Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 124 limitation of powers of confirming authority Page 23 of about 579 results (0.211 seconds)

T. Krishna Pandian Vs. K.S. Bharath Kumar

Court : Chennai

..... padmavathy and another vs. n.narayanan] wherein this court held that even assuming that the petitioner is entitled to claim benefits of section 53-a of the transfer of property act, the agreement should specifically and expressly state the waiver of rent. (iv) (2005) 8 supreme court cases 252 [sait nagjee purushotham and co. ltd., vs. vimalabai ..... petition nor he led any evidence to show that his need is bonafide. in the absence of such evidence, the rent controller and the first appellate authority acted contrary to law in allowing the petition of the landlord by directing the eviction of the tenants. in such circumstances, the high court was fully justified in ..... the bona fide requirement of the previous landlord who was the plaintiff under section 10(iii)(c) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960 could not survive after the plaintiff had transferred his right, title and interest in the demised premises by executing a registered sale deed dated may 11, .....

Dr D Pavan Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... by rendering service in rural/tribal areas, they can capture -:46. :- better prospects of earning higher professional qualifications and consequently eligibility for promotion, acts as a motivating factor and provides incentive to young in-service doctors to opt for service in rural/tribal areas. therefore, assigning weightage to rural ..... the entrance test was held in terms of regulation 9 of the post graduate medical education regulations, 2000, made under section 20 of the indian medical council act, 1956, by the central government.-.:48. :- under that regulation, a single eligibility cum entrance examination namely, national eligibility cum- entrance test for post ..... . sarat chandra & ors (1990 (2) scc669. in that decision, it was held that the word selection must be understood not only the final act of selecting candidates with preparation of the list for appointment, but the selection process consists of various steps such as inviting applications, scrutiny of applications, rejection .....

Chhaya Devi & Anr vs.rukmini Devi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... plaintiffs, accordingly, it is directed that the ========================================================== page 17 of 18 i.a. 9618/2017 in cs(os) 285/2017 defendants are restrained from acting upon the notice dated 08.08.2017 and the resolutions passed in the consequential meeting dated 26.08.2017, which was permitted to be held by ..... mrs. chhaya devi, the director under proposed removal, with a request to make her representation, if she desires, in accordance with a provisions of the companies act. yours faithfully 1. rukmini devi 2. jyoti kumar arya 3. jyoti, kumar arya huf ========================================================== page 8 of 18 i.a. 9618/2017 in cs(os ..... factory (india) private limited registered office: new area sikahdarpur, pc muzaffarpur bihar-842001 india dear sir/madam, subject: special notice u/s 115 of the companies act, 2013 for removal of mrs. chhaya devi from the office of director. we, rukmini devi (6000 shares), jyoti kumar arya (5850 shares), jyoti kumar arya .....

The Dcit Vs. Tata Investment Corporation Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... from which is earned by way of dividend income and interest income. the dividend income is exempt from tax under the provisions of section 10(33) of it act. as admitted by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings 57.34% of the total income is attributable to dividend income. accordingly, the assessee had in ..... no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this act: provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the assessing officer either to reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing ..... assessee company had received gross dividend of rs. 2679.29 lakhs, which was claimed as exempt under the provisions of section 10(33) of the i.t. act. no part of expenditure had been allocated towards the earning of this income.the assessing officer invoking the provisions of section 14a requisitioned the assessee company to explain .....

Most Shakuntala Mehta Vs. The Steel Authority of India Limited Through ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... in the area meant for garage (for upper floors), there was encroachment by this appellant. hence, provisions of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 is applicable and these facts make the present case different from the facts of the banatwala & company versus l.i.c. of india & another case ..... entertain this letters patent appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) initially notice was given under the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 and the same was adjudicated upon vide order dated 06.10.2006 and the order of eviction was passed by the estate officer; (ii) this ..... ps & po bokaro steel city, district bokaro; 4. the estate officer, bokaro steel city, po & ps bokaro steel city, district-bokaro. ...respondents --- coram :- hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra --- for the appellant : mr. sunil kumar, advocate. for the respondents : m/s indrajit sinha, arpan mishra & amitabh prasad, advocates. .....

Cawas Dhunjishaw Saher Vs. Keikobad C. Batliwala

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR175

..... cawas saher had approached the city civil court, bombay in suit no. 6838 of 1967, respondent keikobad initiated proceedings under section 41 of the presidency small causes court act, 1882 for ejectment of his gratuitous licensee cawas saher. these proceedings were initiated in 1988 being l.e. suit no. 396/454 of 1988. the ejectment application ..... 1988 suit filed by respondent keikobad, the relationship of licensor and licensee having come to an end, an application under section 41 of the presidency small causes courts act, 1882 was not at all maintainable. secondly, it was contended that the mother of the petitioner cawas namely aloo saher was the member of the family of ..... first place, on the averments in the application for ejectment, the 1988 suit filed by respondent keikobad was maintainable under section 41 of the presidency small causes courts act, 1882. secondly, it was contended that, on her marriage, aloo had ceased to be the member of the family of her parents and since she had .....

Hari Lal Vs. Balvantia and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1069

..... deeds were executed during pendency of the suit. such sale deeds are hit by doctrine of lis pendens enshrined in section 52 of the transfer of property act. the defendants-appellant who purchased the property with full knowledge of her right to receive maintenance cannot now be permitted to defeat this important right by purchasing ..... defendants in whose favour the property has been transferred during pendency of the suit. for this purpose, in our opinion, section 39 of the transfer of property act is the appropriate provision under which the plaintiff-respondent could claim maintenance against the transferees. section 39 reads as under :'39. transfer where third person is ..... plaintiff was decreed by judgment and decree dated 27.3.1997, aggrieved by which the present appeal has been filed under section 19 of the family courts act.9. we have heard counsel for the appellant and the respondents. learned counsel for the appellant assailing the impugned judgment of the family court has submitted .....

Pardeep and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR505

..... on their business therein. the state of haryana, without considering the nature of structures, existing on the land, issued a notification, under section 4 of the act, dated 29.11.2001, proposing to acquire land in villages nagal kalan and kundli for the ostensible public purpose, namely, for the development and utilization as ..... , dated 7.3.2003, detailing the constructions, raised by the petitioners. despite this report, the land acquisition collector served a notice, under section 9 of the act, requiring the petitioners to submit their respective claim qua compensation.4. it is argued that as the petitioners have raised constructions, in the shape of houses, a ..... certain caveats, primary among them being that the structures should be in existence on the date of the issuance of the notification under section 4 of the act and the released land should be capable of adjustment, within the proposed planning. a plea for release, duly considered within the parameters of the policy, would .....

Vijayan P.K. and ors. Vs. the Govt. of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ934; 2008(3)KLT941

..... contrary, the learned govt. pleader asserted that the 1st respondent was exercising its power of approval with modification conferred on it under section 100(2) of the act, while modifying ext. p4 and finalising the scheme as per ext. p5 notification.31. on appreciating the rival contentions, i am inclined to agree with the counsel ..... or routes. the said proposal threatens the proprietary right of that individual or individuals. under section 68-d read with rules 8 and 10 made under the act, any person affected by the aforesaid proposed scheme may file objections within the prescribed time before the secretary of the transport department. under the said provisions, the ..... , the state government is bound to consider the objections and thereafter approve and publish the scheme in the manner as provided under section 100(2) of the act. while finalising the draft scheme the state government is entitled to either approve the same as such or approve the draft with modifications. it is stated that .....

A.N. Ramchandra Iyer and ors. Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 131Ind.Cas.481

..... court extends to the determination of questions affecting persons not parties to the insolvency, has been decided in several cases under section 105 of the english bankruptcy act (1914) which corresponds to our section. in some cases the bankruptcy courts even assumed exclusive jurisdiction by the issue of an injunction. these cases are ..... in unsuitable cases. mr. srinivasa iyengar has endeavoured to show by examples the divers uses to which the section, or the corresponding section in the provincial insolvency act, has been put. in rama-somayajulu v. official receiver, godavery : air1926mad360 an issue had to be tried whether a partition had taken place or not. ..... the section must be 'property of the insolvent divisible among his creditors. if the views expressed are not erroneous, i can discover nothing in the provisions of the act to exclude the enquiry upon this score. ramesam, j., in in the matter of balusami ayyar [official assignee of madras v. ramachandra ayyar : air1928mad735 ] .....