Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: mumbai Page 11 of about 7,165 results (0.068 seconds)

Cawas Dhunjishaw Saher Vs. Keikobad C. Batliwala

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR175

..... cawas saher had approached the city civil court, bombay in suit no. 6838 of 1967, respondent keikobad initiated proceedings under section 41 of the presidency small causes court act, 1882 for ejectment of his gratuitous licensee cawas saher. these proceedings were initiated in 1988 being l.e. suit no. 396/454 of 1988. the ejectment application ..... 1988 suit filed by respondent keikobad, the relationship of licensor and licensee having come to an end, an application under section 41 of the presidency small causes courts act, 1882 was not at all maintainable. secondly, it was contended that the mother of the petitioner cawas namely aloo saher was the member of the family of ..... first place, on the averments in the application for ejectment, the 1988 suit filed by respondent keikobad was maintainable under section 41 of the presidency small causes courts act, 1882. secondly, it was contended that, on her marriage, aloo had ceased to be the member of the family of her parents and since she had .....

Jolly Elevators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.M. Yagnik and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2001Bom68; 2000(4)ALLMR289; 2001(1)BomCR205; (2000)3BOMLR671; 2000(4)MhLj366

..... with the contract. and as the defendants reside, and carry on business in bombay and are thus amenable to the jurisdiction of the high court, that court can act in personam and compel the defendants to fulfill their fiduciary obligation though such fulfillment has reference to lands situate outside the jurisdiction.' 8. shri mahajan, j. held thus ..... rendered majority judgment. the principal question that arose in that case is what is the meaning of 'suits for land' occurring in clause 12 of the letters patent act. each one of the hon'ble judges have given their own reasons for their conclusion. the learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon the observation made by ..... to over in the plaint. without prejudice to the aforesaid i further respectfully submit that the plaintiffs have not taken leave under clause xii of the letters patent act which is condition precedent to file and maintain the suit in this hon'ble court, the suit is therefore, bad in law, not maintainable, untenable and .....

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

..... of gas under the psc.39. on 7.11.2006/8.11.2006, a company application no. 1122/06 under section 392 of the companies act, 1956 (the act) has been filed before the bombay high court in which the prayers are as under:(a) order and direct ril to take all necessary steps in ..... a complete code for sanctioning any scheme including of arrangement, demerger, merger and amalgamation.112. the words 'arrangement' and/or 'compromise' are not defined under the companies act. both the words have their different meaning and purpose. in the present case, there is an arrangement between the demerged company and the resulting company. the said arrangement ..... referred therein. the existence of letters/correspondence remained unchallenged.60. after going through all these correspondences one thing is very clear that both the parties in fact acted upon the said family arrangement and/or mou dated 18.6.2005 throughout. these correspondences further confirm that there is an arrangement made and agreed between ril .....

Chintan Upadhyay Vs. Hema Upadhyay and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... them for a purpose. it cannot be said, therefore, that the allegations in the present complaint do not disclose commission of offences under the said act. the act prohibits advertisements containing indecent representation of women and publication or sending by post, books, pamphlets containing indecent representation of women. therefore, no person shall ..... reads as follows:- label mean any written, marked, stamped, printed or graphic matter, affixed to, or appearing upon, any package 26] section 3 of the act contains a prohibition on advertisement containing indecent representation of women. 27] in the present case, the learned judge has not issued process by invoking section 3. ..... of women in any form is prohibited. in the present case, the complaint does not disclose publication or exhibition of the nature contemplated by the said act. 18] for all these reasons, even if the photographs annexed to the complaint correctly depicts the painting and their contents still, no offence within .....

Kadar Sattar Solanki Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... was no summons issued by the police to the petitioner calling upon the petitioner to remain present in the police station. thus, neither the power conferred by the bombay police act, 1951 to arrest without warrant was exercised nor appropriate process was issued for procuring presence of the petitioner at the police station. 11. the factual scenario which emerges based ..... urged that there is no illegality committed and an offence under section 112 read with section 117 of the bombay police act, 1951 has been registered against the petitioner. he pointed out that various offences under the motor vehicles act, 1988 along with an offence punishable under section 186 of the indian penal code have been registered against the petitioner. he ..... their lawful duties. hence, the petitioner was brought to the police station and the offence were registered against him under section 112 r/w 117 of bombay police act, under section 130(1), 177 r/w 130(3) 177 r/w 21(17), 177, 158 r/w 177 of motor vehicles .....

Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... removal of unauthorised temporary development summarily. 10. the structure is unauthorised. the law relating to urban planning in the state - the maharashtra regional town planning act, 1966 - applies to every person who intends to carry out development. that brazen violations of the nature involved in this case take place in an ..... for permission. section 45(1) stipulates that on receipt of an application under section 44, the planning authority may, subject to the provisions of the act, grant permission unconditionally or subject to conditions or refuse permission, by an order in writing. section 46 requires the planning authority, while considering an application ..... the purposes of planning and development when the authority was constituted as the new town development authority for navi mumbai under the maharashtra regional town planning act, 1966 under a possession receipt dated 30 june 1973. in 1992, navi mumbai municipal corporation came into existence and is now designated as the .....

Simon Laximon Gopi and Another Vs. PaskIn Fernandes and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... however, the respondents no. 1 and 2 could defeat the claim of compensation made by the claimants by establishing that the accident in question had occurred due to wrongful act, neglect or default of the deceased himself. 16. the first question, therefore, which arises for determination is whether the respondents no. 1 and 2 proved that ..... national insurance company limited vs. sinitha and others? (supra), the issue was whether the claim for compensation made under section 163-a of the m.v. act can be defeated either by the owner or insurance company by pleading and by establishing that the accident in question was based on the contributory negligence of the offending ..... awarding compensation on the basis of structured formula under second schedule. therefore, in terms of the said structured formula under section 163-a of the m. v. act, given in the second schedule, the multiplier of 16 was taken to be appropriate multiplier. the tribunal held that the monthly income of the deceased was rs. .....

Jagruti Bhatia Vs. Samir Bhatia and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... perused the material on record. as noted earlier, respondent no.1-husband filed petition no.a-1585 of 2010 for divorce under section 13(1) (ia) of the hindu marriage act, 1955. petition no.e-17 of 2011 was filed by the applicant for maintenance under section 125 of cr.p.c. prayer (f) of that petition reads as under: (f ..... oral judgment: 1. heard ms.seema sarnaik, learned counsel for the applicant, mr. puneet chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and mr. a.r.patil, learned a.p.p. for respondent no.2 at length. ..... the parties on the proposed application are kept open. the family court will decide the application uninfluenced by the observations made herein. all the parties including the family court to act on the authenticated copy of this order. .....

Arun Vs. Varsha and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... specified in clause (i) of sub section (1) of section 13, the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at or condoned the act or acts complained of or where the ground of the petition is cruelty the petitioner has not in any manner condoned the cruelty, and (bb) when a divorce is ..... petitioner-husband challenging the order passed by principal judge, family court, aurangabad in petition c-4 of 1996 under sections 18 and 20 of hindu adoption and maintenance act 1956. learned counsel for petitioner-husband has submitted that appeal deserves to be allowed by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned in charge judge ..... join the company of petitioner-husband. learned counsel further submitted that learned judge of family court has misconstrued and misinterpreted the provisions of section 23 of the said act and thereby arrived at an erroneous conclusion. in fact, the family court ought to have granted decree for divorce on the sole ground that there has been .....

Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Madhukar Sheth

Court : Mumbai

..... the matter and after having gone through the record. i find that considering the extremely limited jurisdiction of this court under section 34 of arbitration and conciliation act, the award passed by the arbitral tribunal cannot be interfered. 45. it is necessary to first note that the appellant had challenged the transactions allegedly ..... respondent's membership even when the proceedings were pending before the arbitral tribunal. the appellant in his rejoinder to his application under section 27 of the act before the arbitral tribunal stated that the sebi had suspended and revoked the respondent's registration for two years. although the appellant did not state that ..... applicant broker had suo-moto taken the responsibility to square-off all the respondents purchase positions without informing the respondent or without giving him due notice which act of the applicant is in stark contravention to the bye-law no.174 and regulation 13 of the rules, bye-laws and regulations of the exchange .....