Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 142 pardon and remission Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 30 of about 387 results (0.427 seconds)

The Coca-cola Company Vs. Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT59; 2009(41)PTC460(Del)

..... since the trademark law is not extra territorial, use of a particular trademark abroad would not amount to 'use' within the meaning of the indian trade and merchandise marks act..undoubtedly, once a status quo order in regard to 'use' of the trademark 'kangaro' was in operation, such 'use' would be permissible in relation to the ..... in the name of the respondents in uae and they were thus the registered proprietors thereof. mr. tripathi referring to section 55 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 argued that the application in india of trademark to goods to be exported constituted the 'use' of trademark. in support of his contention mr. tripathi relied ..... the local commissioners alongwith documents filed clearly establish that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit for infringement of trademark under section 134(2) of the trademark act, 1999 and section 20(c) of the code of civil procedure, 1908. he has also argued that the notice sent by the defendant no. 1 itself .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Saden Vikas India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2010]320ITR538(Delhi)

..... addition.7. we are of the view that the tribunal has arrived at the correct conclusion and has correctly appreciated the provisions of section 41(1) of the said act. no error can be discerned from either the order of the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) or that of the income-tax appellate tribunal. in any event, no ..... liability which had gone to the computation of income for earlier years. therefore, writing off the said amount would not attract provisions of section 41(1) of the said act. after referring to several decisions of the supreme court and other high courts, the tribunal concluded as under:10. from the judicial pronouncements discussed above it is clear ..... however, did not agree with the explanation given by the assessee and made the addition of rs. 50 lakhs, invoking the provisions of section 41(1) of the said act. the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) decided in favour of the assessee and deleted the addition. it was held that as no income ever accrued nor any benefit was .....

Deepak Khosla Vs. Vibhu Bakhru and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the company and also providing opportunity to the petitioner to inspect the said records. the respondents filed an application under section 8 of the arbitration & conciliation act seeking for referring the parties to arbitration on the ground that the entire dispute has arisen out of an agreement between the parties. arguments on this application ..... advocate with mr. sanjiv k. tiwari for respondent no. 2arb. pet. no. 93 of 2008this is a petition under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitral tribunal. the arbitration clause is contained in an agreement which has been entered into between the petitions and the respondents. the ..... to the nominee of the other party. as per the arbitration clause itself, the said two arbitrators are required to appoint the third arbitrator, who shall act as the president of the arbitral tribunal.in these circumstances, it is directed that justice r. c. chopra and justice usha mehra shall be the two arbitrators .....

National Textile Corporation (Dpandr) Ltd. Vs Punjab National Bank and ...

Court : Delhi

..... tenants whose arrangements ended almost two decades ago. the guidelines cannot be fetter on statutory powers conferred under the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act. in uttam prakash bansal v. life insurance corporation of india 100 (2002) dlt 97 this court has held that a tenancy terminated earlier to issuance ..... 1992 and the subsequent clarifications issued, leading upto 2002 guidelines. in particular, reliance was placed on the following portion of theguidelines: "resorting to pp act to vacate authorized tenants merely to secure possession of the premises to accommodate the psu's employees, or for commercial redevelopment or to open a branch ..... from public premises under the control of public sector undertakings/financial institutions should not be evicted while resorting to the provisions of the public premises act. counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner is a sick company and therefore cannot be burdened to pay the arrears of the damages .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Madhu and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... borrowing it from the real owner, who meets with an accident without involving any other vehicle, would be entitled to compensation under section 163a of the motor vehicles act or any other provision of law, and also whether the insurer who issued the insurance policy would be legally bound to indemnify the deceased or his legal representatives. ..... 1994 amendment on section 147, the supreme court observed that inspite of the amendment of 1994, the effect of the provisions contained in section 147 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, with respect to persons other mac app. no.155/2005 page 9 of 15 than the owner of the goods or his authorized representatives remains the same. ..... the accident was caused because of the contributory negligence of the drivers of both the buses, the corporation could not be held liable under the provision of motor vehicles act. it was not a claim based on "no fault liability". it was a claim petition filed by the claimant against the owner and insurer of the private bus .....

Sunil Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... case (supra) it was observed as under:-"23. in the celebrated decision reported as air 1947 pc 67 pulukuri kottarya & ors. v. emperor (para 10) section 27 of the evidence act is wholly applicable when a person in police custody produces from some place of concealment some object, such as a dead body. in the decision reported as 1989 cri lj ..... that the deceased and the appellant were last seen together in the company of each other at 10 pm on 12.10.1997, a fact proved through the testimony of bal kishan pw-4 and that nobody saw young mukesh thereafter. the second incriminating circumstance held to be established is, the dead body of mukesh being recovered pursuant to the disclosure ..... to be given the benefit of doubt qua the incriminating weightage of said circumstance.20. qua the evidence of last seen, it is true that the testimony of pw-4 bal kishan, which has not been shaken, does establish that the appellant was in the company of mukesh at around 10:00 pm on 12.10.1997 and the place was .....

Golden Tobacco Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Delhi

..... golden tobacco company, formerly known as gtc industries limited, have filed the present appeals ceac nos. 5/2010 and 14/2010 under section 35g of the central excise and salt act, 1944 (act, for short). ceac no. 5/2010 is directed against the order dated 15th february, 2010 passed by the customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal (tribunal, for short), ..... of the supreme court in metal box india ltd. vs. cce (2003) 11 scc 197 and it was held that section 22 of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 (sica, for short) does not by itself or ex facie entitle a "sick company" to claim waiver of pre-deposit in the appellate proceedings on the ground of ..... union of india vs. adani exports limited, 2007 (218) elt 164 (sc), the supreme court examined a similar provision of pre-deposit in section 129e of the customs act, 1962. it was held that prima facie case is one of the aspects which has to be taken into consideration to decide whether or not to grant full or partial .....

Hemant Baburao Patil Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... certain allegations have been established by commission of enquiry appointed by the government of maharashtra vide notification dated 1st september, 2003 in exercise of power under the commissions of enquiry act, 1952. be it noted, justice p.b. sawant, a retired judge of the supreme court of india, appointed as the one man commission to enquire into the allegations and mal .....

Radha Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... was cautioned in that case not to cause harassment to the doctors in furtherance to a private complaint unless some prima facie evidence of rash and negligent act on the part of the accused doctor was brought on record before the investigating officer. the principle enunciated in both these judgments, particularly in the case ..... disclosing the cognizable offence. while in other cases, there was an overzeal on the part of the police and while even conducting the pre- registration inquiry they acted unfairly. still, a third class of cases is where despite an offence having been made out the investigating agency or the police officer in charge, neither entered ..... information' preferred to an officer incharge of a police station should be reduced into writing which provision was subsequently modified by section 112 of the code of 1872 (act x of 1872) which thereafter read that 'every complaint' preferred to an officer incharge of a police station shall be reduced in writing. the word 'complaint .....

Dr. Anita Babbar Vs. Sh. O.P. Babbar and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... certain amount of flexibility is envisaged. while an impermissible deviation from the original may entail the dismissal of an election petition under section 86(1) of the act, an insignificant variation in the true copy cannot be construed as a fatal defect. it is, however, neither desirable nor possible to catalogue the defects ..... high court overruled a preliminary objection taken by the elected candidate that the election petition should be dismissed straightaway under the provisions of section 86 of the act, holding that the mistakes were of a superficial and insignificant nature, bordering on clerical or typing mistakes, and on the whole there was a substantial compliance ..... the election petition, the election petition was liable to be dismissed in limine under section 86 (1) for non-compliance with section 81 (3) of the act. significantly, in this case, the video cassette was used in the constituency at the instigation of the first respondent and it contained the speeches of the .....