Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: central administrative tribunal cat mumbai Page 1 of about 12 results (0.092 seconds)

Amit JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... (2)scslj 294 stating that the tribunal was not right while deciding the oa on merits, overlooking the statutory provisions contained instructions in section 21(3) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. shri vadhavkar has argued mat the fixation of specific cut off date for any purpose was not discriminatory as held by the hon'ble supreme court in the case .....

Santosh Kumar Jangre, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Union o ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... concerned so as to grade him in various categories as outstanding, very good, good, satisfactory and average, etc. the competent authority and the reviewing authority have to act fairly or objectively in assessing the character, integrity and performance of the incumbent. it is seen that in the review order, various grounds on which the various ..... technical knowledge. the hon'ble supreme court in the case of m.a. rajasekhar vs. state of karnataka and another (supra) held that the remark does not act dispassionately when faced with dilemma as a inconsistent remark and the intention was to treat it as advisory. the relevant extract from paragraph 4 is set out herein ..... in the assessment orders on the basis of his prima facie opinion. the cit issued notices to the said three assessees under section 263 of the income tax act for review of the income tax assessment. however, after hearing the assessees, the review proceeding was dropped. however, the adverse remarks were retained on the basis .....

Ashok Dashrath More and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ143CAT

..... case of full bench of this tribunal in mahavir and ors. v. union of india and ors. at full bench 1997-2001 page 99 it was held: administrative tribunals act, 1985 section 21 - casual labour - limitation those casual labourers who have been discharged from service on account of nonavailability of work have the right to have their names ..... placed in the live casual labour register - this right accrues in their favour the moment their services are discharged provisions of section 21 of the at act would be applicable to the applications filed seeking benefits of the railway board circulars dated 25.4.1981 and 28.8.1987.ratan chandra sammant and ors. v. ..... suit for declaration that an order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the plaintiff is wrongful, illegal or ultra vires is governed by article 113 of the limitation act, the decision to the contrary taken by the punjab and haryana high court in these and other cases (suite of punjab v ajit singh, (1998(1) slr .....

Pokale Dattatraya Gopinath and Another Vs. Indo-german Tool Room, (Thr ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... and pensions, the respondent no.1 was brought under the jurisdiction of this tribunal by virtue of the provisions of section 14 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 with a view to get the employees benefit of speedy redressal of their grievances. this is how this dispute comes within the competence of this ..... therefore, illegal and is tainted with malafides, inasmuch as the service conditions of the applicant were also changed in violation of section 9a of the industrial disputes act, 1947. 6. the applicant, therefore, challenged the transfer order before the industrial court, aurangabad. however, subsequently the same was withdrawn unconditionally with liberty to ..... brief giving rise to the present proceeding may be stated as under: that the respondent no.1 is registered under the provisions of the societies registration act 1860 and it runs a factory and training institute. its registered office is located at aurangabad having branches within the territory of state of maharashtra. .....

Shankar Baluram Ladehllu Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ316CAT

..... done despite the fact that the respondents were in possession of all relevant papers including the service sheet/record of the applicant. it was the responsibility of the respondents to act in accordance with the record and appellant can not be penalised for their mistake. further, under chapter 7 of the aforesaid rules, all the actions are to be taken ..... ltd. v. income tax commissioner, karnataka-i, bangalore 7. ...the circulars or instructions given by the board are not doubt binding in law on the authorities under the act but when the supreme court or the high court has declared the law on the question arising for consideration it will not be open to a court to direct that ..... limited (supra) wherein it was held: the effect that the circulars or instructions given by the board are not doubt binding in law on the authorities under the act but when the supreme court or the high court has declared the law on the question arising for consideration it will not be open to a court to direct that .....

Vinod G. Joshi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ115CAT

..... control. the rules, which are embodied in the schemes, framed by the board, are within the powers, conferred under rule 157, and, in the absence of any act, having been passed by the 'appropriate' legislature, on the said matter, the rules, framed by the railway board, will have full effect and, if so indicated, ..... show that nine duties in addition to 20 duties are prescribed for guards working on passenger trains. they have also filed the information received under right to information act (exhibit r-5) regarding duties of goods guard and passenger guard as provided by the railway administration to show that there is difference between duties, responsibilities, ..... of the operating manual. he has also contended that the railway board by circular dated 07.8.2003 changed the process of selection and specified the positive-act consisting of only written test to assess the professional ability of the candidates. the said circular has not been challenged by the applicants.10. we have .....

Balkrishna Gonduji Gawai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ273CAT

..... of duty, the offender owes to the society or for breach of which law has provided that the offender shall make satisfaction to the public. so crime is an act of commission in violation of law or of omission of public duty. the departmental enquiry is to maintain discipline in the service and efficiency of public service....15. further, ..... and unfair. in that case, a criminal complaint was also lodged against the appellant therein under section 5(1)(e) r/w 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 which was based on same set of facts, charges, evidence and witnesses. the criminal court honourably acquitted the appellant of the said offence by holding that the prosecution ..... on 3.6.1999 and 4.6.99 as discussed in aforesaid paras which showed that shri b.g. gawai, charge official has exhibited the lack of integrity and this act on his part was such, which amounts to unbecoming of a government servant.10. it is, thus, abundantly clear that the charges as contained in the charge-sheet .....

Trilokchand Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ77CAT

..... , bangalore v. commissioner of income tax, karnataka, that the circulars or instructions given by the board are no doubt binding in law on the authorities under the act but when the supreme court or the high court has declared the law on the question arising for consideration it will not be open to a court to direct ..... is further strengthened by reply of the railway board furnished in reference to the letter dated 06.6.2006 of applicant's advocate seeking information under right to information act. the said reply annexed to the letter dated 27.7.2006 issued by public information officer, railway board reads as under: reply to the information sought by mr ..... on letter dated 27.7.2006 issued by public information officer, railway board in reference to letter issued by advocate of the applicant seeking information under right to information act, 2005. the said reply has been annexed to annexure to the letter.14. reliance has also been placed in the irem volume-i, ii rules governing promotion of .....

M.K. Gupta Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... where the hon'ble apex court has clearly stated that the state should be a model employer and in the present case, we fail to understand how railways have acted as a model employer by delaying the departmental proceedings despite the clear order by the hon'ble high court to finalise it within six months time. nor have they ..... a government official right to promotion is not an indefeasible right but right to be considered for promotion is fundamental. we are also of the view that if an act of injustice would have perpetrated on an employee, it needs to be examined and corrected if possible. in this case, there are certain facts which are incontrovertible but ..... . hemraj singh chauhan and ors. (2010) 1 scc (lands) 1002 wherein the hon'ble apex court held that: "35. both the central government and state government are to act as a model employers, which is consistent with their role win a welfare state. 36. it is an accepted legal position that the right of eligible employees to be considered .....

Smt. Selva W/O Subramani Mani Naidu Vs. Divisional Railway Manager (Pe ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... duties. moreover, the applicant has never made any representation to the respondents against the transfer order, hence the oa is premature under the provisions of section 22 of administrative tribunals act, 1985. the service record of the applicant shows that he was appointed on 01.1.1994 and selected as tc on 31.01.1997 and further promoted as senior ticket ..... any traveling authority and did not co-operate during vigilance check. for this purpose, it was stated that major charge-sheet should be proceeded him. the respondents have denied any act of malafide, which the applicant claims through the narration of para 4. they rely on the supreme court judgment in the case of s/o up vs. gobardhan lal, 2004 .....