Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 56 minor punishments Court: central administrative tribunal cat principal bench new delhi Page 1 of about 8 results (0.371 seconds)

May 13 2013 (TRI)

Atma Prakash Dixit Sfa (M), Office of the Inspector General and Others ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2013 (TRI)

VipIn Rathi Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Through Dy. Commissioner o ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... prosecution, formal vitality whereof has been admitted by the counsel for the accused persons under section 294 cr.p.c., have not been got proved under the evidence act. prosecution has absolutely failed to prove the charge framed by the court against the accused persons from the evidences produced by the prosecution. charge made against the accused ..... case and the limitation period of filing an appeal has also expired. further, it is mentioned that another case no.757/2010 under section-12 of domestic violence act is pending in the court of metropolitan magistrate, kanpur in which the applicant is also one of the accused. therefore, a request has been made vide this ..... associates and also attacked the complaint thereby causing injuries on his head. during trial of the case the main pws did not support the case of prosecution. your act is calculated for the post of constable (exe.) male in delhi police is hereby cancelled with immediate effect. 2. according to the said show cause notice, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2013 (TRI)

Sauranshu Sinha and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... when the right of the applicants had already accrued. shri gupta emphatically claimed that the applicants herein are indeed aggrieved persons in terms of administrative tribunals act, 1985 as about 760 persons have been added over and above the applicants in violation of the statutory recruitment rules. the applicants are eligible in law ..... which has been raised against the maintainability of the applications is that the applicants are not persons aggrieved in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. this section, inter alia, provides that a person aggrieved by any order pertaining to any matter within the jurisdiction of the tribunal may make ..... to be dismissed at the very threshold on the technical preliminary objection of they being not aggrieved persons in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. we, therefore, do not find any substance in the preliminary objection raised by the respondents that these applications are not maintainable for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2013 (TRI)

Neeraj Singh Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... proceeding only on the allegations, which constitute misconduct. a case had been instituted by the cbi under section 13(1)(d), 13(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1988 read with section 120-b ipc against the applicant and the said viren ahuja. the matter had been thoroughly inquired not only in respect of securing employment ..... secured employment on 01.07.2002, willfully concealing the fact that he had previous official dealings with one of the firms directors, shri viren ahuja. by his aforementioned act, he failed to maintain absolute integrity; devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner which is becoming of a govt. servant thereby rule 3(i) r/w ..... an employment in m/s. r. tech system (india) pvt. ltd., with which he had official dealings, without obtaining previous sanction of the government. by his aforementioned act, he failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner which is unbecoming of a govt. servant thereby violated rule 3(1) r/w .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2012 (TRI)

Ms.Akta Gulati and Others Vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... 10 staff nurses were relieved from that hospital through office order dated 09.03.2009, and they were asked to report to the medical superintendent of chacha nehru bal chikistsalaya, shastri nagar, and they have been working in that second hospital on contractual basis since then. she has pointed out that those 10 staff nurses, ..... respondents for redressal of his grievance, and since he has not exhausted the remedies by making a representation to the respondents, under section 20 of the at act, the oa should be dismissed in limine for not exhausting the alternative remedies before approaching the tribunal. in this context, the respondents had cited the judgment of ..... applicants have not exhausted the alternative remedies available to them and rushed to this tribunal and therefore, the oas are not maintainable under section 20 of the at act, 1985, and (2) that there is no violation of the terms of their contract, as already provided in the letter of offer of engagement on contractual .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2012 (TRI)

Gurmej Singh, Cmd (Og) Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Min. of D ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... has been working with the commanding officer, `c coy 5682 asc bn (mt), pathankot. it is also seen that the respondents have considering persons enrolled under the act but not attested for the purpose of discharge under rule 13 of the army rules, 1954. the respondents have in fact imposed the following punishments upon the applicant ..... government of india in the late war department no. 1584 dated the 29th june 1946, the central government is pleased to apply all the provisions of the said act to civil general transport companies and independent transport platoons (civ gt) being a force raised and maintained in india under the authority of the central government. they ..... is concerned, the respondents have stated that the applicant is covered by ao 141/72 issued by the army which reads as under: discipline application of the army act to civil general transport companies and independent transport platoons (civ gt). 1. gazette of india notification no. sro 122 dated 22 jul 50, as amended by sro .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (TRI)

Prem Singh and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner o ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it is thus not as if ..... his wife smt.rampati was also sitting with him. suddenly you along with narayan, bharal lal s.o ram nath, jella ram s/o sunder lal all resident of bal ki dhani, mundiyawas, the. thana gazi distt. alwar (raj.) having lathies in their hands came to his house and pappu ram, ramesh, narayan, bharat lal, jella ..... moral turpitude, disentitling the convict to public employment; 33. we are a little surprised at the list as it excludes offences such as promoting enmity or doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony i.e. offences punishable under section 153-a ipc. it excludes offences pertaining to mutiny and its abetment i.e. offences under sections .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (TRI)

S. Rajguru Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... in the mind of such quasi-judicial authorities. we are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the applicants action being of quasi-judicial nature and having acted as a quasi-judicial authority, his decisions in those four cases, wherein no malafide, arbitrariness or question of integrity has been raised, cannot be treated as ..... wrongly exercised his jurisdiction. but that wrong can be corrected in appeal. that cannot always form basis for initiating disciplinary proceedings for an officer while he is acting as quasi judicial authority. it must be kept in mind that being a quasi judicial authority, he is always subject to judicial supervision in appeal. 42 ..... of zunjarrao bhikaji nagarkar vs. union of india and others [1999 -7-scc-409] under central excise rules, 1944 rule173q; section 11ac of the central excise act, 1944 and rule14 of central civil services (classification control and appeal) rules, 1965 where two principal issues arose for the consideration of honble supreme court: (1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2013 (TRI)

Narayana Rao Battu Deputy Legislative Counsel New Delhi Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... should not be treated as a fresh vacancy. the government has accepted the said recommendations and issued directions to the ministries/ departments accordingly for future compliance. the respondent no.1 acted accordingly and vide its letter dated 16.11.2004, requested the upsc to provide a substitute from its reserve panel. thereafter, the upsc, vide its letter dated 27.12.2004 ..... . the aforesaid representation was examined in the department and the factual position was noted. according to copy of the departmental note made available to the applicant under right to information act, 2005, it is observed that the respondent no.1 has re-considered the seniority position of the applicant as well as respondent no.2. it has been observed in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //