Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: kolkata Page 3 of about 2,450 results (0.125 seconds)

Oct 05 2016 (HC)

Reckitt Benckiser Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. Controller of Patents and De ...

Court : Kolkata

..... subject to any rules made under section 44, in any proceeding under this act before the controller, the evidence shall be given by affidavit in the absence of directions by the controller to the contrary; but in any case in which ..... request you to kindly grant us, the attorneys of proprietor of registered design no.184135, under section 37 read with section opportunity 32 of the designs to examine . act, 2000 an cross- thus we request you that a date for crossexamination may be fixed under prior intimation to us. shall ever remain. yours faithfully, anuradha salhotra ..... the affidavits, namely, balchandra s. virkar, neelam pandit and professor vijay parshuram bapat. section 32 of the 2000 act empowers the controller with the powers of the civil court while section 37 of the 2000 act is covered by chapter viii which deals, inter alia with evidence and reads as follow:- evidence before the controller .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2009 (HC)

Sri Amar Kumar Barik and ors. Vs. National Instruments Limited and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

..... they had taken measures to mobilize resources to meet the extra burden. it was further submitted that after amendment of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985, the pses have been brought within its purview. so far 50 pses have been registered with the bifr. it was suggested that the pses, ..... in the 49th annual report for 2005-06 of nil. the authorities were repeatedly approached by the petitioners but without any result. the respondent authorities, thus, acted in an arbitrary manner and the writ petitioners had been discriminated against.10. being left with no choice, the petitioners approached this court for redressal of their ..... company on a reference to the board for industrial and financial reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as 'bifr') under section 17 of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985. the government of india, ministry of industry, department of public enterprises issued one office memo no. 2(42)/97-dpe(wc) dated 24th october, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2003 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ananda Moyee Dikpati and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2004ACJ826

..... united india insurance co. ltd, v. darshan kaur, 2001 acj 998 (p&h;)]. it is significant to mention that in the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the motor vehicles act and while appreciating the spirit of the same, it is clear that the third party means and includes all victims of a motor accident other than parties to the contract .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2014 (HC)

MerlIn Orihects Ltd. Vs. Educo Ventures Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... dated 21st november, 2013 at the time of hearing of this application. in that event, the court might consider passing orders under section 33 of the said act. at this stage, i pass an interim order restraining the defendant from selling otherwise transferring, encumbering, dealing with or parting with possession of the premises described in ..... insufficiently stamped, it cannot be used for any purpose whatsoever. the following dictum was pronounced in paragraph 25 of the judgment 25. section 35 of the act, however, rules out applicability of such provision as it is categorically provided therein that a document of this nature shall not be admitted for any purpose whatsoever ..... a rs.100/- stamp paper only. mr.chatterjee, learned senior advocate argued that the document could not be admitted in evidence. section 35 of the stamp act, 1899 applied to all stages of the proceeding, according to sms tea estates private limited versus chandmari tea company private limited reported in (2011) 14 scc66 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2014 (HC)

Fairmacs Shipping and Transport Services Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commis ...

Court : Kolkata

..... . these goods arrived on 13th december 2011 in kolkata port. on 20th february 2012 these goods were seized by the directorate of revenue intelligence under section 110 of the customs act, 1962. confiscation proceedings have been started by them which are pending. the allegation is that the goods are completely worthless. hence there was a misdeclaration of the goods and their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2016 (HC)

New Kenilworth Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Koliii, ...

Court : Kolkata

..... consideration which remained unpaid. but such entitlement is subject to a contract between the buyer and the seller as would appear from section 55 of the transfer of property act, which provides as follows: 55. rights and liabilities of buyer and seller.- in the absence of a contract to the contrary, the buyer and the seller of ..... the addition made by the assessing officer cannot be supported. mr.khaitan, learned senior advocate, drew our attention to sub-section (4) of section 55 of the transfer of property act, which provides as follows: (4) the seller is entitled- (a) to the rents and profits of the property till the ownership thereof passes to the buyer; (b) ..... , 2010 when the appeal was admitted by this court: (a) whether on a true and proper interpretation of sub-section (4) of section 80hhd of the income tax act, 1961, the tribunal was justified in law in upholding the addition of rs.44,68,966/- and its purported findings in that behalf are arbitrary, unreasonable and pervers.?. (b .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2003 (TRI)

itc Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2003)86ITD135(Kol.)

..... a person can hold the land and another person can be owner of the building or superstructure constructed thereon. this is fully recognized under the it act. section 32 of the it act provides for depreciation on buildings, etc. while considering the question whether building includes the land, it was held that from its very nature, ..... any conclusion. surprisingly, at the time of hearing nothing about the adjudication by the enforcement directorate has been said by either party. since, foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 is rib more in force and even its sunset period of two years is over on 31st may, .2002, this matter would have definitely ..... year based on allegations on altogether different aspects contained in show-cause notices issued by the authorities under the provisions of the erstwhile foreign exchange regulation act, 1973.1. the enforcement directorate conducted search and seizure operations in 1996 at the various offices and factories premises of the assessee and the residence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2012 (HC)

Dipak Kumar Himatsingka Vs. Jyotsana Rajgarhia and Another

Court : Kolkata

..... application of mind concluded that there was sufficient cause to condone the delay. fifthly, the hon'ble court did not rely upon section 17 of the limitation act. therefore, condonation of delay was without jurisdiction and also without sufficient cause and should be set aside. the petition for revocation should be dismissed as barred ..... rajgarhia) probate was obtained by dipak kumar himatsingka without proving the same solemnly and without consent. hence, application was filed under section 263 of indian succession act.under section 263 the probate was liable to be revoked being just cause. in the said section it is provided that such just cause shall be deemed ..... of administration or succession certificate must be made after the deceaseds death. the law on the point can be summarised thus:- (1) under the limitation act no period is advisedly prescribed within an application for probate, letters of administration or succession certificate must be made; (2) the assumption that under art. 137 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2014 (HC)

Satyanarayan Pasari Vs. Ashok Kumar Pasari and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... brothers and the sister. the defendant no.2 did not sign the document. in any event of the plaintiff in his evidence established that the memorandum of understanding was not acted upon and not given effect to. considering the evidence on record the plaintiff was entitled to a decree in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the plaint. ..... defendant no.2 did not join the memorandum of understanding and did not sign the same. in any event, according to the plaintiff, the memorandum of understanding was never acted upon and put to execution. so far as the firs.floor flat was concerned it was submitted on behalf of the plaintiff that, the plaintiff was in occupation of such ..... years old. it should be presumed that the signature or any of the other part of such document was proved under the provisions of section 90 of the indian evidence act, 1872. the original deed of lease was in the custody of the plaintiff. the original deed of lease being lost the plaintiff was entitled to produce a certified copy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2014 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax,koli Vs. Sharda Commercial Company Ltd

Court : Kolkata

..... 'ble justice soumitra pal the hon'ble justice debangsu basak date : 11th september, 2014. ms.s.das de, advocate the court : this appeal under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 has been preferred against the order dated 30th january, 2014 passed by the income tax appellate tribunal c bench, kolkata in ita no.1657/kol/2011 for the assessment ..... parties and those sundry creidtors were outstanding and assessee has not written off those creditors u/s.133(6) of the act as of the assessee. all the parties have confirmed these sundry creditors u/s.133(6) of the act as notices were issued by the ao as replied by these sundry creditors.once this is position, the sundry creditors cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //