Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 139 communication of certain orders officers Court: central administrative tribunal principal bench new delhi Page 1 of about 5 results (0.442 seconds)

Apr 04 2014 (TRI)

Sujan Singh, Bangalore Vs. Government of India Ministry of Home Affair ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... . it is not in dispute that the applicant belongs to combatized cadre of sashastra seema bal and, therefore, governed by the provisions of sashastra seema bal act, 2007 (in short, ssb act, 2007) and rules, 2009 framed under the aforesaid act. section 3 of the ssb act, 2007 provides that officers and subordinate officers and under officers and other persons ..... enrolled under the act shall be subject to the provisions of this act and the rules. rule 8 ..... that the assistant commandant is at serial no.(viii) of the list of officers. section 4 of ssb act, 2007 provides that there shall be an armed force of the union called the sashastra seema bal for ensuring the security of the borders of india and performing such other duties as may be entrusted to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2013 (TRI)

Atma Prakash Dixit Sfa (M), Office of the Inspector General and Others ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2013 (TRI)

Sauranshu Sinha and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... when the right of the applicants had already accrued. shri gupta emphatically claimed that the applicants herein are indeed aggrieved persons in terms of administrative tribunals act, 1985 as about 760 persons have been added over and above the applicants in violation of the statutory recruitment rules. the applicants are eligible in law ..... which has been raised against the maintainability of the applications is that the applicants are not persons aggrieved in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. this section, inter alia, provides that a person aggrieved by any order pertaining to any matter within the jurisdiction of the tribunal may make ..... to be dismissed at the very threshold on the technical preliminary objection of they being not aggrieved persons in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. we, therefore, do not find any substance in the preliminary objection raised by the respondents that these applications are not maintainable for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2014 (TRI)

Patanjali Sharma, Dehradun and Others Vs. the Union of India, Through ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... devi (3) and others (2006) 4 scc 1, in which in para-43 the constitution bench of the honble apex court has held that the high courts acting under article 226 of the constitution of india, should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption, regularization, or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms ..... specifically relied upon the observation of the honble apex court in para-11 of this judgment to submit that the public service commission, being a constitutional body, must act in accordance with law, and cannot issue an order or notification extending the term of a dead list, for which it has no authority. it was further ..... been submitted by the private respondent no.r-4 personally to the office of csd. d). that the kpt is an autonomous body constituted under the major port trust act, 1963, functioning under the control of the ministry of surface transport, govt. of india. e). that as per the certificate produced by the private respondent no.r- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2014 (TRI)

Mahatma Mahto, New Delhi Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) Throug ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... of the division bench of the bombay high court in subhash ganpatrao kabade case', that mahadeo koli was recognised for the first time in 1976 under amendment act, 1976, as scheduled tribe is not relatable to reality and an erroneous assumption made without any attempt to investigate the truth in that behalf. presidential declaration ..... tribes order, 1950, it was reiterated. a slight modification was made in that behalf by the presidential notification dated 29-10-1956. in the 1976 amendment act, there is no substantial change except removing the area restriction. thus mahadeo koli, a scheduled tribe continued to be a scheduled tribe even after independence. the ..... hindu koli. prior to 1950, there was no necessity to describe sub-caste. for the first time in 1976 under the scheduled castes scheduled tribes (amendment) act, 1976, mahadeo koli was introduced as a scheduled tribe in the state of maharashtra. the certificates issued to the maternal uncle balakrishna naik as mahadeo koli .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (TRI)

Prem Singh and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner o ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it is thus not as if ..... his wife smt.rampati was also sitting with him. suddenly you along with narayan, bharal lal s.o ram nath, jella ram s/o sunder lal all resident of bal ki dhani, mundiyawas, the. thana gazi distt. alwar (raj.) having lathies in their hands came to his house and pappu ram, ramesh, narayan, bharat lal, jella ..... moral turpitude, disentitling the convict to public employment; 33. we are a little surprised at the list as it excludes offences such as promoting enmity or doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony i.e. offences punishable under section 153-a ipc. it excludes offences pertaining to mutiny and its abetment i.e. offences under sections .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2014 (TRI)

Dr. K.P. Poonacha, Bangalore Vs. the Union of India, Rep. by Its Secre ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... has also submitted that the particulars mentioned by respondent no.4 in his bio-data relied upon by the applicant s counsel which was obtained under the rti act itself shows that respondent no.4 has complied with all the requirements of the notification. 7. the learned additional solicitor general further submits that as no ..... find that in recommending the candidature of the respondent no.6 for appointment as director general, archaeological survey of india, the search-cum-selection committee has not acted arbitrarily. 14. as far as the plea of applicants regarding second round of short listing done by the sub-committee is concerned, as has been noticed hereinabove ..... the selection committee, inter alia, on the grounds that: (1) the selection committee was not properly constituted inasmuch us dr. k.n.rao who had acted as chairman of the selection committee had neither any degree in sanskrit language nor had any association with the propagation, teaching, training or research in the filed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //