Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014(hereinafter the act ), thus, the petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans w.p.(c).4546/2017 page 1 of 4 of the years 1985, 1986, 1989 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. mr. kumar further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... neither holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014 (hereinafter the act ), thus, the petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans of the years 1993, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, w.p.(c).4831/2017 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. mr.garg further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... who examined her. moreover, the status report reveals that the petitioner is involved in another fir no.11/2016, dated 05.01.2016, under sectionsof the ipc and 8 pocso act registered at police station, r. k. puram.11. keeping in view the principle laid by the apex court, aforementioned facts and circumstances, as well as taking into consideration the gravity ..... petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in fir no.443/2016 under sections 363/341/354 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & 8 of the pocso act registered at police station r. k. puram.2. the case of the prosecution is that on 30.10.2016, nagma complainant approached the police station, r.k. puram and stated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... no.1. (iii) in order to enable the petitioners to do the needful, inclusion of their names in the list of directors disqualified under section 164(2)(a) of the act for the relevant financial years as indicated in annexure p-1 shall remain stayed till 31.3.2018. (iv) furthermore, petitioners din and dsc shall be w.p.(c) 1621 ..... 5. the petitioners inter alia aver that they were disqualified by respondent no.2 from aforementioned companies for falling foul of the provisions of section 164(2)(a) of the act, on account of their failure to file the requisite financial statements/annual reports. 5.1 it is stated that the order disqualifying petitioner no.1 and 2 was passed without ..... the petitioners have averred in the writ w.p.(c) 1621/2018 page 1 of 4 petition that an appeal has been preferred under section 252 of the companies act, 2013 (in short act ) with the national company law tribunal, new delhi (in short nclt ) with regard to the action taken by respondent no.2 in striking off the name of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... respondents is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with the provisions of section 164(2) of the companies act, 2013 (act).7. to be noted, except for, the petitioner in wp(c) 1661/2018, the other petitioners are directors in other companies as well. these petitioners claim ..... anr., has taken the same view.10. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments.11. it is made clear that the directions contained therein would apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioners as well. ..... conducted by dictum infotech pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to voluntarily seeking its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the act. furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018, as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... respondents is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with the provisions of section 164(2) of the companies act, 2013 (act).7. to be noted, except for, the petitioner in wp(c) 1661/2018, the other petitioners are directors in other companies as well. these petitioners claim ..... anr., has taken the same view.10. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments.11. it is made clear that the directions contained therein would apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioners as well. ..... conducted by dictum infotech pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to voluntarily seeking its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the act. furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018, as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... respondents is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with the provisions of section 164(2) of the companies act, 2013 (act).7. to be noted, except for, the petitioner in wp(c) 1661/2018, the other petitioners are directors in other companies as well. these petitioners claim ..... anr., has taken the same view.10. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments.11. it is made clear that the directions contained therein would apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioners as well. ..... conducted by dictum infotech pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to voluntarily seeking its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the act. furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018, as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... respondents is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with the provisions of section 164(2) of the companies act, 2013 (act).7. to be noted, except for, the petitioner in wp(c) 1661/2018, the other petitioners are directors in other companies as well. these petitioners claim ..... anr., has taken the same view.10. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments.11. it is made clear that the directions contained therein would apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioners as well. ..... conducted by dictum infotech pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to voluntarily seeking its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the act. furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018, as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... union of india & anr., has taken the same view.12. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 3 of 4 13. it is made clear that the directions contained ..... exim pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to approach registrar of companies voluntarily to seek its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013. 10.1 furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018 as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a ..... .1 the stand of the respondents, is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with section 164(2)(a) of the companies act, 2013. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 2 of 4 9. to be noted, except for the petitioner in wp(c) 1663/2018, the other petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... union of india & anr., has taken the same view.12. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 3 of 4 13. it is made clear that the directions contained ..... exim pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to approach registrar of companies voluntarily to seek its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013. 10.1 furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018 as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a ..... .1 the stand of the respondents, is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with section 164(2)(a) of the companies act, 2013. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 2 of 4 9. to be noted, except for the petitioner in wp(c) 1663/2018, the other petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!