Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: mumbai Page 20 of about 7,165 results (0.187 seconds)

Feb 13 2004 (TRI)

Joaquim Alemao and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)(188)ELT231Tri(Mum.)bai

..... applicable in a case of prosecution under the customs act, we see no reason as to why the same principle should not apply in the proceedings before an adjudicating authority. these persons clearly stated that the ..... every attempt to summon these persons repeatedly. he was informed that these persons were living abroad. the commissioner observed that section 138 b of the customs act permits the prosecution to rely on the statements given by the witnesses if such witnesses cannot be produced without considerable expense and time. though these provisions are ..... is based on the evidence tendered by the three, vincy soares, baptista fernandes, and sebastian fernandes. their statements were recorded under section 108 of the customs act.12. within 10-15 minutes of the departure of costao, the churchill brothers arrived on the scene, the first to come it appears is joaquim alemao and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2012 (HC)

Smt.Shantabai Baban Muluk and Another Vs. Smt.Asha Janardhan Chaskar a ...

Court : Mumbai

..... a revision application which has been preferred by the first respondent before this court. that revision application under section 138 of the bombay prohibition act, 1949 (act for short) challenges the order passed by the commissioner of state excise, respondent no.4, before me dated 3rd december 2009 and the ..... to import, etc., intoxicants, etc., and fees levied include rent or consideration for grant of such privilege to person concerned. notwithstanding anything contained in this act, the state government shall have the exclusive right or privilege of importing, exporting, transporting, manufacturing, bottling, selling, buying, possessing or using any intoxicant, ..... beer bars, etc.. ......... ....... the minister has advised the members of public to take recourse to rules and regulations prescribed for complaining about such acts and they should resort to said procedure and then alone their grievances and complaints can be looked into and taken cognizance of. the learned minister, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1953 (HC)

M.V. Rajwade I.A.S., Dist. Magistrate Vs. Dr. S.M. Hassan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1954CriLJ366

..... a judicial nature, on the result of which the government, under section 22, is required to pass orders one way or the other.under this act, the government acts virtually as an appellate court with power to affirm, reverse or modify the recommendations of the special commissioners. so far as the enquiry itself is concerned ..... which is likely to prejudice mankind against them, then, irrespective of whether the matter is indictable, we would expect the press and the public men to act with the greatest caution before publishing any such inflammatory statement or narration. in this context we appreciate the apologies, in some cases wholly unconditional, which have ..... to the instant case. the commission in question was obviously appointed by the state government 'for the information of its own mind', in order that it should not act, in exercise of its executive power, 'otherwise than in accordance with the dictates of justice and equity' in ordering a departmental enquiry against its officers, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2007 (HC)

Jaimala Jageshwar Barapatre Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)BomCR357; 2008(1)MhLj428

..... to (e) contained in foregoing para no. 8. these points raised by the state have gone unrefuted, and we find that those are unrefutable. state has acted perfectly within the dictum of hon'ble supreme court.8. with this discussion, the issue relating to constitutional validity is considered to be properly answered and any further ..... of caste/tribe etc., concerned can certify the social status of persons who are claiming the benefit based on social status.(c) in absence of enacting 'act no. 23 of 2001', the field was bound to be governed by executive directions issued by the state government as modified in view of the judgment ..... de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as 'act no. 23 of 2001'), and rules framed thereunder.4. it would be convenient to deal with one after other challenges in sequence hereinafter. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2012 (HC)

Ansari Mohd. Zubair Vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nas ...

