Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 4 constitution of the force Court: punjab and haryana Page 13 of about 128 results (0.087 seconds)

Jan 13 2014 (HC)

Gulshan Kumar Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... for which the chargesheet has been filed for offence under sections 467 and 468 ipc. there is no allegation that he had ever trespassed the disputed property or committed any act of cheating, misrepresentation or had made any false statement/declaration. it has also been admitted that immediately after coming to know of the dispute in between the parties the petitioner ..... or is a beneficiary. a fact that the petitioner has signed the indemnity bond, furnished by mohinder pal singh, as witness do not reflect his connivance to do any illegal act or that he has taken part in any conspiracy. the learned state counsel has not pointed out any other incriminating evidence against the petitioner. even otherwise, he within a span .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and An ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... meeting the mandatory requirement of section 202 cr.p.c., though the appellants were outside his territorial jurisdiction. the provisions of section 202 cr.p.c.were amended vide amendment act 2005, making it mandatory to postpone the issue of process where the accused resides in an area beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the magistrate concerned. the same was found necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

Om Parkash Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... only piece of untested evidence and must like any other evidence, satisfy the court that what is stated therein is the unalloyed truth and that it is absolutely safe to act upon it. this court has further reiterated that if after careful scrutiny the court is satisfied that it is true and free from any effort to induce the deceased to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Deepak Sibal Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... - land could be transferred. we have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and find no merit in the present writ petition. the land vests in panchayat in terms of haryana act no.9 of 1992, wherein it has been held that land carved out for common purpose by applying pro rata cut shall be managed by the gram panchayat for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (HC)

Present: Ms. Neena Madan Advocate Vs. Smt. Mohinder Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... been represented through counsel g.s. bawa who had also attested before the criminal court, the tribunal examined the definition of 'owner' under section 2(30) of the motor vehicles act and held that non registration of the vehicle would not render a transfer of ownership void but at the same time found the appellant sanjeev kumar as liable because of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2014 (HC)

Mohinder Thakur Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . in case the said purchaser does not accept such liquidated damages, then the said purchaser shall have right to get the sale effected through court of law under specific relief act, at the cost of the said seller. in case the purchaser backs out from this bargain then his/her earnest money shall stand forfeited in favour of the said seller .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2014 (HC)

iqbal Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of compromise. in iqbal singh and others fir no.144 dated september 16, 2013 under sections 307, 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc read with sections 25 and 27 of arms act, police station ghall khurd, district ferozepur, was registered at the instance of harbans singh alleging that the petitioners have assaulted and fired at the complainant and other respondents injuring respondent ..... (crl.) 1052, petitions are allowed. fir no.fir no.144 dated september 16, 2013 under sections 307, 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc read with sections 25 and 27 of arms act registered at police station ghall khurd, district ferozepur, and ddr no.27 under sections 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc registered at police station ghall khurd district ferozepur and all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2014 (HC)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab Vs. State of Haryana and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. *** surya kant, j. [oral].the petitioner impugns acquisition notifications under sections 4 and 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 in respect of acquisition of their plot measuring 406 square yards where, according to the petitioner, a residential house was constructed. the respondents on the other hand have taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. M.P.S. Chandel Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and ors

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... judge, rohtak, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years for an offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 in case fir no.113 dated 23.04.2009, police station kalanaur. he is presently undergoing sentence in district jail, rohtak. cra-s no.186-sb of 2012 ..... crl. writ petition no.596 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh crl. writ petition no.596 of 2014 date of decision:april 17,2014 bal kishan @ langri ....petitioner versus state of haryana & ors ...respondents -- coram: hon'ble mr.justice harinder singh sidhu present: mr.m.p.s.chandel, advocate for the petitioner. mr ..... .r.n.bhardwaj, aag, haryana for the respondent-state. -- harinder singh sidhu, j.(oral) bal kishan @ langri has filed this writ petition for grant of parole under section 3(1)(b) of the haryana good conduct prisoners (temporary release .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Beant Singh Advocate Vs. Harbans Singh ........ Petitione ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... that said bhajan singh also left behind respondent no.2 as his legal heir being his widow and got sanctioned mutation in his name. now the question arises, whether the act of the petitioner in claiming himself to be the sole heir of the deceased and getting mutation sanctioned in his favour would constitute offence under section 415 ipc punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //