Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: kolkata Page 10 of about 2,450 results (0.141 seconds)

Apr 19 2002 (HC)

Tirupati Fileres and Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT95(HC),2003(155)ELT242(Cal)

..... the petitioners namely, non-cellulosic synthetic wastes blended with viscose has been sought to be classified under item 18(iii)(ii) of the first schedule to central excise and salt act, 1944. initially the aforesaid product was classified, filed under item no. 18(iii)(i) and he same was cleared upon payment of excise duty related to the aforesaid classification. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2007 (HC)

Smt. Asoka Mitra Vs. Sri Swapan Kumar Mitra

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)3CALLT503(HC),I(2008)DMC388

..... the ground specified in clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 13, the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at condoned the act or acts complained of, or where the ground of the petition is cruelty, the petitioner has not in any manner condoned the cruelty.31. in our considered view, the ground ..... cannot constitute the ground of cruelty for which a decree can be passed assaulting the matrimonial tie between the parties, as we are of the view that the said acts of cruelty were also condoned by the respondent (husband) who by his letters dated 15th november, 1998 requested the appellant (wife) to come back to the matrimonial house ..... ) filed a suit for divorce against the defendant/appellant (wife) on the ground of cruelty and desertion under section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the hindu marriage act, 1955.2. the case which was made out by the plaintiff/respondent (husband) in the said suit, is narrated briefly hereunder:3. the marriage between the parties was solemnised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2006 (HC)

Ashok Kothari Vs. Dipti Bavishi

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2007Cal21

..... in that proceeding got in touch with the appellant and made diverse enquiries. the appellant was obliged to disclose this subsequent fact under section 279 of the indian succession act because an allegation to the contrary made in paragraph 11 of the application for probate ceased to be true. similarly the allegation made in paragraph 7 that his ..... grant is unexceptionable. all that would now happen is that the propounder would be required to prove the will per testes.22. under section 268 of the indian succession act the proceedings of court, in relation to the granting of probate and letters of administration, are required to be regulated by the code of civil procedure. section 283 ..... accordingly, the caveat is discharged.let there be an order in terms of prayer (a) to this application.i make no order as to costs.all parties are to act on a signed copy of the minutes of this order on the usual undertaking.11. the prayers made in the application for discharge of caveat are as follows:(a) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2005 (HC)

Lachman Show and ors. Vs. Kalyani Sarkar

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(2)CHN58

..... observing that such entry was made by the concerned officer in the discharge of his official duties and, therefore, it is clearly admissible under section 35 of the evidence act. i must observe that this reported case too, is not relevant for deciding the question in issue, that is to say, whether the report submitted by the ..... learned advocate for the opposite party has referred to the case of madamanchi rameppa and anr. v. muthalura bojjappa reported in : [1964]2scr673 . head note (b):evidence act, 1872 section 77 - certified copy of public document is admissible in evidence without being proved by calling a witness, no objection raised to move either in trial court or ..... submitted by the police in connection with the aforesaid proceeding under section 145 cr. pc is certainly a public document within the meaning of section 74 of the evidence act. section 2(1)(h) cr. pc defines public officer, inter alia, to mean every officer in the service or pay of the government or remunerated by fees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2008 (HC)

Asansol Durgapur Development Authority and anr. Vs. Tapas Banerjee and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2009)1CALLT59(HC),2008(4)CHN297

..... rights of the relations only to those known under the said law as heirs/relatives and therefore, assignment to strangers is barred under the said provisions of 1993 act.25. accordingly, we find that there is substance in submission made by mr. mitra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants in the matter and accordingly ..... relied upon a decision reported in : 1990crilj1756 , state of madhya pradesh and ors. v. rameshwar rathod, where the court held that section 4 of the amendment act, 1974 is only prospective and not retrospective. not only that, there are no specific words to indicate the provisions of retrospective effect.22. after considering the facts and ..... for such transfer on such condition and in such form as may be prescribed.10. disposal of government land by lessee.- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act, a lessee, who intends to dispose of any government land held by him on lease for pecuniary or other compelling reasons but who is unable to dispose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2012 (HC)

M/S. Imeco Limited Vs. M/S. Beml Ltd. and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... 3- tier railway coaches and sleeper class rail coaches running within the jurisdiction of southern railway. the petitioner was a company within the meaning of companies act, 1956 having its registered office at imeco house, budge trunk road, dakghar, maheshtala, kolkata-700141 with its workshop situated at kharagpur. the respondent ..... no.1 was a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 as a public sector undertaking for manufacturing rail coaches, spare parts and mining equipments. the government of india owned 54% of total equity shares ..... the senior divisional mechanical engineer, southern railway disclosed under its communication dated october 31, 2011 on the basis of an application under right to information act, 2005 that the payment in connection with retrenchment of longitudinal of middle berth in ac 3-tier and sleeper coaches would be released on specific .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2014 (HC)

…applicants. Vs. Bhagwati Developers Private Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... was precluded from raising the grounds of delay and maintainability. nevertheless, peerless was allowed to contend that the petition under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956 were not maintainable as the chatterjee brothers had withdrawn the appeals. sometime in may, 1996, bhagwati filed two appeals, which were registered as a.p ..... of this court on november 24, 2003, disposed of aforesaid appeals holding, inter alia, that as the original application under sections 397 and 398 of the said act was not maintainable, the appeals were, also, not maintainable. bhagwati again went to supreme court of india with applications for special leave to appeal. the leave ..... of the chatterjee brothers in the proceeding and, also, accorded permission to the bhagwati to proceed with the application under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956. the parties were granted liberty to bring on record the subsequent events, if they were so advised. there were four special leave petitions in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2015 (HC)

Saurabh Ghosal Vs. Smt. Anupama Roy Choudhury

Court : Kolkata

..... the property in question would have devolved on the same person who is the beneficiary under the will, by operation of section 15(2)(a) of the hindu succession act. no case has been made out that execution of the will is shrouded in suspicious circumstances. all the requirements of law for making and publishing a valid will are ..... related to the person who originally held the property would acquire right to inherit that property. that would defeat the intent and purpose of section 15(2) of the act which gives a special pattern of succession. hence, i find nothing unnatural with the bequest under the will in question. the second point of objection raised in dipendu s ..... , calcutta being the subject matter of the bequest is admittedly a property inherited by the testatrix from her father. under section 15(2)(a) of the hindu succession act, such property inherited from the father by any hindu lady shall devolve in the absence of any son or daughter or children of any pre-deceased son or daughter, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1944 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Ajit Kumar Ghosh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1945Cal159

..... before the committing magistrate, it must nevertheless be remembered that this application of section 288 of the code is 'subject to the provisions of the evidence act, 1872.' in substance the prosecution sought to contradict the evidence given by baser before the trial judge by a portion of his statement made before the ..... which therefore should not have been admitted in evidence.14. further, 13 depositions of prosecution witnesses before the committing magistrate were filed under section 145, evidence act, apparently for the purpose of contradicting some portion of the testimony which these witnesses gave before the learned judge. in the case of the majority of these ..... which he was recorded as having made before the committing magistrate. there was there fore no compliance with section 145, evidence act, and these previous statements should not therefore have been admitted in evidence. in bal gangadhar tilak v. sriniwas ('15) 2 a.i.r. 1915 p.c. 7 the judicial committee of the privy .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2005 (HC)

Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik Samity and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN596

..... the matter of legislation in the field, keeping in mind the example of tamil nadu the department of municipal affairs, government of west bengal is contemplating to amend the municipal act making it compulsory to provide for rain water harvesting in structures/selected buildings in the municipal areas.12. we have no reason to dispute the bona fides of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //