Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 124 limitation of powers of confirming authority Court: madhya pradesh

Uniscans and Sonics Ltd. Vs. M.P. Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT555

..... any expense incurred by him in cutting off and reconnecting the supply, are paid, but no longer.(2) where any difference or dispute which by or under this act is required to be determined by an electrical inspector, has been referred to the inspector before notice as aforesaid has been given by the licensee, the licensee shall not ..... which have been considered in the light of the material on record and the provisions of law governing the situation.5. section 2(c) of (the indian) electricity act, 1910 defines a consumer as under:'consumer' means any person who is supplied with energy by a licensee or the government or by any other person engaged in ..... a sum of rs. 9,36,617/- purporting to be towards electricity dues of sister companies.2. petitioner is a limited company duly registered under the provisions of companies act. it obtained electricity connection from respondent no. 1 and an agreement dated 17-1-1987 (annexure p-l) was duly executed between the petitioner and the electricity board. .....

Ramesh Chandra Vs. Shrivati (Smt.) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)MPHT217

..... ) of section 166, even the report submitted to the claims tribunal under sub-section (6) of section 158 can be treated as an application for compensation under the m.v. act. if required, in appropriate cases, the court may permit amendment to the claim petition.18. in claim case no. 84/2005 (m.a. no. 132/06), the claimants ..... in : (2003) 2 scc 274 para 21 it was held as follows (scc p. 281):21. for the reasons discussed above, in our view, under the m.v. act, there is no restriction that the tribunal/court cannot award compensation amount exceeding the claimed amount. the function of the tribunal/court is to award 'just' compensation which is reasonable ..... wrong to say that on 3-9-2004, rameshchand sharma has handed over the form no. 29 (c) to santosh singh kushwah.13. section 50 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 prescribes procedure for transfer of ownership with regard to motor vehicle which is as under:50. transfer of ownership.--(1) where the ownership of any motor vehicle registered .....

Pawan Arora Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... healthy competition amongst the applicants aspiring for stage carriage permits; (vii) the impugned notice and the stipulations as contained therein besides being contrary to the act of 1988 and the judgment of hon'ble apex court in the case of mithilesh garg (supra), even otherwise is totally arbitrary and only to defeat ..... for consideration of applications for grant of permit. the petitioner in the rejoinder-affidavit has specifically stated that the aforesaid handmade procedure has never been acted upon earlier during the meetings scheduled from the years 1997 upto 15/10/2014 as applications submitted on the date of consideration have been duly considered ..... aforesaid submission made in the rejoinder-affidavit has not been controverted by the respondents/state. respondents have not been able to refer to any provisions of act of 1988 or the rules framed thereunder contrary to that. hence, the aforesaid procedure adopted by the respondent/state in the meeting scheduled for consideration .....

Parenteral Drugs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ386

..... of executive/administrative directions, it is his prayer for quashing of such administrative directions and administrative directions cannot be allowed to violate fundamental rights. if an authority acts in an arbitrary manner, its action would be bad in law and liable to be quashed.40. for the foregoing reasons, this petition deserves to be allowed ..... i. v. fluids simply because it could manage to hire such machines on loan licence basis from another tenderer, judged by minimal standards of fairness, does this act of the respondents, though farthest exterior line of fairness, let alone stand its test?13. i. v. fluids for transfusion are generally used in emergencies. they ..... with the public, whether by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or issuing quotas or licences or granting other forms of largess, the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet will and, like a private individual, deal with any person it pleases, but its action must be in conformity with standard or norm .....

Lakhan and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... his pocket which he suddenly brought out and stabbed the deceased. 9. section 34 has been enacted on the principle of joint liability in the commission of a criminal act. the section is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence. the distinctive feature of the section is the element of participation in action. the ..... of section 34 the essence of the liability is to be found in the existence of a common intention animating the accused leading to the commission of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. as a result of the application of principles enunciated in section 34, when an accused is convicted under section 302 read with section 34 ..... some knowledge that the accused lakhan would inflict some injury on the deceased could not be ruled out. such common intention can be formed even during the commission of the act. as such, so far as the accused virendra is concerned, looking to the injury caused, he can be held guilty under section 304 part ii ipc. 20. .....

Vinod @ Arvind Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... , when no intercourse was found done by the appellant, it would be clear that he was not intended to do the intercourse with the prosecutrix and therefore, his overt act does not fall within the purview of attempt to commit rape.14. hukumchandra (dw-1) sarpanch of village kushner has 9 criminal appeal no.530/2001 admitted that some persons ..... punishable under section 376(1) of ipc, but convicted him for the offences punishable under sections 376(1)/511 of ipc and section 3(1)(xi) of the special act but sentence was passed for the offence punishable under section 376(1)/511 of ipc only. no separate sentence was passed for the offence punishable under section 3(1)(xi ..... was filed before the j.m.f.c. jabalpur, who committed the case to the sessions court, jabalpur and ultimately it was transferred to the special judge under the special act for the disposal.3. the appellant abjured his guilt. he did not take any specific plea in the matter, but he has stated that he was innocent. in defence, .....

Mohd. Ismail Khan Vs. Madhya Pradesh Raod Transport Corporation and an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)MPHT348

..... injustice if a literal interpretation is given to the expression 'had not made an application to the collector under section 18' in section 28-a of the act. the aforesaid expression would mean that if the landowner has made an application for reference under section 18 and that reference is entertained and answered. in other words, ..... makes a reference under section 18 but that was dismissed on the ground of delay, he would not get the right of section 28-a of the land acquisition act when some other person makes a reference and the reference is answered. but parliament having enacted section 28-a, as a beneficial provision, it would cause great ..... not there unless on a literal construction being given a part of the statute becomes meaningless. but before any words are read to repair an omission in the act, it should be possible to state with certainty that these words would have been inserted by the draftsman and approved by the legislature had their attention been drawn .....

Badam Singh and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... ) absence of any specific allegation and prima facie case against co-accused proceedings quashed by supreme court itself penal coe, 1860 ss. 498-a, 323, 504 and 506 dowry prohibition act, 1961, ss. 3 and 4. besides the allegations of demand of dowry, it is also alleged in the police statement that on 10.10.2013 along with the other accused .....

Prasant Goyal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband in connection with any demand for dowry as also the presumption under section 113-b indian evidence act are fully established the case of prosecution". 12. in the present case after going through the police statements it cannot be denied that there was no definite evidence of ill ..... for ill treatment for dowry does not seem to be without any basis. at this moment presumption as to abetment of suicide to the deceased under section 113 of evidence act could not be ruled out. besides, at the stage of framing of charge the court is not to hold an elaborate enquiry. only primafacie case is to be seen. in .....

Hemant Bhannarwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... chief judicial magistrate pipariya, district hoshangabad in order to taking cognizance for offence punishable under section 498-a, 304-b/34 of ipc and section 3/4 of dowry prohibition act so far it relates to petitioner hemant bhannarwar, is hereby quashed. copy of this order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. ravi (a.k.sharma) judge ..... pipariya district hoshangabad has taken the cognizance against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections 498-a and 304-b/34 of ipc and section 3/4 of dowry prohibition act. the brief facts of the case are that geeta bai, wife of the petitioner's brother rajesh, was died on 13/11/2011 had committed suicide by hanging herself at .....