Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: chennai Page 11 of about 124 results (0.260 seconds)

M. Seeni Ahamed Vs. The Union of India, represented by its Secretary, ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... whether a decision falls in the said category. by "procedural impropriety", he means not only failure to observe the basic rules of natural justice or failure to act with procedural fairness, but also failure to observe procedural rules that are expressly laid down in the legislative instrument by which the tribunal's jurisdiction is conferred ..... not persuade us, for the reason that such drastic measure has been taken by the central government to curtail the black money, corruption and various other evil acts of unscrupulous anti-social and anti-national elements. if any prior notice is so issued about the proposal to demonetize, in our considered view, that would defeat ..... transactions using the specified bank notes; now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 26 of the reserve bank of india act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the central government hereby declares that the specified bank notes shall not be ceased to be legal tender, with effect from the 9th .....

The Board of Trustee of Chennai Port Trust, Chennai Vs. M/s. Chennai C ...

Court : Chennai

..... fact to come to the conclusion that the arbitrator had acted contrary to the bargain between the parties. ... 29. it was submitted by the respondent that this hon ble court very succinctly summarised the legal principles for setting ..... not to find out whether these claims were within the disputes referable to the arbitrator, but to find out whether in arriving at the decision, the arbitrator had acted correctly or incorrectly. this, in our opinion, the court had no jurisdiction to do, namely, substitution of its own evaluation of the conclusion of law or ..... either side, dismissed the original petition. against the said order, chennai port trust has come forward with this appeal under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. 4. the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant contends that the tribunal ought not to have made chennai port trust as claimant, when cctpl was .....

J. Ramaraj Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Keeranoor Po ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... saying that he would do away with the life of the defacto complainant. in some cases, though the case under section 307 ipc is registered, neither the intention nor the act complained of could establish the offence under section 307 ipc. the motive for the occurrence, the nature of weapon used, the nature of injury sustained, period of treatment and the ..... sister presented the cheque in the bank and after presenting the same, they were returning home and on coming to know of such presentation, the petitioner, being annoyed by the act, came behind the vehicle of the de-facto complainant and attacked the de-facto complainant and her sister with iron rod and in that process, the petitioner is stated to .....

T. Thanggakolanchinathan Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Madr ...

Court : Chennai

..... departments/ public sector undertakings/ government companies declaring that the non-observance of the scheme of reservation for persons with disabilities should be considered as an act of non-obedience and the nodal officer in department/ public sector undertakings/ government companies, responsible for the proper strict implementation of reservation for person ..... that right has not yet got crystallized. we are also informed that after the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995, has come into existence in 1996, the present recruitment is the second one and there were already 11 district judges (entry level) appointed ..... by the petitioner miserably lack merits and accordingly prayed for dismissal. 20. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drawing our attention to the disabilities act, the impugned notification and also the judgment rendered by the hon'ble division bench of this court reported in 2010 (5) ctc 1 (k. .....

Surya Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ho ...

Court : Chennai

..... prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers, cyber law offenders, drug offenders, forest offenders, goondas, immoral traffic offenders, sand offenders, sexual offenders, slum grabbers and video pirates act, 1982 (tamil nadu act 14/1982) the tamil nadu act 14 of 1982, branding him as a bootlegger , in the central prison, vellore, to quash the same and to direct the respondents to produce the body ..... constitution of india praying for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the entire records, relating to petitioner's sister's son detention under tamil nadu act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 04.01.2016 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings c3.d.o.no.2/2016, quash the same .....

R. Anbazhagan Vs. The Central Bank of India, Through its Regional Mana ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... 16. it is one thing to say that the public sector banks having regard to the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 should discharge their functions keeping in mind the larger public interest but ordinarily in the matter of enforcement of contract, they are to be governed by ..... the high court at calcutta issued a writ of mandamus. though the parties therein were bound by a contract, holding that if the instrumentality of the state acts contrary to public good, public interest, unfairly, unjustly, unreasonably discriminatory and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india in its contractual or statutory obligation ..... after considering various decisions and taking note of the fact that the functions of the public prosecutor relate to public purpose entrusting him with the responsibility of acting only in the interest of administration of justice and that the office of a government pleader is a public office, the hon'ble supreme court set .....

Sukumaran Vs. Madhava Shastri (Died) and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... learned trial judge dismissed the suit. the learned judge dismissed the suit based on the averments in the plaint, section 60 (c) of the transfer of property act, 1882 and the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3. 17. the review petitioner, in fact, has ..... are in possession as owners. respondents 1 and 4 have not filed any proof that mortgage was redeemed fulfilling the ingredients of section 60 of the transfer of property act, 1882. the said section reads as follows: "60. right of mortgagor to redeem. - at any time after the principal money has become due, the mortgagor ..... the mortgagee periakaruppan. they have also not produced any document to show that ganapathi iyer discharged the mortgage as mentioned in section 60 of the transfer of property act, 1882. the respondents 1 and 4 contended that they have furnished necessary particulars in the plaint and they will substantiate their claim by acceptable oral and documentary evidence .....

1.M.Barani @ Barani Valluvan Vs. The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

..... fall within the ambit of first exception to section 300 of the indian penal code.20. in the instant case, according to the learned senior counsel, the act of the deceased in touching the chest of the girl was the cause for provocation. this argument may be accepted, because the first accused would have been ..... senior counsel for the appellants is concerned, the learned additional public prosecutor would submit that absolutely, there is no other material to hold that the accused had acted out of sustained provocation. he would further submit that the occurrence had taken place driven by the motive and that the accused had caused the injuries on ..... a juvenile and therefore, his case was split up and referred to the juvenile justice board under the provisions of the juvenile justice [care and protection of children]. act, 2000. thus, these three accused, viz., the appellants herein and one mrs.vasanthi faced the trial. they stood charged as detailed below. charge accused penal provisions .....

T.N. Civil Courts Sr. Bailiffs Asson. Rep. by Its President, N.K. Nata ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)IMLJ12

..... it is to be noticed that in exercise of the powers under the proviso to clause i of art. 229 of the constitution, the governor is not required to act with the aid and advice of the council of ministers and hence ought to give his approval to the recommendation of the hon'ble chief justice. 18. a division ..... the reasons given by the 1st respondent for not acting on the recommendations of the hon'ble chief justice are wholly untenable and cannot be sustained. 17. art. 229 of the constitution provides that any appointment of officers and ..... is s. s. l. c., and that fact is not disputed by the learned government advocate appearing for the respondents. the reason given by the 1st respondent for not acting on the recommendations made by the hon'ble chief justice of this court, according to the averments made in the counter-affidavit, are far from satisfactory. in my opinion, .....

K. Mohamed Muthu and ors. Vs. Mrs. Habeeba Beebi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC721; (2004)3MLJ84

..... points on merits, we are inclined to deal with the law on the issue regarding gift under muslim law. in view of section 129 of transfer of property act, no provision under the act is made applicable to gift by a muslim and only muslim law alone is applicable. as stated by the hon'ble mr. justice hidayathullah, in the book mulla ..... not sell the property to any one but the members of the transferor's and transferee's family (w), but void if the restraint is absolute. see transfer of property act, section 10.(d) a makes a gift of certain property to b. it is provided by the deed of gift that b shall not transfer the property. the restraint against .....