Court : Delhi
..... the only direction issued by the tribunal is that the competent authority should reconsider the matter keeping in view the mandate of section 12 of the probation of offenders act.33. one lasting word. the five young men before us come from humble socio-economic background. the incidents alleged against them have a rural setting. we have ..... non-bailable offences and cognizable versus non-cognizable offences.20. the civil concept of an offence being of a depraving character is to look at : whether the act complained of suffers from the tag of a moral turpitude or not.21. if we look at case law pertaining to summary dismissal or removal from service without ..... . as regards jagjeevan ram, vide order dated march 07, 2012 direction issued is to reconsider the matter keeping in view section 12 of the probation of offenders act 1958 which mandates no adverse consequences of the criminal case to follow if the person concerned on being convicted was let off on probation. as regards narender kumar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the only direction issued by the tribunal is that the competent authority should reconsider the matter keeping in view the mandate of section 12 of the probation of offenders act.33. one lasting word. the five young men before us come from humble socio-economic background. the incidents alleged against them have a rural setting. we have ..... non-bailable offences and cognizable versus non-cognizable offences.20. the civil concept of an offence being of a depraving character is to look at : whether the act complained of suffers from the tag of a moral turpitude or not.21. if we look at case law pertaining to summary dismissal or removal from service without ..... . as regards jagjeevan ram, vide order dated march 07, 2012 direction issued is to reconsider the matter keeping in view section 12 of the probation of offenders act 1958 which mandates no adverse consequences of the criminal case to follow if the person concerned on being convicted was let off on probation. as regards narender kumar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the only direction issued by the tribunal is that the competent authority should reconsider the matter keeping in view the mandate of section 12 of the probation of offenders act.33. one lasting word. the five young men before us come from humble socio-economic background. the incidents alleged against them have a rural setting. we have ..... non-bailable offences and cognizable versus non-cognizable offences.20. the civil concept of an offence being of a depraving character is to look at : whether the act complained of suffers from the tag of a moral turpitude or not.21. if we look at case law pertaining to summary dismissal or removal from service without ..... . as regards jagjeevan ram, vide order dated march 07, 2012 direction issued is to reconsider the matter keeping in view section 12 of the probation of offenders act 1958 which mandates no adverse consequences of the criminal case to follow if the person concerned on being convicted was let off on probation. as regards narender kumar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... that blacklisting is not contractual matter.9. the respondents raised the following objections with regard to maintainability of the petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996: (i) the court is not having the territorial jurisdiction. (ii) there is no arbitration agreement with respect to award of future contracts between the ..... parties. thus, this petition filed under section 9 of the act with regard to banning of future dealings is not an arbitral dispute. (iii) the arbitration agreement in previous contract dated 27th september, 2006 invoked by the ..... arbitrator. nevertheless ndmc issued a show-cause and passed an order debarring petitioner for five years. court held relying on iocl judgment above, that ndmc acted in haste in issuing the blacklisting order when arbitration was pending on the same allegations. it held that it was necessary for ndmc to await conclusion .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... to prove that there existed relationship of landlord-tenant between the respondent and kishore lal, thus, suit was not barred under section 50 of delhi rent control act. however, suit has been dismissed only on account of finding returned by the trial court on issue no.3.9. trial court has held that respondent was ..... of rs.400/- . respondent was also paying rs.100/- towards electricity and water charges. thus, the suit was barred under section 50 of delhi rent control act, 1958. respondent was depositing rs.500/- per month with kishore lal right from 1998 onwards and when he asked kishore lal to refund the said amount so ..... and permanent injunction filed by the appellant against respondentdefendant has been dismissed.2. appellant alleged in the plaint that it was a charitable society registered under the societies registration act, 1860 having its registered office at 313/1, inderlok, delhi. appellant was exclusive owner of property bearing no. 5354, first floor, ward no. xv, ladoo ghatti .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... -396 (registered as criminal case no.1111/2007) filed by respondent no.3 prosecuting the petitioner under section 33 read with section 51 of the standards of weights & measures act, 1976 (the act of 1976).2. on 15.06.2006, respondent no.3 (inspector, weights & measures) inspected the premises of m/s. mangal sain & sons, 321/1 main subzi mandi, delhi ..... the compounding notice dated 15.12.2006 was issued to the petitioner and others stating that the petitioner had committed breach of section 33 punishable under section 51 of the act of 1976 presumably on the ground that the net contents of the package were 910 gms which was not standard packaging weight.4. a reply dated 22.12.2006 ..... of the pc rules. in view of the above, it is clear that the company is in breach of section 33 of the standards of weights and measures(enforcement) act, 1985 and hence, we request the department to withdraw the said notice.5. it is alleged that the respondent no.2 changed the stand and instead alleged violation of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... in my view that would not make any difference since already there was a settlement agreement dated 16th may,2011 between the petitioner and sushila suryawanshi which was accepted and acted upon madan lal suryawanshi also and not only that accused husband and wife have received twelve lacs of rupees also and which money they did not refund despite order of ..... nos.1 to 11, 13 to 15 and their associates on 6.5.2010 and also to the president of india/commissioner of police/l.g. delhi and ministry of bal kalyan mantri, smt. krislma teerath. who is neighbour and also of the cast of the complainant, against which no action has been taken so far. the complainant has received ..... that settlement.14. it was rightly submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that for the arrest of sushila suryawanshi he could not be held responsible as that was the act of the police. the petitioner could be expected to give only no objection for grant of bail to her and her husband which he was always ready to do even .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... in my view that would not make any difference since already there was a settlement agreement dated 16th may,2011 between the petitioner and sushila suryawanshi which was accepted and acted upon madan lal suryawanshi also and not only that accused husband and wife have received twelve lacs of rupees also and which money they did not refund despite order of ..... nos.1 to 11, 13 to 15 and their associates on 6.5.2010 and also to the president of india/commissioner of police/l.g. delhi and ministry of bal kalyan mantri, smt. krislma teerath. who is neighbour and also of the cast of the complainant, against which no action has been taken so far. the complainant has received ..... that settlement.14. it was rightly submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that for the arrest of sushila suryawanshi he could not be held responsible as that was the act of the police. the petitioner could be expected to give only no objection for grant of bail to her and her husband which he was always ready to do even .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... not be correct to say that the agreement does not fall within the scope of international commercial arbitration as defined in section 2(1)(f) of the 1996 act. the identity and location of the petitioner being a foreign country would bring the case within the purview of international commercial arbitration.6. in view of the ..... immense difficulties in proceeding before an arbitral tribunal at amsterdam in netherlands; but this court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 11(6) of the 1996 act cannot supplant the agreement of the parties. the parties entered into the arbitration agreement with their eyes wide open. they knew the terms thereof. this court in ..... mr. justice manmohan singh manmohan singh, j.(oral) 1. the present petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.2. the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a building contractor. the respondent invited the tender for the work .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 149(2008)dlt185, wherein the petitioner had filed a petition under section 482 cr.p.c for quashing of a complaint under section 138 of negotiable instruments act, 1881,alleging that the complainant wilfully suppressed certain material facts in the complaint and hence the petition deserves to be dismissed. this court held that the ..... the respondent is otherwise not maintainable in the eyes of law as the same does not fulfil the other essential ingredients of section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881. counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance on the judgment of the apex court inpepsi foods ltd. and anr. vs. special judicial magistrate ..... with a view to black mail the petitioner and extract money from him, the respondent has filed a complaint case under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 after misusing the unused signed cheques of the petitioner. counsel also submits that the complaint case filed by the respondent is manifestly attended with malafide designs .....
Tag this Judgment!