Court : Supreme Court of India
..... appeal.2. the appellant herein was serving as a head constable (ministerial) in the 15th battalion of the sashastra seema bal (ssb), bongaigaon. he was charged with violation of good order and discipline under section 43 of the shashastra seema bal act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ssb act ), for having entered the mahila barrack of the battalion at around 00:15 hours, on the intervening ..... rank of constable and forfeiture of two years service for the purpose of promotion. she was also tried by the sfc for an offence under section 43 of the ssb act. it is submitted that therefore the learned single judge rightly interfered with the punishment of removal from service awarded by the disciplinary authority commandant holding that the same was disproportionate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... . ...3/- wp(c).no. 9489 of 2013 (i) -3- 5. director general central industrial security force, block no.13 cgo complex, lodhi road, new delhi-110 003.6. director general sashastra seema bal, block no.12, cgo complex lodhi road, new delhi-110 003.7. director general, assam rifles, laithumkarh post, shillong meghalaya-793011.8. director general indo tibetan border police force, block ..... jain v. state of haryana; state of kerala v. a.lakshmikutty) but that is only one aspect of the matter. the other aspect is the obligation of the government to act fairly. the whole exercise cannot be reduced to a farce. having sent a requisition/request to the commission to select a particular number of candidates for a particular category, - in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioners is that they had appeared in the competitive examination conducted by the staff selection commission (hereinafter referred to as ssc ) for appointment to the post of constable in sashastra seema bal (in short ssb ). they qualified the said examination and joined their services on 09.07.2012 in ssb, 41 bn., ranidanga (west bengal).2. by an impugned order dated 17 ..... these petitioners made two fold submissions to challenge the said order. the first being; that vide order dated 17.05.2013 itself, the inspector general acting under the powers conferred on him under section 132 of ssb act, 2007 read with rule 185 of ssb rules, 2009 annulled the proceedings of summary force court (in short sfc ) on the ground that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... of sos/pss and were posted in the arc wing of dgs. it is the case of the applicants that dgs had four wings viz special service bureau [now sashastra seema bal (ssb)] aviation research centre (arc), special frontier force (sff) and chief inspectorate of armaments (cioa). after ssb and cioa were transferred to the ministry of home ..... quite often the tribunals are without beings conscious of the fact that fixation of pay is not their function. it is the function of the government within normally acts on the recommendations of a pay commission. shri zulfiqar alam cited judgment in another case of similar nature where the apex court held in secretary, finance department ..... state action is challenged, the function of the court is to examine the action in accordance with law and to determine whether the legislature or the executive has acted within the powers and functions assigned under the constitution and if not, the court must strike down the action. while doing so the court must remain within .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioners is that they had appeared in the competitive examination conducted by the staff selection commission (hereinafter referred to as ssc ) for appointment to the post of constable in sashastra seema bal (in short ssb ). they qualified the said examination and joined their services on 09.07.2012 in ssb, 41 bn., ranidanga (west bengal).2. by an impugned order dated 17 ..... these petitioners made two fold submissions to challenge the said order. the first being; that vide order dated 17.05.2013 itself, the inspector general acting under the powers conferred on him under section 132 of ssb act, 2007 read with rule 185 of ssb rules, 2009 annulled the proceedings of summary force court (in short sfc ) on the ground that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioners is that they had appeared in the competitive examination conducted by the staff selection commission (hereinafter referred to as ssc ) for appointment to the post of constable in sashastra seema bal (in short ssb ). they qualified the said examination and joined their services on 09.07.2012 in ssb, 41 bn., ranidanga (west bengal).2. by an impugned order dated 17 ..... these petitioners made two fold submissions to challenge the said order. the first being; that vide order dated 17.05.2013 itself, the inspector general acting under the powers conferred on him under section 132 of ssb act, 2007 read with rule 185 of ssb rules, 2009 annulled the proceedings of summary force court (in short sfc ) on the ground that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . coram: hon'ble mr. justice sanjiv khanna hon'ble mr. justice navin chawla sanjiv khanna, j.(oral): the petitioner-jagvinder singh upon selection was appointed as constable (driver) in the sashastra seema bal (ssb) on 12th august, 2013.2. on 28th june, 2014, show cause notice was issued to the petitioner proposing termination of services for the reason that the petitioner had furnished ..... following principles have been laid down:-"the material 27. suppression of material information presupposes that what is suppressed that matters not every technical or trivial matter. the employer has to act on due consideration of rules/instructions if any in exercise of powers in order to cancel candidature or for terminating the services of employee. though a person who has suppressed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) the petitioner s service career has a chequered history. we need not refer to same in detail, in view of the limited controversy involved.2. the petitioner had retired from sashastra seema bal (ssb for short) as second in command (2ic) on 30th november, 2009. wp(c) 1156/2017 page 1 3. the petitioner on the date of retirement was facing disciplinary proceedings ..... court in wp(c) no.8289/2014, as it was held that the misconduct, as alleged, was based upon the petitioner s misunderstanding of the provisions of the income tax act and the methodology for depositing tax. infliction of the punishment was not justified. the order of penalty was set aside and the respondents were directed to pay to the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 2nd july 2014 whereby his appeal was rejected.2. the background facts are that the... petitioner was recruited in the year 2000 as constable (general duty) (ct/gd) with the sashastra seema bal (ssb). according to the... petitioner, in 2010 he was deployed to work at the official residence of inspector general/ig (administration) shri a.k. negi w.p. (c) 8064/2015 ..... officer at c-13 hudco place, new delhi during the month w.p. (c) 8064/2015 page 2 of 10 of august 2010 and on 04.1.2011 and committed acts of immoral activities, violation of good order and discipline by indulging himself and involving other ssb personnel in illegal sexual activities. after hearing of the accused the case has been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... reduction of his pension by 25% for a period of five years for the alleged act of gross misconduct in the year 1999-2000 in purchase of medicines.2. the factual matrix concerning the writ petition is that the petitioner joined sashastra seema bal (ssb) as a doctor in the year 1974. on attaining the age of superannuation ..... procurement of medicines signed on a false certificate recorded by shri d.gogoi, sfa (medic) on the bill, thereby exhibiting gross negligence and supervision and hence committed misconduct and act most unbecoming of a government servant of his rank and status thereby violating the provision of rule 3 sub rule (1) clause (ii) & (iii) of the ccs ..... quotations from local firms which is contrary to para 28 annexure below rule 102(1) of gfr thereby violating the established laid down procedure and committing misconduct and an act most unbecoming of a government servant of his rank and status, hereby violating the provision of rule 3 sub rule (1) clause (ii) & (iii) of the .....
Tag this Judgment!