Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: delhi Page 18 of about 24,621 results (0.204 seconds)

Oct 17 2017 (HC)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.electricity Generation Incorporati ...

Court : Delhi

..... and to restrain the beneficiary from fao (os) (comm) 184 & 185/2017 page 11 of 13 the right under enforcing the guarantee. concerning jurisdiction under the consumer protection act, in the decision reported as (1999) 8 scc357union bank of india v. seppo rally oy the supreme court held that the consumer fora at the place where the office of ..... next milestone was to be achieved by the plaintiff by october 2017. further, the conduct of defendant no.1 in invoking the said performance bank guarantee is clearly an act of deliberate deception in order to secure an amount which was not due to them since defendant no.1 have themselves not performed their obligations under the contract and ..... main contract as well. the plaintiff to approach xxxx fao (os) (comm) 184 & 185/2017 page 4 of 13 25. it is clear from the record that the acts of defendant no.1 by invoking the performance bank guarantee communicated to the plaintiff through the email from defendant no.3 dated 9th march 2017 on the basis of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2017 (HC)

Ranjeet Kumar @ Jeetu vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... who examined her. moreover, the status report reveals that the petitioner is involved in another fir no.11/2016, dated 05.01.2016, under sectionsof the ipc and 8 pocso act registered at police station, r. k. puram.11. keeping in view the principle laid by the apex court, aforementioned facts and circumstances, as well as taking into consideration the gravity ..... petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in fir no.443/2016 under sections 363/341/354 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & 8 of the pocso act registered at police station r. k. puram.2. the case of the prosecution is that on 30.10.2016, nagma complainant approached the police station, r.k. puram and stated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2017 (HC)

Surinder @ Bhola vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... reasoning and reaches a logical conclusion as the most probable position. the above principle has gained legislative recognition in india when section 114 is incorporated in the evidence act. it empowers the court to presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened. in that process the court shall have regard to ..... imparted on the neck of the deceased, the arms of the deceased were caught hold by another person(s), leading to bruises. therefore, the appellant was not acting alone. the assistance could very well be from the other inmates of the matrimonial house, however, that question has neither been investigated by the police nor dealt with ..... be on the prosecution, however, the principles of circumstantial evidence need not be applied in the strictest sense, inasmuch as, under section 106 of the indian evidence act, 1872, there would be corresponding burden on the accused to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed.25. pw-9, the elder brother .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2018 (HC)

Anita Khanna & Ors vs.reserve Bank of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... . having said so, as indicated above, respondent no.1/ rbi being the regulator of the banking system in the country will ensure that respondent no.2 bank acts in accordance with the directives contained in the aforementioned circular and other extant guidelines/ circulars issued by it.11. accordingly, the writ petition of along with all interlocutory ..... to enforce its rights under the loan agreement by taking recourse to provision of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 (for short the act ).5. it is not disputed before me that some amount of money is outstanding against loan taken by the late husband of petitioner no.1. ..... as the impugned notices ) issued by the respondent no.2 under section 13 (2) of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 as non-est and void w.e.f. 04/01/2018 on account of failure of the respondent no.2 to respond to the objections filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2018 (HC)

Annat Jain & Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... no.1. (iii) in order to enable the petitioners to do the needful, inclusion of their names in the list of directors disqualified under section 164(2)(a) of the act for the relevant financial years as indicated in annexure p-1 shall remain stayed till 31.3.2018. (iv) furthermore, petitioners din and dsc shall be w.p.(c) 1621 ..... 5. the petitioners inter alia aver that they were disqualified by respondent no.2 from aforementioned companies for falling foul of the provisions of section 164(2)(a) of the act, on account of their failure to file the requisite financial statements/annual reports. 5.1 it is stated that the order disqualifying petitioner no.1 and 2 was passed without ..... the petitioners have averred in the writ w.p.(c) 1621/2018 page 1 of 4 petition that an appeal has been preferred under section 252 of the companies act, 2013 (in short act ) with the national company law tribunal, new delhi (in short nclt ) with regard to the action taken by respondent no.2 in striking off the name of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Mr. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the scheme.15. in addition thereto, for the moment, respondent no.w.p.(c) 844/2018 page 3 of 4 1/registrar of companies will also ..... will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner as well.13. the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the scheme within a period of two weeks from today.14. in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned list (annexure p-1), insofar ..... 8. it is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner wishes to take recourse to the provision of section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013 (in short the act) 9. furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the w.p.(c) 844/2018 page 2 of 4 petitioner would also like to avail of the benefit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2018 (HC)

Hitender Kumar vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... and about 2015.4. the petitioner, being aggrieved by the fact that he was not paid the bonus and increment for 2014, took recourse to the right to information act, 2005 (rti act) to seek information qua these aspects. 4.1 an application for this purpose was preferred by the petitioner on 22.2.2015. the cpio (mea), however, declined to ..... petitioner vide his order dated 30.3.2015, on the ground that the petitioner was an australian national. in this behalf, the cpio (mea) relied upon the provisions of rti act. 4.2 being dissatisfied, the petitioner preferred an appeal with the first appellate authority via the online portal of dopt. the appeal met the same fate. 4.3 the ..... of 4 in view of the above, it is proposed that we may dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complainant is not empowered to seek information under the rti act, 2005 which is applicable to indian citizens only. (emphasis is mine) 6. apparently, this proposal was counter signed by member, cic. it is this order which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2018 (HC)

Dr Pawan Lal & Another vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... . accordingly, the application stands disposed of. test.cas. 5/2013 1. present petition has been filed by the petitioners under section 272 read with section 278 of the indian succession act for grant of letters of administration in respect of will dated 02nd december, 2009 executed by late smt. shakuntala devi w/o pandit dwarka nath sharma.2. it has been ..... confidence.15. this court is further of the opinion that the will dated 02nd december, 2009, marked as ex.pwcomplies with the requirements of section 63 of the indian succession act, 1925. it has been duly signed by the testator and her signatures are so placed that it is clear that it was intended thereby to give effect to the writing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2018 (HC)

Dinesh Kothari & Ors vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... gupta, advs.for r-1 to 4 mr. c. mukund, mr. m.b. elakkunanan and ms. geethika mitta, advs. for r-5 coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice c.hari shankar judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice1 this writ petition was filed on 28th november, 2015 complaining of violations of the provisions of foreign exchange management ..... act, 1999 (fema) and the fdi policies framed by the department of industrial policy and promotion (dipp) (respondent no.2 herein) seeking the following prayers : 1. conduct an inquiry/investigation into ..... which is hereby disposed of. cm no.2826/2016 in view of the disposal of the petition, this application does not survive for adjudication and is dismissed. april16 2018/kr acting chief justice c.hari shankar, j w.p.(c)no.692/2016 page 4 of 4

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2018 (HC)

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... ... petitioners had been prosecuted for the admitted patent violations of statutory provisions inter-alia as laid down under the regulations, provisions of the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 in addition to violating the duty owed towards every visitor under common law, in the capacity of being an "occupier", as detailed in sushil ..... to prove crl.m.c22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 page 102 of 142 the that... petitioner caused the incident by committing any criminally negligent or rash act. at the most, the... petitioner maybe held responsible for civil negligence. further, in sushil ansal's case, manmohan uniyal, the gatekeeper, was convicted for the ..... . gauri rishi vide her complaint to the commissioner of police. pertinently only general allegations of negligence against management and staff of hyatt and no specific overt act is attributed to the... petitioner herein. admittedly, ms. gauri rishi is not an eyewitness and only reached the spot subsequently and as stated earlier did .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //