the offence, under section 20(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act and on the conclusion of the trial convicted and sentenced him, as aforesaid.4. we have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and gone through the record.5 ..... the appellant.8. learned counsel further argued that pw-12 hc om prakash did not comply with the provisions of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, even though he suspected that the appellant was carrying some narcotic drug and also searched his person. he urged that the hon'ble supreme court in dilip and ..... notification. thus, the appellant is liable to be punished not under section 20(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, as done by the trial court, but under section 20(b) of the said act for which no minimum sentence is prescribed. the offence under section 20(b) is punishable with imprisonment that may extend to ten .....

Ramesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Akash Sharma

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008HP78,II(2008)DMC315,2008(1)ShimLC399

..... office and the residences of his superior officers using abusive language against him, humiliated him in the presence of his colleagues and superior officers. all these acts caused mental cruelty to the appellant. the respondent had filed two divorce petitions. these were compromised in the fervent hope that the respondent would live normally, ..... is, having illicit relations with his sister-in-law (bhabi), smt. sushma devi. these wild allegations have caused great mental cruelty to the petitioner. the acts mentioned above have caused great mental harassment to the petitioner and she has deserted the petitioner for more than two years without any reasonable cause,(ii) that ..... . there is no cohabitation between the parties since 1982 as admitted by the respondent. although the concept of mental cruelty cannot be cribbed and confined to particular acts, the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in samar ghosh v. jaya ghosh : (2007)4scc511 , lays down the principles applicable. the court held:98 .....

Ravi Kant Vs. Bhupender Kumar

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008HP31

..... was abandoned by him; (b) at the time when amended written statement was filed and no objection was taken therein, would clearly show that he has acted with deliberation and contemplation in abandoning the right and cannot now be heard to complain about the violation of statutory provisions which inures for his benefit even though ..... air1998sc492 this court while considering the provision of section 21(1)(a) first proviso of the u. p. urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) act, 1972 negatived a contention advanced on behalf of the appellant therein that the said provision was for public benefit and could not be waived. it held that it is ..... raghbir singh gill v. s. gurucharan singh tohra : [1980]3scr1302 this court negatived an argument that the requirement of section 94 of the representation of the people act, 1951 cannot be waived. this argument was based on the principle that public policy cannot be waived. rejecting the said argument, this court held that the privilege .....