Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 139 communication of certain orders officers Page 93 of about 2,805 results (0.226 seconds)

Dina Bawri Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... ble supreme court was dealing with the case of assassination of rajiv gandhi, the former prime minister of india. the case was under terrorist and disruptive activities act. the special judge after convicting several accused and after giving death sentence submitted the records to the apex court for confirmation of the death sentence. the ..... tried, convicted and sentenced to death or imprisonment for life for murder, nor dealt with according to the same criminal procedure as an adult. the special acts provide for a reformatory procedure for such juvenile offenders or children.206. according to some indian decisions, the post-murder remorse penitence or repentance by the ..... person who patently amenable to reform? well may one exclaim with prof. vrij : "what audacity is involved in these three tasks : too interpret life explain an act, predict the latest inclination of a human mind".28. 'special reasons' we may therefore, say are reasons which are special with reference to the offender, with .....

H. Chandrakanth and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1785; 2002(4)KarLJ152

..... more sensitive while dealing with charges of sexual assault on women. in bharwada bhoginbhai hirjihhai v. state of gujarat, : 1983crilj1096 this court observed that refusal to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault in the absence of corroboration as a rule, is adding insult to injury. this court deprecated viewing evidence ..... an impression on our minds that she is a reliable and truthful witness. her testimony suffers from no infirmity or blemish whatsoever. we have no hesitation in acting upon her testimony alone without looking for any 'corroboration'. however, in this case there is ample corroboration available on the record to lend further credence to ..... in such cases is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the courts should find no difficulty to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable. seeking .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prem Heavy Engineering Works P. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]285ITR554(All)

1. the income-tax appellate tribunal, new delhi, has referred the following question of law under section 256(2) of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') for opinion to this court:whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the hon'ble income-tax appellate tribunal was justified in confirming the deletion of .....

Mohd. Shakir Ali and ors. Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : I(2006)ACC709

..... court cannot read anything into a statutory provision which is plain and unambiguous. his contention was that there is a provision in the second schedule of the motor vehicles act for reducing the amount of compensation by 1/3rd in consideration of the expenses which the victim had incurred towards maintaining himself, had he been alive, and so ..... specifically affirmed in two decisions of the supreme court. it would not be reasonable to say that even though qamaruddin's case does not notice u.p. amendment act and the earlier decision of supreme court approving the full bench decision of this court, it must be deemed to have dissented or departed from earlier decisions or that ..... the extent, it holds that revision against an appellate or revisional order passed by the district court is maintainable under section 115, c.p.c. (as amended by up act 31/78) to the high court does not state the law accurately or overrule the decision of the full bench of this court in jupiter chit fund (pvt.) ltd .....

Commandant 11th Battalion and ors. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT70(CG)

..... 33rd battalion. 4. the present petitioners in their capacity as the respondents submitted before the tribunal that in accordance with rule 37 of m.p. vishesh sashastra bal niyam, 1973 if the recruit does not acquire the required proficiency within nine months or the extended period, then the authority is entitled to remove him ..... in accordance with the powers conferred upon the state government under section 27, sub-sections (1) and (2) of the act, the state government had made rules known as 'the madhya pradesh vishesh sashastra bal niyam, 1973'. chapter iv of the rules refers to recruitment. chapter vii of the rules refers to training. for the purpose ..... discretion of the commandant to discharge or retain the recruit in service. 8. the madhya pradesh vishesh sashastra bal adhiniyam, 1968 (no. 29 of 1968) received the assent of the governor on the 25th november, 1968. this act provides for the constitution and regulation of the special armed force in the state of madhya pradesh. section .....

Shyamlal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4743

..... criminal track record and nefarious activities.23. therefore, we are of the considered opinion that looking to the entirety of the circumstances and facts of the case, the act of the accused/appellant does not come within the category of the rarest of the rare cases, as such the extreme penalty of death imposed on the accused/ ..... criminal it was imperative that he should be punished with extreme penalty. of course, at the time of consideration for punishment the court is required to consider the act as well as right of victim of crime and the society at large. manifestly, inadequate punishment having regard to the nature of crime of offence would not subserve ..... category of special reasons of rarest of rare case and the statutory requirements of section 354(3) of the cr.p.c. are not satisfied. of course, the act of accused was brutal, every incidence of murder involves brutality. brutality is one of the factor for imposing the extreme penalty on the accused while considering the case for .....

Mazdoor Sangh (intuc) and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT16

..... amount of rs. 705.28 lacs an amount of rs. 17.5 lacs is the outstanding towards gratuity which carries interest under section 7(3a) under the provisions of gratuity act, 1972 for which a reliance has been placed on 2003 scc (l & s) 257 (h. ganga hanume gowda v. karnatak agro industries corporation ltd.). it was further submitted that the ..... .28 lacs to the petitioner. out of which rs. 17.5 lacs which is the amount of gratuity shall carry interest as per section 7(3a) of payment of gratuity act, 1972.(2) an amount of rs. 148 lacs being arrears of the salary of the employees for the period from january, 1999 to 15th of september, 1999 will be paid .....

Uttaranchal Sikh Federation and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : I(2006)ACC306; AIR2006Utr67

..... of the hon'ble supreme court does not have any such effect or implication. the supreme court has not held that, notwithstanding the commencement of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the motor vehicles (protective headgears) rules, 1980 are in force and operative. such a question was not considered or decided by the hon'ble supreme ..... , the learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the motor vehicles (protective headgears) rules, 1980 are still operative even after the commencement of the motor vehicles act, 1988. the reasoning of the learned counsel is that unless the hon'ble supreme court was of the view that the said rules are still in force ..... grievance of the petitioners is only regarding the direction contained in paragraph 2(5) of annexure 2 letter which stated that, under section 129 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 every person driving or riding on two-wheelers should wear a protective headgear (helmet). the petitioners want the sikh women to be exempted from wearing protective .....

State of Jharkhand Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR246(Jhr)]

..... . learned counsel submitted that the instant cases arise out of mining leases, governed by the stipulated terms and conditions as well as by the provisions of the mmdr act and mc rules 1960. several issues of law have been raised in the writ petitions, which can be adjudicated upon and decided by this court and not by ..... filed by the state of jharkhand assailing the order dated 9th november, 2005 passed by the mir ing tribunal while exercising the power under section 30 of the mmdr act read with rule 54 of the mc rules 1960.(ii) the mining tribunal while passing the aforesaid order did not approve the order dated 15th december, 2004 whereby ..... detrimental to the public interest as it also entails avoidable wastage of public money and time. various departments of the government are it limbs and, therefore, they must act in coordination and not in confrontation. filing of a writ petition by one department against the other by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the high court is not only .....

Raman Rao P.V. and ors. Vs. J.K. Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 85(1998)CLT280; (1998)ILLJ1084Ori

..... agent for extraction of bamboos of all species from government forests and trade thereof was expedient to be appointed and, accordingly, in exercise of powers under the said act read with sub-rule (7) of rule 3 of the orissa forest produce (control of trade) rules, 1983, the state government appointed the orissa forest ..... a representation to the vice- president (forest), straw products ltd., rayagada against their illegal retrenchment alleging non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947. a copy of the said representation was also sent to the district labour officer, rayagada with a prayer to intervene in the matter. the district ..... service, the state government issued a notification on september 21, 1988 under sub-section (3) of section 1 of the orissa forest produce (control of trade) act, 1981 in pursuance of which the trade of bamboo was nationalised with effect from october 1, 1988. the orissa forest corporation limited was entrusted with the work .....