Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Page 9 of about 105,335 results (1.899 seconds)

May 21 2013 (HC)

Present Mr. Yashpal Gupta Advocate Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . p.c., for quashing of fir no.07 dated 12.1.2012 registered at police station sector 3, chandigarh for an offence punishable under section 66a of the information technology act, 2000 alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of the same on the basis of compromise dated 6.9.2012 (annexure p/5).on notice, gurmeet singh arora, respondent no ..... , the petition is allowed and fir no.07 dated 12.1.2012 registered at police station sector 3, chandigarh for an offence punishable under section 66a of the information technology act, 2000 alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of the same is quashed. (vijender singh malik) judge may 21st, 2013 som

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2014 (HC)

Arunaben Pranshankar Dave Vs. Narendra Shankarbhai Dave and Another

Court : Gujarat

..... trivedi for the petitioner submitted that it is the cardinal principle of law that tenancy rights are heritable and therefore, section 5(11)(c)(i) of the bombay rents act is a salutary and wholesome provision to take care thereof and because of the said provision, the heir of tenant would feel safe otherwise they may be thrown out ..... and not of the suit premises, which is situated in bhavnagar. he further submitted that as per the provisions of section 5(11)(c)(i) of the bombay rents act, person residing with the deceased tenant before three months prior to his death can claim tenancy right, however, in the case on hand, the petitioner had raised her claim ..... have carefully perused order xxi rule 97 of code and it appears that the object for extensive amendments which have been made in order xxi of code by the amendment act, 1976 is to shorten the litigation and to expedite process of execution. sub-rule (1) of rule 97 allows a decree-holder or auction-purchaser of immovable property, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2004 (TRI)

In Re: Punjab Communications

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... which 4000 shareholders have already responded and surrendered the shares.9. i, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on me under section 19 of the sebi act 1992 direct that the representations made by smt. balbir kaur be rejected and that punjab communications ltd be let to proceed with its buy back offer in ..... special account on 26 march 2004. in view of the above, the contention that the proposed buy back contravenes the provisions of sec 77a of the companies act seems unsustainable.7.8 it is observed that puncom, a public sector company, had been generally a profit making company and recorded profits for seven consecutive years ..... that the disinvestment failure had no connection with the buyback exercise, which was done purely as an independent activity after fully complying with the guidelines under the companies act, 1956 and sebi regulations, which requires the company doing a buy back to maintain the minimum percentage of public holding as at the time of listing, post .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1997 (HC)

Ram Prasad Vs. Hari NaraIn and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj185; 1997(3)WLC631; 1997(2)WLN393

..... the plaintiff is suffering from disease of deafness, in the event also he may be examined with the help of the provisions contained in section 119 of the indian evidence act, 1872, which are applicable for the purposes of recording the evidence of a dumb witness. i am of the view that a deaf witness may also be examined ..... passing remark was made in respect of examination of power of attorney holder or the party. neither the provisions contained in order 3, rule 2 were discussed nor the word 'acts' was interpreted.8. on the other hand mr. kanta prasad sharma learned counsel for the defendants placed reliance on shambhu dutt shastri v. state of rajasthan, (1986) 2 ..... he is unable to appear in the court. he is suffering from 'severe sensory normal hearing joss' and has become deaf. therefore, he has authorised his son satyanarayan to act on his behalf and executed a general power of attorney in his favour. learned counsel placed photo copy of judgment of this court (in s. b. revision no. 805 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1996 (HC)

Dhanna Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(1)WLN434

..... suicide within a short period of her marriage and the appellants are responsible for the same.50. the appellants failed to rebut presumption under section 113a, evidence act. they raised a false plea of mental disorlderliness of the deceased.51. therefore, having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances narrated herein before, the ..... cruelty' shall have the same meaning as in section 498a of the indian penal code (45 of 1860)49. so, the appellants, by their persistent conduct and acts created such a suffocating tense and purturbing atmosphere amounting to cruelty and, lastly, the deceased finding herself unable to bear such a surcharged and tense atmosphere, felt compelled ..... above, a mere unnatural death, by way of committing one's suicide, no presumption as provided under section 113a or section 113b of the indian evidence act can come to the aid of the prosecution and hence the prosecution prima facie failed to prove that smt. chooni was ever subjected to cruelty or harassment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2008 (HC)

National Highways Authority of India Vs. Additional District Magistrat ...

Court : Kolkata

..... of the said order the additional district magistrate (la), burdwan was approached and compensation was determined under section 3g(7) of the national highways authority act irrespective of the fact that no formal acquisition proceeding was undertaken. thus the national highways authority submitted to the jurisdiction of adm(la) and availed ..... after holding that the adm(la) had no jurisdiction to assess compensation as there was no acquisition of land in terms of national highways authority act and his order awarding compensation is indefensible and finding that the writ petition is maintainable overruling the objection of learned senior counsel for the respondent ..... the person affected is entitled to get the compensation and the competent authority has jurisdiction to decide the amount of compensation. under the national highways act, 1956 the competent authority is the adm(la).20. learned senior counsel, mr. bandyopadhyay has further contended that since the writ petitioner/appellant, while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2013 (HC)

Present Ms. Promila NaIn Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by charanjit singh, respondent no.2 titled as charanjit singh versus md.shariq for an offence punishable under sections 102, 103 and 104 of the trade marks act, 1999, sector 63 of the copyright act, 1957 and section 420 ipc alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of the same on the basis of compromise dated 24.4.2010 (annexure p3).besides ..... p1) filed by charanjit singh, respondent no.2 titled as charanjit singh versus md.shariq for an offence punishable under sections 102, 103 and 104 of the trade marks act, 1999, sector 63 of the copyright act, 1957 and section 420 ipc alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of the same is quashed. (vijender singh malik) judge march 26th, 2013 som

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2016 (HC)

Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Railway and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... disproportionate to his known source of income, as the evidence was not strong enough to lay prosecution under section 5 (1) (e) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947, the competent authority might proceed against the appellant in a departmental enquiry. in furtherance thereof, the departmental proceedings were initiated against the appellant. after giving a ..... that the law makers do desire application of judicial mind to the question of even proportionality of punishment/penalty. i have said so because the industrial disputes act, 1947 was amended to insert section 11a in it to confer this power even on a labour court/industrial tribunal. it may be that this power was ..... of india and others; (supra). 20. the charge levelled against the respondent was not of misappropriation of any public fund nor due to his act or omission to do any act, the indian railways had to suffer any financial loss. the charge against the respondent was that he remained absent from the duty without there being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2000 (HC)

Makhan Singh and anr. Vs. Achhar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)126PLR65

..... this case. as i have already stated above that the plaintiffs are to establish that harbans singh had either died somewhere before the enforcement of the hindu succession act or after the death of gurbachan kaur. on both these scores they have failed.15. the second submission raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is ..... the first argument of mr. sarin is hereby rejected and repelled that it should be inferred that harbans singh either died before the enforcement of the hindu succession act or after the death of gurbachan kaur. it was necessary on the part of the plaintiffs to establish by leading direct or circumstantial evidence that harbans singh died ..... counsel for the contesting respondents submitted that it will be inferred in the present case that harbans singh had died after coming into force of the hindu succession act and seven years prior to the date of filing the application by the parties before the revenue authorities on 10.3.1983. meaning, thereby that harbans singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1999 (HC)

Sasidhara Shenoy and Bros. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and a ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1999)157CTR(Ker)440

..... is entitled to depreciation applicable to the buildings. pursuant to the answer given by this court, the second respondent gave effect to it under section 260 of the income tax act by order dt. 19th may, 1997.3. it appears that subsequently, the full bench considered the question whether a theatre was a plant and by judgment dt. 11th march ..... another assessee. in this view of the matter, we hold that the order passed by the tribunal on 19th may, 1997, under section 260(1) of the income tax act, does not suffer from any mistake apparent on record warranting rectification.'4. shri p.g.k. wariyar appearing for the petitioner submitted that it is axiomatic that a subsequent ..... law. the question is whether on the basis of the full bench decision can the tribunal compel to change its judgment under section 260(1) of the income tax act, which is stated thus'the high court or the supreme court upon hearing any such case shall decide the. questions of law raised therein, and shall deliver its judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //