Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 6,820 results (0.167 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Akash Sharma

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008HP78,II(2008)DMC315,2008(1)ShimLC399

..... office and the residences of his superior officers using abusive language against him, humiliated him in the presence of his colleagues and superior officers. all these acts caused mental cruelty to the appellant. the respondent had filed two divorce petitions. these were compromised in the fervent hope that the respondent would live normally, ..... is, having illicit relations with his sister-in-law (bhabi), smt. sushma devi. these wild allegations have caused great mental cruelty to the petitioner. the acts mentioned above have caused great mental harassment to the petitioner and she has deserted the petitioner for more than two years without any reasonable cause,(ii) that ..... . there is no cohabitation between the parties since 1982 as admitted by the respondent. although the concept of mental cruelty cannot be cribbed and confined to particular acts, the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in samar ghosh v. jaya ghosh : (2007)4scc511 , lays down the principles applicable. the court held:98 .....

Mrs. Preeti Vs. Manmohan Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)151PLR591

..... then there would be hardly any justification for the rent controller to frame an assessment order in pursuance of the provisions of proviso of section 13(2x0 of the act as interpreted by the supreme court in the case of rakesh wadhawan (supra). after the evidence has been led by the landlord showing the relationship of landlord-tenant ..... thereon and after calculating the costs to be paid to the petitioner, call upon the petitioner, to tender rent, in accordance with the provisions of section 13 of the act, as interpreted by the hon'ble supreme court in rakesh wadhawan's case (supra).12. the aforementioned contention, in my considered opinion is without merit. where a tenant ..... suit and tender rent thereafter. thus, after the rent controller held that the respondents were owners/landlords he was obliged, as per the provisions of section 13 of the act, as interpreted by the hon'ble supreme court in rakesh wadhawan v. jagdamba industrial corporation (2002-2)131 p.l.r. 370, to assess the rent, the .....

Abhay Sapru Vs. Chitralekha Bakshi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ744

..... the provisions of the family settlement ex. d-1/3, operate as a will of late smt. d.k. kaul.17. section 2(h) of the indian succession act, 1925 (the act) gives the definition of a 'will'. it reads as under:2(h) 'will' means the legal declaration of the intention of a testator with respect to his property which ..... that the principles laid down by the apex court in sarbati devi and anr. v. usha devi : [1984]1scr992 were applicable in interpreting section 26 of the said act and rule 35 of the delhi co-operative societies rules. the division bench also cited with approval the decision in sushila devi bhaskar v. ishwar nager cooperative house building society ..... that more than one witness be present at the same time and no particular form of attestation shall be necessary.19. also relevant is section 68 of the indian evidence act, 1872. the relevant extract of section 68 is reproduced hereinbelow for the sake of convenience:68. proof of execution of document required by law to be attested. - if .....

Premnarayan Vs. Kailashchandra and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : III(2008)BC658

..... the disputed signature with the admitted one made observations in the impugned judgment, totally disbelieved and discarded the oral evidence on record, therefore the court below acted with material irregularity and error.6. no document of the criminal case was filed by the respondent, which could have thrown light on the issues whether ..... . undoubtedly none of the parties was examine by the handwriting expert. the learned court below in exercise of powers conferred by section 73 of the evidence act tried to compare the disputed signature with the admitted signature of the appellant and held that the signature on ex. p/1 are identical with the admitted ..... of defence witness. the approach of the court below is highly prejudicial in exercising the jurisdiction vested in it by section 73. therefore, the court below acted with material irregularity and illegality'. mr. vikas rathi, learned counsel for respondent submitted that the judgment and decree passed by the learned court below is based .....

Moi Engineering Limited Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)21VST445(P& H)

..... given to the assessee before passing any order?3. the appellant is a dealer registered under the provisions of the 1948 act and 2005 act and filed four quarterly returns for the assessment year 1994-95 and paid tax according to the returns. the assessing authority ..... with the questions proposed on behalf of the appellant, it will be appropriate to refer to the provisions of section 11 of the act before and after the amendment:_________________________________________________________________________________________before amendment | after amendment __________________________________________________________________________________________11. assessment of tax.--(1) if the assess- 11. assessment of tax ..... assessee preferred appeals which were dismissed. the appellate authority affirmed the view of the assessing authority that limitation prescribed under the amending act 12 of 1998 was not applicable to the present case which was for the assessment year 1994-95. thereafter, the assessee preferred .....

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... station of singur in the district of hooghly started acquisition proceedings and several notifications were issued by the state government under section 4 of the said act. one such copy of the said notification is reproduced hereunder:government of west bengaloffice of the land acquisition collector & district magistrate &collector;, hooghlynotification ..... v. lotus hotels put ltd. : air1983sc848 , in which a statutory corporation arbitrarily refused to grant the sanction of loans to entrepreneurs who had already acted on the basis of the sanction, and had incurred expenditure and liabilities. the argument that the transaction was purely a contractual arrangement between the parties ..... differential treatment meted out to government recognised private law colleges alone. there should be nexus between the basis of classification and the object of the act under consideration. on the above crucial aspects, on an evaluation of government's affidavits, they are found to be wanting, replete as they .....

Eros City Developers Private Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR492

..... they had built their factory and with the permission of the respondents, petitioners invested huge money on buildings and machinery. state government cannot repudiate those acts to the detriment of the petitioners. land of the petitioners had been released from the acquisition earlier and they were allowed change of the user of ..... consistent past practice.' it appears to be well settled that the doctrine of legitimate expectation imposes in a sense a duty on a public authority to act fairly by taking into consideration all relevant factors. any unreasonableness is considered as unfairness and violation of the principles of natural justice. therefore, if there ..... cited by the petitioner-company.arguments19. mr. harish malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the mandatory provisions of section 5a of the act has not been complied with. according to learned counsel before depriving a person of his immovable property compulsorily an obligation has been cast on the respondents .....

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR166

..... of land for residential, commercial and institutional purposes, beside providing open space area in sectors 26-a, 27, 28, 42 and 43 at gurgaon, under the haryana urban development authority act, 1977, by the huda, in the area of village kanhai, rb. no. 73, village wazirabad, h.b. no. 75, village chakerpur, h.b. no. 74, village ..... colony, namely, sushant lok. it has further been claimed that from 22.08.1985 to 12.02.2007, 23 additional sets of licences under the provisions of 1975 act have been granted to the petitioner in respect of development of various pocket abutting sushant lok. the petitioner use to own land measuring 3.875 acres, comprised in ..... to the respondents to release 3.875 acres of land of the petitioner from acquisition in pursuance to declaration under sections 4 and 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for brevity, 'the act'), issued on 08.09.1997 (p-3) and 07.09.1998 (p-5) respectively. another alternative prayer made is for quashing of the aforementioned notifications .....

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

..... authority or function in an arbitrary fashion. the following illustrate the duties and functions of public nature and public character contemplated by the security act, securitisation companies and reconstruction companies:(i) efficient and focused recovery of public monies to reduce non-performing assets of publicly held banks and ..... in an arbitrary and unreasonable or opaque manner. further, the duties, functions and responsibilities of public nature and public character contemplated by the act for securitisation companies and reconstruction companies had been enumerated as hereunder:a) efficient and focused recovery of public monies to reduce non-performing assets ..... to the economy and to the health of banking/finance. the authority and functions prescribed for securitisation companies and reconstruction companies under the act are totally controlled and directed by the reserve bank of india. in fact, securitisation companies and reconstruction companies are prohibited from engaging in .....

Dcit, Spl. Range-i Vs. Jindal Photo Films Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... cit v. balkrishna malhotra 81 itr 759, the supreme court held that the interpretation of a provision in a taxing statute rendered years back and accepted and acted upon by the department should not be easily departed from. the following observations at page 762 of the judgment are important: interpretation of a provision in a ..... that the machineries purchased by the appellant relating to manufacturing of color roll films where machineries covered by the provision of eleventh schedule of the i.t. act. however, after detailed discussion i have held that the appellant is not entitled to investment allowance during the current year and appellant shall be free to claim ..... would be the photo films while adjudicating upon the exemption available under the section, we cannot deal with each and every entry in schedule xi of the act by sitting down to decide what to our minds is fulfilling the priority needs in various vital fields like medicine, communication and education. till the entry stands .....