Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 5,884 results (0.245 seconds)

Feb 12 2007 (HC)

Ramswaroop Jaiswal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1566; RLW2007(3)Raj1927

..... investigation, the police filed a challan against both the accused persons.3. the learned trial court framed charge against accused persons under section 8/20 of the act. the accused persons denied the charge and claimed to be tried. the prosecution examined 17 witnesses and also produced documentary evidence exhibit p-1 to exhibit. ..... he contended that vide notification dated 19th of october, 2001, issued in exercise of powers conferred by clauses (viia) and (xiiia) of section 2 of the ndps act, the small and commercial quantity of contrabands have been notified and as per this notification the 'small quantity' of the contraband 'charas' has been notified as 100 ..... the aforesaid circumstances, the appellant cannot be convicted on the sole testimony of police witness, pw-3. the question of applicability of section 35 of the act will not arise in the present case when the recovery itself is doubtful. the appellant had disputed the recovery of contraband. there are serious discrepancies in its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2001 (HC)

Sukhdarshan Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1620; 2002(5)WLC487; 2002(2)WLN333

..... .5 jaganath, the case of dowry demand come, but as stated above and looking to the facts that they were living separately from deceased-wife and no specific overt act has been alleged against them and that other relatives, namely, purshottam, jeth of the deceased-wife, rekha, wife of purshottam and renu, nanad of the deceased wife ..... or the other relations cannot, in all cases, be held to be involved in the demand of dowry. in case where such accusations are made, the overt acts attributed to persons other than husband are required to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. by mere conjectures and implications such relations cannot be held guilty for the offence relating ..... 2 gaurav, pw 7 amritpalsingh an dw 8 pawan kumar and the learned special addl. sessions judge has further erred in invoking section 113b of the indian evidence act in the present case.4. that accused appellants kishorilal, father-in-law of deceased-wife and smt. sita, mother-in-law of deceased-wife were residing separately and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1996 (HC)

Dhanna Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(1)WLN434

..... suicide within a short period of her marriage and the appellants are responsible for the same.50. the appellants failed to rebut presumption under section 113a, evidence act. they raised a false plea of mental disorlderliness of the deceased.51. therefore, having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances narrated herein before, the ..... cruelty' shall have the same meaning as in section 498a of the indian penal code (45 of 1860)49. so, the appellants, by their persistent conduct and acts created such a suffocating tense and purturbing atmosphere amounting to cruelty and, lastly, the deceased finding herself unable to bear such a surcharged and tense atmosphere, felt compelled ..... above, a mere unnatural death, by way of committing one's suicide, no presumption as provided under section 113a or section 113b of the indian evidence act can come to the aid of the prosecution and hence the prosecution prima facie failed to prove that smt. chooni was ever subjected to cruelty or harassment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1997 (HC)

Ram Prasad Vs. Hari NaraIn and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj185; 1997(3)WLC631; 1997(2)WLN393

..... the plaintiff is suffering from disease of deafness, in the event also he may be examined with the help of the provisions contained in section 119 of the indian evidence act, 1872, which are applicable for the purposes of recording the evidence of a dumb witness. i am of the view that a deaf witness may also be examined ..... passing remark was made in respect of examination of power of attorney holder or the party. neither the provisions contained in order 3, rule 2 were discussed nor the word 'acts' was interpreted.8. on the other hand mr. kanta prasad sharma learned counsel for the defendants placed reliance on shambhu dutt shastri v. state of rajasthan, (1986) 2 ..... he is unable to appear in the court. he is suffering from 'severe sensory normal hearing joss' and has become deaf. therefore, he has authorised his son satyanarayan to act on his behalf and executed a general power of attorney in his favour. learned counsel placed photo copy of judgment of this court (in s. b. revision no. 805 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2008 (HC)

Ram Narayan Singh @ NaraIn Singh, Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj590

..... wrongful restraint. three accused were present on spot and the role of three accused may be different, but they actively participated in committing robbery, therefore, their act in participation on spot proves their presence not only near to the victim so as to put them in fear of instant death. section 394 ipc provides ..... were ultimately committed by some of them, without the participation of others. those who committed the offences pursuant to the conspiracy by indulging in various overt acts will be individually liable for those offences in addition to being liable for criminal conspiracy; but, the non-participant conspirators cannot be found guilty of the ..... the hon'ble supreme court while considering the scope of section 121a ipc held that those who committed offences pursuant to conspiracy by indulging in various overt acts will be individually liable for those offences in addition to being liable for criminal conspiracy, but the non-participant conspirators cannot be found guilty of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2015 (HC)

Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog P. Ltd Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... separate and distinct from its shareholders with its own legal rights and obligations. it seeks to disregard the separate personality of the company and attribute the acts of the company to those who are allegedly in direct control of its operation. the starting point of this doctrine was discussed in the celebrated case ..... said to be carrying on its business pursuant to the authority of the central government?. that obviously cannot be said of a company incorporated under the companies act whose constitution, powers and functions are provided for and regulated by its memorandum of association and the articles of association. an incorporated company, as it well ..... of the words used by parliament in the definition clause of 'appropriate government'. it is an undisputed fact that the company was incorporated under the companies act and it is the company so incorporated which carried on the undertaking. the undertaking, therefore, is not one carried on directly by the central government or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2013 (HC)

Seema Vs. Babu Singh and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... s.b. civil misc. appeal no.840/2013 seema belim vs. babu singh & anr. date of judgment :::14. 08.2013 present hon'ble mr. justice p.k. lohra none present. the appellant-claimant has preferred this appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1988') for enhancement of compensation awarded by the ..... learned motor accident claims tribunal, jodhpur. the factual matrix giving rise to this appeal is that a claim under section 166 of the act of 1988 was laid by the appellant before the learned tribunal quantifying compensation to the tune of rs.11,25,000/- only. for claiming the said amount of compensation, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1985 (HC)

Om Prakash Soni Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN220

..... by authority having no jurisdiction--criminal application no. 218 of 1980 dated 25-11-1980 (guj). reversed--(conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act (52 of 1974) section 3.in our opinion the aforesaid submission of the ld. counsel cannot be accepted. on entire perusal of the decision in ..... supplied to detenue--detention is illegal--reversed--(conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act (52 of 1974) section. 3).whether the documents concerned are referred to, relied upon or taken into consideration by the detaining authority they have ..... rejects the plea cr. appl. no. 218 of 1980, dated 25-11-1980 (guj) reversed. [conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act (52 of 1974) section 3].constitution of india, article 22(5), preventive detention--ground--documents referred in ground not examined by detaining authority nor their copies .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2010 (HC)

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... not regulatory in nature. for vesting of undertaking in hzl, the undertaking of the mci was taken over by the government of india by the act of 1965, act of 1966 and act of 1976 and then undertaking was transferred to hzl. in jialal kapur's case, the division bench of this court was influenced by the ..... the respondent is that the respondent-company is engaged in commercial activity. the commercial activity itself is not a decisive factor nor body's registration under the companies act itself is decisive. the decisive criteria as already referred and discussed above, clearly proves the respondent to be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 ..... its functions and activities. the respondent-company raised preliminary objection that the respondent-hindustan zinc limited (for short 'hzl') is merely a company registered under the companies act, 1956 and it is not state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india and, therefore, no writ lies against it. in support of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2005 (HC)

Sita Ram Pareek Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4307; RLW2005(4)Raj2420; 2005(4)WLC142

..... the accused, he will be fully justified to discharge the accused, and in exercising jurisdiction under section 227 of the code of criminal procedure, the judge cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of the evidence and ..... vigil and wherever it finds that justice has suffered, it takes upon itself as its bounden duty to suo motu act where there is flagrant abuse of the law.'in view of the aforesaid decision of the hon'ble supreme court, the preliminary objections raised by the learned counsel ..... the high court.'8. in nadir khan v. state (delhi admn.), : 1976crilj1721 , the hon'ble supreme court observed as under:'the high court is not required to act in revision merely through a conduit application at the instance of an aggrieved party. the high court, as an effective instrument for administration of criminal justice, keeps a constant .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //