Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 577 results (3.845 seconds)

Amit Kohli and ors. Vs. Sumeet Walia and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC265

..... -s/6 of 2008 was preferred by the decree holder-respondent in the court of the learned additional district judge, shimla, under section 15(2) of the contempt of courts act, 1971 for referring the matter to this court for initiating proceedings of criminal contempt. the learned court noticed the entire sequence of litigation from the filing of the suit, dismissal .....

Deepak Kumar and anr. and Simone Nobili and anr. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... at the time of certification, per testimony of pw-4 asi bhim sen, for certification, under section 52(a) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, it cannot be said with certainty that the stuff, which was deposited with pw-10 mhc nand lal and then produced before the additional chief judicial magistrate ..... the parcel containing the bulk, which was produced before him, for the purpose of certification, under section 52(a) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, was bearing any mark, leave alone his testifying any specific mark.16. parcel containing the bulk sealed with the seal of additional chief judicial magistrate, ..... produced the parcel containing bulk before the additional chief judicial magistrate, with an application for certification, under section 52(a) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, also stated that the parcel was marked 'a-3'. however, in the inventory ex. pw-4/b submitted to the additional chief judicial magistrate alongwith the .....

Chaman Lal Vs. Shree Gopal Impex (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... maintainability of the suit, in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations made in this judgment. the application under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 stands dismissed. 25. appearing parties, through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the court below on 4.5.2009. the court below ..... co., : air2006sc2800 , and it was held that the expression 'first statement on the substance of the dispute' contained in section 8(1) of the 1996 act must be contra-distinguished with the expression 'written statement'. it implies submission of the party to the jurisdiction of the judicial authority. what is, therefore, needed is ..... section (2), in an arbitration with three arbitrators, each party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two appointed arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator. (4) if the appointment procedure in sub-section (3) applies and-(a) a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty .....

Om Raj Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4159

..... person assaulted is concerned, but still there may be cases in which the culprit would be liable under this section. what the court has to see is whether the act, irrespective of its result, was done with the intention or knowledge and under circumstances mentioned in the section. if the injury inflicted has been with the avowed object or ..... irrelevant for adjudging the culpability under section 307,, ipc. it is sufficient to justify a conviction under section 307 if there is present an intent coupled with some overt act in execution thereof. whether there was intention to kill or knowledge that death will be caused is a question of fact and would depend on the facts of a ..... as to whether the essential ingredients constituting an offence under section 307 i.p.c. have been proved or not, the court has to see as to whether the act, irrespective of its result, was done with the intention or knowledge and under circumstances mentioned in the section. an attempt in order to be criminal need not be .....

Leela Sood and ors. Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC498

..... petition are that the respondent-landlord, hereinafter referred to as the landlord for convenience sake, has filed a petition under section 14 of the h.p. urban rent control act, 1987 against the petitioners-tenants, hereinafter referred to as the tenants for convenience sake, in the court of learned rent controller, court no. 3, shimla.3. ..... the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present petition, as alleged? opr6. whether the petitioner is estopped from filing the present petition on account of his own acts, deed, conduct, etc. as alleged? opr7. relief.the learned rent controller has recorded the following findings on the issues framed:issue no. 1: yes.issue no. ..... rent is payable for any premises and includes-(a) such sub-tenants and other persons as have derived title under a tenant before the coming into operation of this act; (b) any person remaining, after the determination of the lease, in possession, with or without the assent of the landlord, of the premises leased to such .....

Surender Paul Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.4.2007 passed by the director consolidation in proceedings under section 54 of the h.p. land (consolidation and fragmentation) act, 1971 whereby he rejected the revision petition filed by the petitioner. 2. it is not disputed that the petitioner is owner of land measuring 1-17-10 bighas comprised in .....

Bal Krishnan Sharma Vs. Tek Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2007)BC138,2006CriLJ1993

..... j.1. would a cheque issued after the date of closure of an account in a bank fall within the mischief of section 138 of the negotiable instruments act ('act' for short) is the question which calls for an answer in this petition.2. undisputed facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are:the respondent tek ..... ram, hereinafter referred to as the ('accused') approached the petitioner bal krishan sharma ('complainant' for short) in september, 1996 for a loan of rupees one lakh saying that he required this amount to discharge his previous liability with ..... a meaning which will 'advance the remedy and suppress the mischief. 11. further, while interpreting the statutory provision rule dealing with penalty under the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 and the rules in the case of swantraj v. state of maharashtra 1974 cri lj 472, this court held that every legislation is a social document .....

Baldev Singh and Kuldeep K. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC235

..... 173 has 9 clauses and annexures. for the purposes of entitlement and disbursement of disability pension, clause (2), clause (4) and clause (7) of appendix-ii is relevant. the army act, 1950 (section 192) empowers the central government to frame regulations for defence personnel. clause (ii) clearly stipulates that disablement or death shall be accepted as due to military service provided ..... in national life, the central government has also come out with a comprehensive legislation which is commonly known as 'persons and disabilities, equal opportunity, protection of rights and other participation act', 1995. the petitioners are not seeking any relief in terms of this statute. but be that as it may the fact of the matter that keeping in view the various .....

Smt. Padma Devi and Another Vs. Smt. Soma Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... his signature and date on document under section 59 and then certified under section 50. a presumption by reference to section 114 (illustration (e)) of the evidence act shall arise to the effect that the events contained in the endorsement of registration, were regularly and duly performed and are correctly recorded. none of the endorsements, ..... representatives. the signature on the original cannot be proved by production of a certified copy. nor can the courts raise any presumption under section 90 of the evidence act in that regard- see harihar prasad singh and another vs. mst. of munshi nath prasad and others. the high court and the 1st appellate court erroneously ..... dated by the registering officer, and shall then be admissible for the purpose of proving that the document has been duty registered in manner provided by this act, and that the facts mentioned in the endorsements referred to in section 59 have occurred as therein mentioned.sh.gupta has placed reliance on the judgment of .....

Roop Ram and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC165

..... the respondents has submitted that since the petitioners' land has already been taken into possession prior to the issuance of the notification under section 4 of the 'act', therefore that cannot be treated and acknowledged as legally authorized possession and in view of the observations made by the supreme court in lila ghosh (smt.) ..... owner is entitled while determining the compensation amount payable to the land owner for the acquisition of the property. the provision of section 48 of the act lend support to such a course of action. for delayed payment of such amount appropriate interest at prevailing bank rate may be awarded.9. learned counsel ..... cases under section 17 where by invoking urgency clause possession has been taken before the acquisition proceedings are initiated. in such cases, compensation, under the land acquisition act, would be payable by virtue of the provisions of section 17. as in cases under section 17 compensation is payable, interest may run from the date .....