Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: rajasthan Page 13 of about 5,884 results (0.083 seconds)

Ram Niwas Gupta Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj140; 1998(3)WLC751

..... . every wide power, the exercise of which has far-reaching repercussion has inherent limitation on it. it should be exercised to effectuate the purpose of the act. the exercise of discretion should be objective. test of reasonableness is more strict. the public functionaries should be duty conscious rather than power charged. its action ..... deal with public money for public benefit. the approach has to be public oriented, helpful to the loanee, without loss to the corporation. section 24 of the act itself required the board to discharge its function on businessprinciples, due regard being had to the interest of industry, commerce and general public. 'business' is a ..... . it has no definite meaning. its perceptions differ from private to public sector or from institutional financing to commercial banking. the financial corporation under the act were visualised not as a profit earning concerns but an extended arm of a welfare state to harness business potential of the country to benefit the common .....

Shakti Enterprises Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1985(2)WLN360

..... their conditions of service on the ground of similarity between the two types of benefits.10. their lordships have considered that the benefits which are available under the esi act should be given a wider interpretation for the benefit of the workers, and the definition which is beneficial for the downtrodden sector of the society should be ..... in dispute was whether the canteen and cycle stand is covered under section 2(9) of the esi act or not the second point in dispute was whether the labourers engaged for the construction work of the building or other ancillary parts are covered by the provisions ..... decision of the employees state insurance court, ajmer dated 7th april, 1983, in esi case no. 6 of 1978, under section 75 of the employees state insurance act.2. the petition so preferred before the esi court is against the demand which was raised against the appellant by the regional director, esi, jaipur. the first point .....

Sita Ram Somani Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1985(2)WLN539

..... calling the whole record of this case and considering the same, gave its opinion on 4th april, 1985 for taking further action of detention under the act by the home department and all matters pertaining to confessional statements, retraction of confessional statements, bail application, court orders and all other record were placed before ..... be regarded in a different light and conceivably afford justification for reaching a satisfaction that such individual may be detained in order to prevent him from acting in a prejudicial manner. after referring to the affidavit filed by the detaining authority the supreme court observed that there was nothing in the said affidavit ..... calling the whole record of this case and considering the same, gave its opinion on 4th april 1985 for taking further action of detention under the act by the home department. in the said affidavit it has been further stated that all matters pertaining to confessional statements, retraction of confessional statements, bail .....

Lrs of Narendra Singh Bhati Vs. Lrs of Fateh Singh Rathore and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , sub-rule 1a of order xxiii also does not provide for starting point of limitation on transposition. the reason is not far to seek. section 21 of the limitation act, 1963 reads thus: 21. effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant. - (1) where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or, defendant ..... the plaint shall be served on the new defendant and, if the court thinks fit, on the original defendant. (5) subject to the provisions of the indian limitation act, 1877 (15 of 1877).section 22, the proceedings as against any person added as defendant shall be deemed to have begun only on the service of the summons. ..... any reason for the transposition; the transposition would be apparently barred by limitation and the said application has been filed merely to over come rigour of the limitation act. i have considered the rival submissions. apparently, the provision relating to transposition of a respondent as appellant is envisaged only by provisions of rule 1a of order .....

Lrs Sh.Anndaram Vs. Sh.Munnalal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... executed by smt. puni bai, wanted to transfer the plot nos.107 and 108 to one shri mukul mahavir agrawal and plot nos.106 and 109 as husband of smt. seema gehlot to said shri mukul mahavir agrawal and, in this regard, a notice seeking objections was published in the newspaper, which was replied by the counsel of the appellants, ..... and due to a mistake made in good faith, in the interest of justice, indulgence may be granted in terms of proviso to section 21 of the limitation act, 1963 ('the act of 1963').it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants were not aware of the transfer made in favour of smt. puni bai and ..... court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit, be added. (3) ....(4) ....(5) subject to the provisions of the indian limitation act, 1877 (15 of 1877).section 22, the proceedings as against any person added as defendant shall be deemed to have begun only on the service of the summons. . section .....

Babu Lal Vs. Gopa Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj2304

..... co. ltd. and ors. : [2001]1scr8 wherein in para 24, the apex court held as under:now, we have to fix up the rate of interest. section 171 of the mv act empowers the tribunal to direct that 'in addition to the amount of compensation simple interest shall also be paid at such rate and from such date not earlier than the .....

Smt. Renuka Vs. Rajendra Hada

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2007Raj112; RLW2007(3)Raj1839

..... draw an inference against him.(emphasis supplied)14. in yuvraj digvijay singh v. yuvraj pratap kumar : [1970]1scr559 considered a case under section 12 of hindu marriage act, 1955 and propounded as under:a party is impotent if his or her mental or physical condition makes consummation of the marriage a practical impossibility. the condition must ..... man and he would understand the things and would not insist on sexual intercourse and reconcile with the situation. no case under section 12(a) of the act from the aforesaid paragraphs has been made out. the respondent has nowhere stated the consummation could not take place because of impotence of the appellant. what was ..... september, 17, 1994 of the learned judge family court, ajmer whereby the petition filed by the respondent-husband under section 12 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (for short 'act') was allowed and marriage between the two was annulled on the ground that it had not been consummated owing to the impotence of the wife.2. .....

Renuka (Smt.) Vs. Rajendra Hada

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007(1)WLN314

..... learned man and he would understand the things and would not insist on sexual intercourse and reconcile with the situation. no case under section 12(a) of the act from the aforesaid paragraphs has been made out. the respondent has nowhere stated that the consummation could not take place because of impotence of the appellant. what was ..... draw an inference against him.14. in yuvraj digvijay singh v. yuvraj pratap kumari : [1970]1scr559 , considered a case under section 12(1)(a) of hindu marriage act, 1955 and propounded as under: [para 5]a party is impotent if his or her mental or physical condition makes consummation of the marriage a practical impossibility. the ..... court in our opinion did not commit any illegality in declaring the marriage of appellant and respondent as null and void under section 12(1)(a) of the act. subsequent opinion of the medical board after about 14 years that the appellant did not have any structural defect does not affect the decree passed by learned family .....

R.S.E.B. and anr. Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998ACJ738; AIR1997Raj141

..... whatsoever, termed to be false of vexatious, the learned trial court cannot be held to have exercised its inherent powers without jurisdiction as well as also to have acted either illegally or with a material irregularity in passing the impugned order. the same being just and necessary for the ends of justice, the same cannot be ..... smt. mohni who were their parents, besides kishan singh, their brother was also similarly killed but keeping in view the provisions of section 1a of the fatal accidents act, brothers and sister cannot be deemed to be dependants to claim any benefit on account of the death. however, the plaintiffs having lost their parents in antaneously ..... to death on the spot. as a result, non-petitioner-plaintiffs brought action for damages purporting to be under the provisions of section 1a of the fatal accidents act, 1855 on account of death of their father and mother. it was claimed that the petitioner-defendants who were licensees and owners of the over-head electric wires .....

Pista (Smt.) Vs. Bheru Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj914; 2006WLC(Raj)UC436

..... of divorcee. on such remarriage that status of divorcee comes to an end and she acquires another marital status as someone's spouse. under the hindu adoption and maintenance act as well as under section 125 cr.p.c. wife includes a divorcee. therefore, when the wife remarriage, her claim of maintenance primarily comes to stand against her ..... mrs. beatrice honor agatha goodall air 1938 bombay 12110. we have given our careful consideration to the rival contentions. the scheme of section 25 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 suggests that there is no room for recovery of any periodical sum paid under order passed under section 25. the power to vary, modify or rescind an ..... only be in respect of liability that becomes due in future.8. learned counsel for the petitioner urges that sub-section 3 of section 25 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 does not make any distinction between permanent alimony and decree of periodical maintenance. the power of the court to amend, vary, modify or cancel the order .....