Court : Delhi
..... death was the subject matter of cruelty soon before death .19. to constitute an offence under section 304b ipc of dowry death, the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act cannot be raised against an accused until independently the offence under section 498a ipc is proved by leading evidence to the specific allegation with regard to time and date of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... death was the subject matter of cruelty soon before death .19. to constitute an offence under section 304b ipc of dowry death, the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act cannot be raised against an accused until independently the offence under section 498a ipc is proved by leading evidence to the specific allegation with regard to time and date of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... is reproduced hereinbelow:-" consequently, till further orders, defendants, its its principal officers, proprietors, partners or directors, servants, employees and agents and all other acting for and on behalf of the defendants are restrained from using, advertising, offering for sale or otherwise directly or indirectly dealing in any goods or services ..... the b) defendant and, their proprietors, partners or directors, as the case may be, its principal officers, servants, and agents, and all others acting for and on behalf of the defendants, from advertising, and directly or indirectly dealing in any services or businesses whatsoever, under the trademark, trade name ..... restraining the defendant, and their proprietors, partners or directors, as the case may be, its principal officers, servants, and agents, and all others acting for and on behalf of the defendants, from advertising, and directly or indirectly dealing in any services or businesses whatsoever, under the trademark, trade name .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014 (hereinafter the act ), thus, the petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various w.p.(c).4471/2017 page 1 of 4 receipts/challans of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. ms.taneja further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... neither holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014(hereinafter the act ), thus, the petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans w.p.(c).4546/2017 page 1 of 4 of the years 1985, 1986, 1989 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. mr. kumar further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... neither holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014 (hereinafter the act ), thus, the petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans of the years 1993, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, w.p.(c).4831/2017 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. mr.garg further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... to suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally undisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view. (emphasis supplied) 59. in ..... suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally indisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view.15. in support of ..... normally understood. the evidence adduced by the prosecution does not, therefore, show that any demand for "dowry" as defined in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act was made by the appellants as what was allegedly asked for was some money for meeting domestic expenses and for purchasing manure. 12. learned senior counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... to suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally undisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view. (emphasis supplied) 59. in ..... suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally indisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view.15. in support of ..... normally understood. the evidence adduced by the prosecution does not, therefore, show that any demand for "dowry" as defined in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act was made by the appellants as what was allegedly asked for was some money for meeting domestic expenses and for purchasing manure. 12. learned senior counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... to suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally undisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view. (emphasis supplied) 59. in ..... suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. it is equally indisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. while dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view.15. in support of ..... normally understood. the evidence adduced by the prosecution does not, therefore, show that any demand for "dowry" as defined in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act was made by the appellants as what was allegedly asked for was some money for meeting domestic expenses and for purchasing manure. 12. learned senior counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , tis hazari, delhi. she lodged a complaint with caw cell which culminated into the said fir. the petitioner no.1 had preferred a petition under section 13 of hindu marriage act, 1955 for divorce before family court, jhansi, up, which was transferred to the court of learned principal judge, family court, tis hazari, delhi by the hon ble supreme court of .....
Tag this Judgment!