Court : Mumbai

..... castes, schedule tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes other backward classes and special backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000, (hereinafter referred to as the said act) governs the regulation of the issuance and verification of caste certificates to the persons from the reserved class. section 6(2) of the said ..... act provides that after obtaining the caste certificate from the competent authority, any person desirous of availing of the benefits or concessions to the reserved class interalia to secure admission to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Rajubhai Dhamirbhai Baria and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... of the accused by different set of investigating officers and public prosecutors in order to ensure that they are not influenced from any quarters and they can act independently and fairly and impartially both in the interest of the accused as well as victims. it cannot be forgotten that, in this case, the victims ..... . she submitted that, therefore, in this context the learned trial court had deemed it necessary to put questions to the witness under section 165 of the evidence act. further detailed submissions of the learned special public prosecutor would be considered and referred to when the evidence of these witnesses are taken into consideration. 59. before taking ..... recorded the statement. the apex court took a serious note about this fact and was pleased to convict the said witness zahirabibi under the contempt of courts act and sentenced her to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one year. the said witness has already undergone the said sentence. 8. taking into consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1999 (HC)

Globex Financial Services Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bakulesh T. Shah and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR419; (2000)102BOMLR795

..... of three hundred rupees; and the provisions of the last preceding section shall apply as if the court fees therein are payable ad valorem under the relevant court fees act.now what is again material to be noted is that the provisions of this section will apply where the subject-matter of the suit is such that it does ..... payment and selling property under charge as also restraining the party from demanding payment from the bank, the court fees would be payable under schedule 1 article 7 of the act. this was the alternative submission of mr. shah. article 7 of schedule 1 reads as follows :any other plaint, application or petition (including memorandum of appeal), to obtain ..... hands of a third party who is in wrongful possession, the suit for recovery of such shares would be governed by section 7(iv)(a) of the court fees act providing for suits for movable property where the subject-matter has no market value. mr. shah pointed out that in that matter the shares belonging to the respondent had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2012 (HC)

Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and Another Vs. Asadullah Khan Alias Sameer Kha ...

Court : Mumbai

..... no amounts were due from respondent no.1 to appellant no.1 and that it was beyond the scope of the present suit under section 6 of the specific relief act to raise any such contentions about the alleged liability of respondent no.1 to appellant no.1. 26. the submission is misconceived. though we are obviously not deciding any ..... khan (husband of appellant no.1 and father of appellant no.2) in delhi on 2 december 2011. the respondents had resorted to the most high-handed and malafide act of dispossessing the appellants from the suit flat and the suit office. inspite of the voluminous evidence placed by the appellants on record, the learned single judge has erred in ..... hence, the appellants instituted the present suit against respondent nos.1 to 4, being suit no.27 of 2012 on 12 december 2011 under section 6 of the specific relief act, 1963. on 14 december 2011, the learned single judge of this court passed an order appointing court receiver in respect of the suit flat and the suit office. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 2016 (HC)

M/s. Dosti Corporation and Another Vs. Sea Flama Co-operative Housing ...

Court : Mumbai

..... corporation granted occupation certificate. on 29th march, 2008, the completion certificate was issued by the municipal corporation under section 353-a of the mumbai municipal corporation act certifying that the building was completed in all respects and thus the file in respect of the said plot was closed. 42. it is submitted that ..... clearly makes it clear that on and from the appointed day the maharashtra ownership flats (regulation of the promotion of construction, sale, management and transfer) act, 1963 shall stand repealed. he submits that admittedly no notification has been issued by the state government appointing the day thereby repealing the entire provisions of ..... the municipal corporation for public parking lot and building 'c' wing. the plaintiff had accordingly applied for documents under the provisions of right to information act and subsequently came to know about the amendment in the sanction plan which were originally shown to the plaintiff and defendant nos. 3 to 5 society .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2014 (HC)

Ravindra Harshad Parmar Vs. Dimple Ravindra Parmar

Court : Mumbai

..... pune in a petition filed by the respondent-wife seeking divorce under the provisions of section 13(1)(ia), 25 and 26 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (the act). the impugned order is passed on an application challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the family court, pune to try the petition seeking divorce filed by ..... intention of being domiciled there, pursuant to the marriage. according to mr. muchhala once such intention is established she cannot take advantage of the hindu marriage act. he submitted that intended matrimonial home doctrine in private international law could govern the residence rights and therefore she would be subjected to law prevalent in united ..... on record, it is submitted that on the date of marriage neither the appellant or the respondent were domiciled in india and, therefore, the hindu marriage act cannot apply. mr. muchhala pressed into service the concept of intended domicile and submitted that the time when the marriage was fixed the respondent had already .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //