Court : Supreme Court of India
..... university were approved by the state government.19. thereafter on 30th may 2017, the state government promulgated an ordinance thereby repealing the 2016 act. the impugned act came to be passed by punjab vidhan sabha, which received the assent of the hon ble governor on 12 4th july 2017 and ..... the complaints received that an institution of national importance was suffering 16 (2004) 1 scc712:2003. insc66742 from mismanagement and maladministration. the central government acted on such findings. circumstances warranting an emergent action satisfied the president of india, resulting in his promulgating ordinances which earlier could not culminate in ..... department of higher education, government of punjab, that they have enacted the statutes of the khalsa university in consonance with the 2010 policy, the 2016 act and university grants commission5 guidelines. 3.7. on 6th april 2017, the superintendent of higher education department, government of punjab, communicated to khalsa university .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... two appeals. it is necessary to observe that, such principles have evolved over the years and crystallized into settled principles of law , these are: i) section 134 of indian evidence act, 1872, enshrines the well-recognized maxim that evidence has to be weighed and not counted. in other words, it is the quality of evidence that matters and not the quantity ..... no.200113 of 2017 para 43 of the judgment it is observed by the allahabad high court that it is settled that, the testimony of single eye witness can be acted upon if otherwise reliable and corroboration required only when his evidence is open to doubt and suspicious. a close relative, who is a natural witness, cannot be recorded as an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... two appeals. it is necessary to observe that, such principles have evolved over the years and crystallized into settled principles of law , these are: i) section 134 of indian evidence act, 1872, enshrines the well-recognized maxim that evidence has to be weighed and not counted. in other words, it is the quality of evidence that matters and not the quantity ..... no.200113 of 2017 para 43 of the judgment it is observed by the allahabad high court that it is settled that, the testimony of single eye witness can be acted upon if otherwise reliable and corroboration required only when his evidence is open to doubt and suspicious. a close relative, who is a natural witness, cannot be recorded as an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 96 of the cpc, which deals with appeals from decrees. parties often raise 47 multiple grounds that are not legally permissible under the arbitration act, leading to unnecessary litigation and inefficiency. this practice contradicts the legislative intent behind arbitration, which aims for finality and efficiency in dispute resolution.47. ..... resolution, has now become an integral part of the indian legal system. the comprehensive statute dealing with arbitrations, that is, the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, is a complete code in itself and is in tune with the international standards set out in model law on international commercial arbitration adopted ..... judge (commercial court) at bengaluru, dismissing each of the said arbitration suits filed by the appellant/contractor, under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. the brief facts of the cases necessary for adjudication, are as under: the appellant / contractor was a successful bidder for 14 projects .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... solicitor general. it was then submitted that the rights of the oci cardholders cannot be claimed beyond the notification issued under section 7b of the citizenship act. he submitted that therefore, the rationale lies in not grouping the oci cardholder with indian citizen for applying 371j reservation. 4.5 learned additional ..... undisputedly stated. the petitioner stayed upto 4th december 2018 in the foreign country- britain. he submitted that by virtue of section 9 of the citizenship act, which contemplate the circumstances leading to termination of citizenship, the petitioner s citizenship of india ceased. it was the next submission that the petitioner as ..... being enjoyed by the petitioners. though the notification was sustained as having been backed by competent sovereign power - 28 - under the statute of citizenship act, it was held that it is sustainable prospectively only. it was ruled that the portion of the notification which provide for suppression of the earlier notifications .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... with the respondents complainants for the units in question.3. the respondents complainants filed the complaints before the `state commission under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the present appellants and respondent no.2 seeking inter alia the declaration that the present appellants and the respondent no.2 were jointly and severally involved ..... by the letter of revocation dated 12-8-2014, coupled with public notice of the same date and hence the appellants could not be held liable for any act done by respondent no.2, who had allegedly entered into agreements with the complainants. he also submitted that the complaints as such are not 6 maintainable under the ..... letter of revocation dated 12-8-2014, submitted that even as per the said letter, the appellants had stated that they could not be liable for the acts of the respondent no.2 henceforth meaning thereby after the said letter, however, the respondent no.2 had entered into the agreement with the complainants i.e .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... court ought not to have impounded the documents, cannot be accepted. the very contention that, without there being any determination about the provisions of the stamp act, which is applicable to the said documents sought to be impounded also cannot be accepted. the trial court while passing the order elaborately discussed the same and ..... lj92 wherein discussion was made in sections 33(1) - 16 - nc:2024. khc-d:11334 wp no.102296 of 2022 and 37(2) of the stamp act. the documents said to be insufficiently stamped not produced in evidence, but produced subsequent to settlement of issues, at the time of filing interlocutory application for temporary injunction ..... considering the question involved in the matter and determining the point for consideration, it is appropriate to extract sections 33, 34 and 37 of the karnataka stamp act, for consideration:33. examination and impounding of instruments.- (1) every person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, and every person .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... s/o late narayana udupa, aged about61years, pilathabettu village, bantwala taluk, post:punjalakatte-574233, d.k. district, (reg. under karnataka co-operative society act, 1959) senior citizen benefit not claimed. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... keshava gowda karmaje, s/o krishnappa gowda, aged about60years, chokkady, sullia taluk, post: kukkujadka-574212, dk district, reg. under karnataka co-op. society act, 1959, (senior citizen benefit not claimed) ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... president ramakrishna rai s/o manjunatha rai, aged about54years, yedamangala , kadaba taluk, post: yedamangala - 574221, d k district, reg. under karnataka co-operative society act. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary, department of parliamentary affairs and legislation, vidhana .....
Tag this Judgment!