Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 42 unlawful detention of pay Page 81 of about 882 results (0.172 seconds)

Apr 18 2023 (HC)

Anjana @ Anjali And Anr Vs. The State And Anr

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... quash the complaint and fir in crime no.423/2018 of deodurga police station for the offences punishable under sections498, 504, 323 and506read with section34of ipc and sections3and4of dowry prohibitiion act, 1961, pending on the file of the court of munsiff and jmfc court, deodurga, raichur. these criminal petitions having been heard and reserved on1603.2023 coming on for pronouncement of ..... quash the complaint and fir in crime no.423/2018 of deodurga police station for the offences punishable under sections498, 504, 323 and506read with section34of ipc and sections3and4of dowry prohibitiion act, 1961, pending on the file of the court of munsiff and jmfc court, deodurga, raichur. crl.p.no.200660/2019 between1 anjana @ anjali w/o anil paspule age:41. years .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2021 (HC)

Sri Belakerappa B Vs. Smt Meenakshi

Court : Karnataka

..... at no.44, 3rd cross, sameerpura, kempegowda nagar, bangalore-560 019. ...respondent (by sri. chandraiah, advocate) 2 this r.p.f.c is filed under section194) of the family courts act, 1984 praying to set aside the order dated0803.2016 passed in c.misc.no.355/2010 by the v addl. principal judge, family court, bengaluru, and to pass such other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2014 (HC)

Shadeed Iron and Steel Llc Vs. Ores and Mineral Corporation

Court : Delhi

..... (exemption) 1. allowed subject to just exceptions. omp15542014 and ia no.24519/2014 (stay) 2. this is a petition preferred under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act) purportedly against the partial arbitral award dated 03.11.2014 . the learned arbitrator, who has passed the award, is one, mr. dato jude p. benny. the appointment has ..... be borne in mind, is that the purported partial award has been termed as a procedural order by the learned arbitrator. therefore, whether a petition under section 34 of the act would lie, may be open to debate as there has been no final determination of rights of parties; even at this interim stage. 8.1 however, notwithstanding this aspect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2014 (HC)

Kamal Kishore & Ors. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide."13. since the learned trial court has convicted the accused under section 300 clause thirdly i.e. intentionally causing ..... injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or and section 299: culpable homicide: whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that he is likely ..... this question, let us first refer to the said provisions which are reproduced as under:"section 300: except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or- (thirdly) if it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2014 (HC)

Shadeed Iron and Steel Llc Vs. Ores and Mineral Corporation

Court : Delhi

..... (exemption) 1. allowed subject to just exceptions. omp15542014 and ia no.24519/2014 (stay) 2. this is a petition preferred under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act) purportedly against the partial arbitral award dated 03.11.2014 . the learned arbitrator, who has passed the award, is one, mr. dato jude p. benny. the appointment has ..... be borne in mind, is that the purported partial award has been termed as a procedural order by the learned arbitrator. therefore, whether a petition under section 34 of the act would lie, may be open to debate as there has been no final determination of rights of parties; even at this interim stage. 8.1 however, notwithstanding this aspect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2014 (HC)

Shadeed Iron and Steel Llc Vs. Ores and Mineral Corporation

Court : Delhi

..... (exemption) 1. allowed subject to just exceptions. omp15542014 and ia no.24519/2014 (stay) 2. this is a petition preferred under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act) purportedly against the partial arbitral award dated 03.11.2014 . the learned arbitrator, who has passed the award, is one, mr. dato jude p. benny. the appointment has ..... be borne in mind, is that the purported partial award has been termed as a procedural order by the learned arbitrator. therefore, whether a petition under section 34 of the act would lie, may be open to debate as there has been no final determination of rights of parties; even at this interim stage. 8.1 however, notwithstanding this aspect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2015 (HC)

Nair Mohan Sivaram Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... swerve the vehicle, no independent evidence has been adduced to prove this aspect. the jeep driver is expected to keep a safe distance from the ongoing vehicle and if this act had followed, the accident would have been averted by him.11. it is true that the motor vehicle inspector who was examined as pw14 had stated that from the ..... of pws 3, 4 and 5 is not sufficient to attract none of the offences alleged and at the most it may amount to error of judgment and not reckless act and thereby the courts below were not justified in convicting the revision petitioner for the offences alleged. he had relied on the decisions reported in jahid shaikh and others ..... from the opposite direction driven by the deceased with pw5 as pillion rider of the scooter succumbed to the injuries while pw5 sustained grievous injuries on account of the negligent act of the revision petitioner and thereby he had committed the offences under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304 a of the indian penal code. crl.r.p.no.1178 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2004 (TRI)

In Re: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Reported in : (2004)192CTRAAR321

..... account of waiver of liquidated damages is an allowable deduction from its business income under the it act, 1961, in the assessment for the asst. yr. 2002-2003".2. on 5th april, 2004, when the application came up for hearing, the jurisdictional cit raised a preliminary objection on ..... &2 in ca no. 2058-59 of 1988 dated 11-10-1991 1. this is an application, by a public sector company, under section 245q(1) of the it act, 1961 (for short the "act"). the applicant sought advance ruling of the authority on the following question: "whether, on the stated facts, the amount refunded by the applicant-company to iti ltd. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2015 (HC)

C.K.Sajan Vs. Shri Antony Chacko

Court : Kerala

..... is why it has been held that an informant does not have a right of filing an appeal under section 19 of the act against an order refusing to initiate the contempt proceedings or disposing of the application or petition filed for initiating such proceedings. he cannot be called an aggrieved party." (emphasis added ..... is just an informer or relator. his duty ends with the facts being brought to the notice of the court. it is thereafter for the court to act on such information or not to act though the private party or litigant moving the court may at the discretion of the court continue to render its assistance during the course of proceedings. that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1985 (TRI)

Devendra Chandra JaIn (Huf) Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Reported in : (1986)15ITD312Indore

..... sharat chand jain and bipin chand jain. shri s.b. gupta also refers to us to an order dated 23-12-1983 under section 185 of the income-tax act, 1961 ('the act') in the case of devendra bros, to contend that the allocation of the shares having been made in the hands of the hufs, there was no point in ..... made no capital investment whatsoever in the partnership business which was to carry on the activity of buying and selling of real estate and flats in multistoreyed buildings and to act as commission and selling agents thereof. besides, we also significantly noticed that the huf of shri girdharilal jain continued to be intact and that when the partnership in question ..... returns filed having been accepted by the ito, even though on protective basis, had taken the assessments out of the scope of the provisions of section 246 of the act. according to him, a grievance could at the best be made by devendra chandra jain, sharat chand jain and bipin chand jain if the assessments of share incomes had .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //