Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 4 constitution of the force Court: punjab and haryana Page 11 of about 128 results (0.079 seconds)

May 04 2013 (HC)

Present:- Mr.P.K. Dutt Advocate Vs. Ut of Chandigarh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... when they were not going to derive any benefit on account of murder of rajesh kumar goel. the petitioner is alleged to have suffered loss of money on account of act of kanav arora and shiv kumar in whose accounts the misappropriated amount belonging to petitioner had been transferred. it is nowhere established even during the cours.of investigation in the ..... under fir no.129 (in murder case) and later on were carried in abovesaid cheating case, relating to one and the same transaction i.e.circumstances and motive for the act of murder of rajesh kumar goel. he claimed that the motive to commit the crime of murder was urge of the accused as well as the persons who hired them .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2012 (HC)

Cwp No. 6729 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Cwp No. 6729 of 2012 (Oandm)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... are held by general public and balance is owned by financial institutions. the board of directors of the company has been constituted in terms of the provisions of the act, applicable for any public limited company. at present, out of nine directors, three have been nominated by psidc, two by lending institutions and four by the share ..... the psidc in the year 1983. however, later on its holding was reduced. the land for the company was acquired in terms of provisions of the land acquisition act, 1894. the voluntary retirement scheme was prepared by the government for employees of public sector undertakings and copy thereof was merely forwarded to the company for its guidance. ..... stretch of imagination the company can be termed as a state or any other authority amenable to writ jurisdiction. the company is duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956 (for short, 'the act'). only 44.26% of its shares are held by psidc, 37.35% are held by general public and some part is owned by the financial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2013 (HC)

Abdul Salam Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... -2- is concerned, his acrs for the last five years were 'good' only. the petitioner challenged the non-promotion by filing original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunal act before the central administrative tribunal, chandigarh bench. this original application has been dismissed vide orders dated 02.09.2010 and questioning the validity of that order, present writ petition under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2013 (HC)

1 the Learned Counsel Has Taken Me Through the Written Vs. M/S Mansaro ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... into transaction of purchase at higher price with sister concern to shift the profit of the taxable unit to the unit enjoying tax exemption u/s 80ib of i.t.act, 1961?. (v) whether itat was correct in law as well as facts and circumstances of the case by accepting the argument of assessee concern ignoring the basic fact that although ..... that although no tax is to be paid by the assessee in his sister concern m/s mansarovar forgings pvt.ltd., ludhiana being exempted u/s 80ib of i.t.act, 1961, yet the sister concern of the instant assessee firm has resorted to methods which lead to evasion of tax as the income from other sources disclosed during the survey .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2013 (HC)

Present:- Mr. Balwinder Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... plot.6. in our considered view, the recourse adopted by the revisional authority is wholly illegal and derogatory to its powers under section 45(8) of the act of 1995. the revisional authority ought to have kept in view that the allotment was in the year 2008 and revision petition was instituted after a period of ..... of punjab, department of housing and urban development, punjab in exercise of powers under section 45(8) of the punjab regional and town planning and development act, 1995 (for brevity the 'act of 1995'), whereby revision petition preferred by respondent no.2 against forfeiture of 10% of the total amount deposited towards allotment price of plot no.2025, ..... , which was dismissed by the appellate authority on 05.08.2010.4. still aggrieved, respondent no.2 preferred a revision petition under section 45(8) of the act of 1995, with the following prayer:- keeping in view the facts, law and the circumstances of the case, it is therefore, respectfully prayed that the present revision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2013 (HC)

Gurkirpal Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Gaurav Chopra Advocate Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and A ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal Advocate for Vs. State of Haryana Through L ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... ?. no -.- k. kannan j. (oral) 1. the order in execution was passed at the stage of attempt of the decree holder to realize the amounts determined under the land acquisition act and when the judgment debtor contended that the payments had been duly made and no further amount was payable for realization. the decree holder had an objection that in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2013 (HC)

Asked Her to Bring Rs.30 000/- from Her Parents. when She Vs. Shabnam ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... allegedly tortured and maltreated by the accused. the prosecutrix nowhere stated that she was ever assaulted, beaten or maltreated by accused salim and seema at jalalabad. even no specific allegation of demand of dowry or specific act of cruelty has been attributed by her to her mother-in-law, sister-in-law and husband of her sister-in-law. ..... only vague allegations regarding demand of dowry and cruelty meted out to her, have been made by her against the accused namely rashidhan alias sadikan, salim and seema. in the complaint ex ..... so no offence under section 498a or 506 of indian penal code is proved to have been committed by any of the accused namely; rashidhan alias sadikan, saleem and seema. 19. the prosecutrix has also nowhere alleged as to which particular dowry article was entrusted to which of the accused persons. mere submission of list of the dowry .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2013 (HC)

Beant Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings devi anita involving such offences. but the criminal .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //