Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: rajasthan Page 3 of about 5,884 results (0.158 seconds)

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming ..... passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land ..... the petitioner, have resulted into gross violation of {6} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 law. he held that under section 91-a of the act of 1959, the uit is competent to direct, in addition to the prosecution lodged for such violation, demolition of the constructions by the owner thereof, carried out in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1997 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Gopal Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ810Raj; 1998(1)WLC1; 1997(2)WLN658

..... parameters or recognised guidelines for exercise of jurisdiction of the labour court or tribunal or national tribunal under section 11a if the industrial disputes act, 1947 where misconduct is proved either in the domestic enquiry or before the labour court or tribunal or national tribunal, we are of the considered ..... punishment in accordance with law. that is all about the labour court or the industrial tribunal exercising the powers under section 11a of the industrial disputes act where the misconduct is proved either before the domestic enquiry or before the labour court itself.(b) on the question as to whether there are definable ..... an opportunity to a workman to reform himself by proving loyal and disciplined workman by adopting reformative theory are only relevant considerations treating section 11a of the act of 1947 as a beneficial piece of legislation of the labour court, tribunal or national tribunal are also required to address itself while passing an order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2001 (HC)

Raj Kamal Gaur Vs. the Rajasthan High Court and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(1)WLN642

..... rules prescribed for appointment he has given appointment to one of his close relative i.e. sister's son. by doing this he encouraged nepotism. this act of the delinquent reflected his nepotism character.30. the third charge against the delinquent was that without advertising the vacancy the proceedings for appointment were completed in ..... one day. this was done to favour his close relative and thus, the delinquent acted in an improper manner and encouraged nepotism.31. in relation to the aforesaid charges the stand of the delinquent-petitioner has been that basant kumar was ..... made immediately and he has sought the permission from his immediate superior to make such appointment. since the rules had not laid any guidelines, the petitioner acted in consonance with the practice prevailing in the respondent court and, thus, no misconduct has been committed by him.43. the enquiry authority has found that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1997 (HC)

Rakesh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1434; 1998(3)WLC536

..... the following words:a prosecutrix of a sex offence cannot be put on par with an accomplice. she is in fact a victim of the crime. the evidence act nowhere says that her evidence cannot be accepted unless it is corroborated in material particulars. she is undoubtedly a competent witness under section 118 and her evidence must receive ..... of the victim in such cases is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the courts should find no difficulty to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable. seeking corroboration of ..... 2nd march, 85, is reliable and his evidence about the entires of the date of birth in the school record is relevant under section 35 of the evidence act. it may however be pointed out that the original application form which was submitted at the time of admission of bhagwati in (he school has not been produced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2001 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner Anti Evasion, Commercial Taxes Vs. Arihant Industri ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj495; 2002(3)WLN248; 2002(3)WLN248

..... goods under section 4 and 12.' 8. section 15 provides for exemption from tax, which reads as follows: '15. exemption of tax.- notwithstanding anything contained in this act, where the state government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification in the official gazette, ..... made by such units under exemption. the additional commissioner on the same day passed the provisional assessment order for the assessment year 1997-98 under section 27 of the act of 1994 levying the purchase tax totalling to rs. 1,65,381/- being 2% of the total purchase of 'raida' worth rs. 82,69,049/-. aggrieved ..... rise to the instant revision petition are that the respondent assessee m/s. arihant industries, riico industrial area, shivganj, submitted an application under section 40 of the act o 1994, stating that she is a woman entrepreneur in the tiny sector and is engaged in the manufacturing of edible oil. she purchased oil seeds for manufacture of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2015 (HC)

Narayan Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... a case based on circumstantial evidence. . last seen evidence is one of species of circumstantial evidence. last seen evidence as per part iii section 7 of indian evidence act, 1872, is relevant evidence against accused. for proving this evidence it is essential for the prosecution to prove two things, being that the accused was seen alone in ..... a fact situation, we reach the inescapable conclusion that no presumption can be drawn against the said two respondents/accused under section 114 illustration (a) of the evidence act. no ad- vers.inference can be drawn on the basis of re- coveries made on their disclosure statements to connect them with the commission of the crime. 9 ..... when there is evidence of last seen and recovery of silver oranment is made as per information given by the accused appellant under section 27 of the evidence act then obviously it is a case in which the learned trial court has rightly held accused appellant guilty of offence under section 302 and 397 ipc. the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2015 (HC)

Mrigendra Singh Vs. Sohan Raj and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... representation of son of the present petitioner, viz. jorawar singh s/o mrigendra singh, a minor by which some proceedings under section 83 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956, were sought to be initiated at the instance of the revenue minister against the petitioner and the petitioner in that writ petition being the purchaser of the ..... in making such a frivolous & collusive representation directly to the hon'ble revenue minister at the instance of a minor. since no limitation under section 83 of the act has been provided as such, the settled legal position in this regard is that where no such limitation is prescribed, such powers can be invoked only within a ..... herein) allowed the writ petition filed by one of the purchasers of the land in question, also found that proceedings under section 83 of the rajasthan land revenue act sought to be initiated by the then revenue minister at the instance of the minor son (jorawar singh) of the plaintiff- mrigendra singh, were not sustainable and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1977 (HC)

Maggi Bai Vs. Sitaram

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1978Raj1; 1977()WLN159

..... open to the courts to adopt another hypothetical construction on the ground that such a hypothetical construction is more consistent with the alleged object and policy of the act.8. the words used in the material provisions of the statute must be interpreted in the plain grammatical meaning. when such words are capable of two ..... .6. mr. lodha, learned counsel for the respondent, has supported the judgment of the first appellate court. he has con-tended that section 13 of the act deals with the general restrictions against the eviction of a tenant and as they were not found to be sufficient, special restrictions on eviction were introduced by amending ..... ble s. n. modi j., in prabhashanker's case (supra) in making the following observations.-'section 26 of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act has not been deleted and retains itself. it restricts the execution of decree for eviction against the tenant from any premises etc. passed before the date of commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2003 (HC)

Hari Singh Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR124]; RLW2004(1)Raj466; 2004(1)WLC682

..... material collected during investigation inquiry.9. since in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is facing trial for the offences under the provisions of prevention of corruption act and sanction to prosecute him has been accorded by the state government, it is not a fit case where suspension order warrants interference.10. accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed ..... the competent authority who can always review its order of suspension as it is an inherent power conferred upon him by the provisions of article 21 of the general clauses act, 1897 and while exercising such a power, the authority can consider the case of an employee for revoking the suspension order, if satisfied that the criminal case would be concluded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2010 (HC)

M/S Alpha (India ) and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... india. we have considered aforesaid argument also. before appreciating the argument of the petitioners, it is necessary to refer the objects for which the sebi act was enacted. it provides establishment of board to protect interest of the investors in securities and to promote development and to regulate the security market and ..... are passed by the courts, tribunals and quasi judicial authorities while exercising their inherent powers. in this case, such powers are contained in the sebi act itself. thus, mere passing of ex-parte interim order during pendency of the proceedings cannot mean elimination of principles of natural justice. the petitioners would be ..... failed to raise their objections before the board within the stipulated period and straightway approached this court. second proviso to section 11(4) of the sebi act does not eliminate principles of natural justice, rather it provides for an opportunity of hearing to the intermediaries or persons concerned. in the light of aforesaid .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //