Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: chennai Page 6 of about 124 results (0.252 seconds)

The National Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager Vs. ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... (v) in reshma kumari and others v. madan mohan reported in (2009) 13 scc 422, the hon'ble apex court reiterated that the compensation awarded under the act should be just and also identified the factors which should be kept in mind while determining the amount of compensation. the relevant portions of the judgment are extracted below: the ..... observations which can appropriately be applied for deciding the petitions filed under section 166 of the act: we must emphasise that the court has to strike a balance between the inflated and unreasonable demands of a victim and the equally untenable claim of the ..... (sc), the hon'ble supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act, 1986. while enhancing the compensation awarded by the national consumer disputes redressal commission from rs.15 lakhs to rs.1 crore, the hon'ble bench made the following .....

The Branch Manager, Iffco Tokyo General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sam ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... debnath reported in 1995 acj 980, high court of gauhati has held in paragraph 6 as follows: "the law is well settled that in a claim under the motor vehicles act, the evidence should not be scrutinised in a manner as is done in a civil suit or a criminal case. in a civil case the rule is preponderance of probability ..... (prayer: appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 26.08.2015 in mcop.no.639 of 2014 on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal, ii additional district judge, tirunelveli.) .....

Welcome Match Works Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1994(71)ELT884(Mad)

..... and (vii) packing. 5. the petitioners herein are manufacturers of matches which is an excisable commodity falling under item 38 of first schedule to the central excises and salt act. as stated earlier, there are broadly three classes of manufacturers. they being (1) mechanised sector, (2) semi-mechanised sector and (3) non-mechanised sector. the ..... are conferred on the government in the matter of granting exemptions, any particular order could be questioned if it was contrary to the provisions of the act or that the conditions imposed thereunder for getting the concessions are neither germane nor relevant to the particular item in respect of which the condition was imposed ..... or that it was not consistent with the operative provisions of the act itself. it was also brought to the notice of the division bench of number of instances where the exemption was based on the process of manufacture, .....

M. Palani Vs. the Executive Engineer, Anti Power theft Squad, Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ124

..... should not be visited with an order of dismissal. for this, reliance was placed on standing order 20(c). standing order 19(xxii) reads as follows:19. acts and omissions constituting misconduct....(xxii) act/acts resulting in conviction in any court of law for any criminal offence involving moral turpitude.standing order 20(c) reads as follows:20. punishment for misconduct....(c) if .....

The Special Officer, Dharmapuri District Co. Op. Sugar Mills Vs. T.N. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ407Mad; (2003)3MLJ503

..... making him permanent, are questions which have to be resolved by raising a dispute before the appropriate forum. 9. section 2(k) of the industrial disputes act recites as under:-'industrial dispute' means any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is ..... promotion and other benefits. therefore, the availability of the rights and benefits for which the plaintiffs make a claim be said to be flowing only under the industrial disputes act and therefore, the civil court's jurisdiction has to be ousted impliedly.'12. in rajasthan state road transport corp. & anr. etc. v. krishna kant etc. : ..... herein as also the suits and proceedings to be instituted hereinafter.' 13. a dispute which can be agitated only in a forum created under the industrial disputes act, cannot be adjudicated for resolving such grievance before civil court, which will have no jurisdiction to entertain a suit. the position as on date is an .....

Union of India Vs. N.Lavanya

Court : Chennai

..... 05.2003. however, we are not in agreement with the contra view taken by the central administrative tribunal, chennai that even though the respondents (petitioners) have acted in accordance with the rules and statutory instructions, considering the fact that the delay has occurred for want of vacancies within the ceiling of 5% for compassionate ground ..... 2007 stating that she should file an appeal to the chief commissioner of the central excise, chennai, who being the appellate authority, under the right to information act, 2005. therefore, an appeal dated 10.07.2007 has been made to the chief commissioner of central excise, chennai and in reply to that the chief ..... not possible to be offered, his/her case will be finally closed and will not be considered etc. and also opined that even though the respondents have acted in accordance with the rules and statutory instructions, considering the fact that the delay has occurred for want of vacancies within the ceiling of 5% for compassionate .....

Jayachandran Alias J.J.Chandru. Vs. K.Jagan Mohan

Court : Chennai

..... there is no impediment for the respondent to continue the fair rent proceedings apart from any other proceedings to be taken as per the provisions of rent control act in respect of the demised building. therefore, the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/tenant as to the maintainability of the proceedings insisted ..... entitled to collect the rent, he would be called as landlord for all purpose and entitled to launch any proceedings under tamil nadu buildings lease and rent control act. moreover, the respondent was also one of the co-owners in respect of the demised building. therefore, i find no force in the argument advanced by the ..... respect of the entire property including the demised building and therefore the respondent would be considered as landlord as per the definitions under section 2(6) of the act. if the will executed by a father in favour of the respondent/tenant was probated in testamentary proceedings and the suit filed by the mother and sister .....

Al.Nallusamy. Vs. K.Jagan Mohan

Court : Chennai

..... there is no impediment for the respondent to continue the fair rent proceedings apart from any other proceedings to be taken as per the provisions of rent control act in respect of the demised building. therefore, the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/tenant as to the maintainability of the proceedings initiated ..... entitled to collect the rent, he would be called as landlord for all purpose and entitled to launch any proceedings under tamil nadu buildings lease and rent control act. moreover, the respondent was also one of the co-owners in respect of the demised building. therefore, i find no force in the argument advanced by the ..... of the entire property including the demised building and therefore the respondent would be considered as landlord as per the definitions under section 2(6) of the act. if the will executed by a father in favour of the respondent/tenant was probated in testamentary proceedings and the suit filed by the mother and sister .....

A.E. StalIn Gurumurthy and Others Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2012(8)MLJ231

..... recovered. this order, however, is being passed in exercise of the jurisdiction under article 142 of the constitution keeping in view the principles embodied in section 70 of the contract act." 61. as far as the present case is concerned, it is not the case of the respondents (union of india and others) that the benefits of revised pay scales have ..... the proceedings of the 2nd respondent/union of india dated 18.10.2001 was contrary to the provisions of acp scheme and as such, the said classification could not be acted upon because of the reason that it had no force of law. 7. the petitioners/applicants take a plea that absolutely there is no mistake, fraud or misrepresentation by them .....

Shanmuga Polytechnic College Vs. All India Council for Technical Educa ...

Court : Chennai

..... of engineering, the government of india declared the said shanmugha college of engineering as a deemed university by issuing notification under section 3 of the ugc act, 1956, which is now called sastra deemed university.11. the appellant polytechnic is offering diploma courses from the year 1984 and was granted approval ..... order. the learned senior counsel further submitted that the said approval guidelines having been framed under the powers conferred under section 23 of the aicte act, 1987, the same is having statutory force and the appellant is also bound by the said provision and unless the appellant creates separate infrastructural facilities ..... 2001, the first respondent/aicte decided to entrust the approval of diploma engineering programmes to the state government, though there is no provision in the aicte act, and the state government through the third respondent has been recognising the courses of shanmugha polytechnic college. (e) the second respondent/southern regional office of .....