Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 42 unlawful detention of pay Page 23 of about 882 results (0.158 seconds)

Sep 18 2017 (HC)

Satya Narayan Mahato Vs. Smt Ambika Mahato

Court : Jharkhand

..... information or matter that may, in its opinion, assist it to deal effectually with dispute, whether or not the same would be otherwise evidence or admissible under indian evidence act, 1872 and has held that in the facts and circumstances of the case the report of sfsl, ranchi is received as evidence by the court under that provision of ..... .b.mangalmurti, j.this appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.07.2016 and the decree following thereupon sealed and signed on 28.07.2016 passed by shri bal mukund roy, principal judge family court, seraikella-kharsawan in matrimonial suit no. 29 of 2010 whereby the suit filed by the appellant/petitioner under section 13(1)(i) ..... and denied the pregnancy of appellant s child, she had filed a complaint case under section 498a i.p.c. and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act against the appellant, his parents and sister and had also filed a miscellaneous case demanding maintenance for herself and her minor son. she still wants to resume conjugal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2012 (HC)

Champalal S/O Chunnilal Paliwal, (Dead Through Lrs.) and Others Vs. th ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... (conduct) rules, 1967! we only observe that these conduct rules do not define what is conduct or misconduct. what type of behaviour or nature of acts/omissions are accepted and prohibited is envisaged in it. rule 9 of the discipline and appeal rules,1967 lays down special procedure in certain cases. it begins with ..... and in private capacity, though it may not constitute a misconduct as understood in labour jurisprudence, here that concept of misconduct under industrial employment standing orders act. 1946 or rules and model standing orders framed thereunder will not be relevant and need not be gone into. only question will be whether such an accident ..... noted that the delinquent employee may have been guilty of some technical offence, for instance, violation of the transport rules or the rules under the motor vehicles act, 1988, where no major penalty may be attracted. little later it has also observed that conviction of delinquent employee would be taken as sufficient proof of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2012 (HC)

Vinod @ Arvind Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... , when no intercourse was found done by the appellant, it would be clear that he was not intended to do the intercourse with the prosecutrix and therefore, his overt act does not fall within the purview of attempt to commit rape.14. hukumchandra (dw-1) sarpanch of village kushner has 9 criminal appeal no.530/2001 admitted that some persons ..... punishable under section 376(1) of ipc, but convicted him for the offences punishable under sections 376(1)/511 of ipc and section 3(1)(xi) of the special act but sentence was passed for the offence punishable under section 376(1)/511 of ipc only. no separate sentence was passed for the offence punishable under section 3(1)(xi ..... was filed before the j.m.f.c. jabalpur, who committed the case to the sessions court, jabalpur and ultimately it was transferred to the special judge under the special act for the disposal.3. the appellant abjured his guilt. he did not take any specific plea in the matter, but he has stated that he was innocent. in defence, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2014 (HC)

Mohd. Umar and anr. Vs. Mohd. Islam and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... 13.08.1993 in favour of the petitioners, the petitioners have become the title holder of the tenanted premises to file the petition u/s 14(1)(e) of drc act. it has been held by the hon ble high court of delhi in rajender kumar sharma & ors. vs. leela wati & ors., 155 (2008) dlt383that in a rent petition ..... decreed the eviction petition for bonafide necessity under section 14(1)(e) of the act with respect to the tenanted premises comprising of one room dalan on the ground floor along with a tin shed and one tin shed in the first floor of property ..... reporter or not?. valmiki j.mehta, j (oral) 1. this rent control revision petition is filed under section 25b(8) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) impugning the judgment dated 05.9.2012 by which the additional rent controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2017 (HC)

State vs.sunil

Court : Delhi

..... bureau of investigation held that in case where minimum sentence is prescribed by the statute, the convict cannot be granted the relief under the probation of offenders act. the impugned order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015 is thus liable to be set aside. considering the mitigating factors noted by the learned additional sessions judge ..... a period of one year.2. aggrieved by the order dated 7th march, 2015 releasing sunil on probation for offence punishable under section 8 of the pocso act which provides for a mandatory minimum sentence of three years imprisonment, the state preferred crl.a. 1232/2015. in the said appeal despite issuance of repeated notices ..... ms. justice mukta gupta nishu, ps aman vihar.1. sunil was convicted for offence punishable under section 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act (in short pocso act ) vide judgment dated 25th february, 2015 and vide order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015, sunil was released by giving benefit of probation on his .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2017 (HC)

Sunil vs.state (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... bureau of investigation held that in case where minimum sentence is prescribed by the statute, the convict cannot be granted the relief under the probation of offenders act. the impugned order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015 is thus liable to be set aside. considering the mitigating factors noted by the learned additional sessions judge ..... a period of one year.2. aggrieved by the order dated 7th march, 2015 releasing sunil on probation for offence punishable under section 8 of the pocso act which provides for a mandatory minimum sentence of three years imprisonment, the state preferred crl.a. 1232/2015. in the said appeal despite issuance of repeated notices ..... ms. justice mukta gupta nishu, ps aman vihar.1. sunil was convicted for offence punishable under section 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act (in short pocso act ) vide judgment dated 25th february, 2015 and vide order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015, sunil was released by giving benefit of probation on his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2020 (HC)

National Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Smt Pramila K Valuskar

Court : Karnataka

..... surendra nath loomba and others reported in (2013) 1 acj321 wherein it is held that the insurance company is liable under comprehensive/package policy but not under the act policy and case is remitted back to the tribunal to enable the insurance company to produce the policy, parties to file documents and lead evidence and to decide the ..... particularly when it is used for hire or reward. the insured has deliberately withheld the express conditions of the policy of insurance and provisions of the motor vehicles act. under these circumstances, there exists no liability on the part of the insurer to indemnify the risk of the occupants. the tribunal was required to have noticed ..... sri mahesh kiran shetty, advocate for r-1, notice to r-2 is held sufficient vide order dated1507.2014) this m.f.a is filed under section1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated1611.2009 passed in mvc.no.290/2004 on the file of presiding officer, fast track court, mact, kundapura, awarding a compensation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2020 (HC)

National Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Imran Khan S/o Dawood Khan

Court : Karnataka

..... surendra nath loomba and others reported in (2013) 1 acj321 wherein it is held that the insurance company is liable under comprehensive/package policy but not under the act policy and case is remitted back to the tribunal to enable the insurance company to produce the policy, parties to file documents and lead evidence and to decide the ..... particularly when it is used for hire or reward. the insured has deliberately withheld the express conditions of the policy of insurance and provisions of the motor vehicles act. under these circumstances, there exists no liability on the part of the insurer to indemnify the risk of the occupants. the tribunal was required to have noticed ..... sri mahesh kiran shetty, advocate for r-1, notice to r-2 is held sufficient vide order dated1507.2014) this m.f.a is filed under section1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated1611.2009 passed in mvc.no.290/2004 on the file of presiding officer, fast track court, mact, kundapura, awarding a compensation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2024 (HC)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Smt Sadhika

Court : Karnataka

..... and employee between first respondent and the deceased and thereby, the petitioners are entitled to claim compensation as dependants under section 22 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923.9. as regards quantum of compensation is concerned, the commissioner considered that the deceased was earning rs.4,000/- per month and he was ..... to drive the vehicle without valid driving licence, thereby, he has violated the terms and conditions of the policy, also the provisions of the motor vehicles act, thereby, the insurance company can avoid its liability. it is further contended that the commissioner has erroneously assumed that the deceased was holding a valid ..... :1717 mfa no.9827 of 2012 the spot. the legal representatives of the deceased have approached the commissioner seeking compensation under section 22 of the workmen compensation act. the claim was opposed by the insurance company. after taking the evidence, the commissioner by the impugned judgment awarded compensation of rs.4,23,580/- with .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2015 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Agarwal Vs. C B I and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... cbi in a state (other than union territory or railway area), consent of the state government is necessary. in other words, before the provisions of the delhi act are invoked to exercise power and jurisdiction by special police establishment in any state, the following conditions must be fulfilled; (i) a notification must be issued by ..... the said establishment only with the consent of the state government concerned.36. having noticed the scope and amplitude of sections 5 and 6 of the special police act, the question for consideration is whether the restriction imposed on the powers of the central government would apply mutatis mutandis to the constitutional courts as well. as ..... government/dopt that has full competence to grant sanction for the entire check period. it has further been argued that consent under section 3 of the dspe act, 1946 has been given by the central government thereby giving cbi full jurisdiction to investigate into the matter.10. i have heard counsel for the parties, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //