Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 117 order for disposal of property regarding which offence is committed Page 9 of about 698 results (0.664 seconds)

P. Lalithamma and Others Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore City Corporat ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same has been registered in crime no.74 of 2003 for the offence punishable under sec.338 and 304 (a) of ipc and under sec.272 and 437 of forest act against the officials of the respondent. in the complaint it is clearly stated that the tree was infected and though representation was given no steps have been taken by the ..... (this writ appeal is filed u/s 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.46526/2003 dated 15/12/2005) 1. this appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners in w. .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Mahinder Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... deceased, the claimants seek enhancement of the same on the ground of wrong deduction while assessing dependency. the claim petition brought under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 [for short the act .].has been allowed by learned tribunal vide the impugned award in a sum of ` 23,15,000/-. surjit singh, who met with fatal accident on 8.1.2010 ..... ) r.c.r.(civil) 42 where it is clearly laid down that the financial assistance is something different from the amount payable under the act and the said amount cannot be deducted from the compensation payable under the act. the deceased has though, been unmarried, his unmarried sister has been dependent upon him who was younger to him in age. if the .....

Bijender @ Naushad Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... him and ultimately he was declared a proclaimed offender on 28.9.2011. this led to filing of a supplementary charge sheet against him under section 174a of the act. pw10 who executed the process issued under section 82 of cr.p.c. stated that he visited the given address of the appellant his father met him and stated ..... the house after house trespass. therefore, the entry in the house of the complainant for the purpose of committing theft amounted to house breaking punishable under section 454 of the act. therefore, no fault can be found with the conviction of the appellant under section 454 of ipc.19. the appellant was released on bail during investigation of the case. ..... in the hands of a person carrying it is visible to the victim of the crime, it does have the intended effect of intimidating the victim and such an act also contain an implicit threat to use the weapon against the victim in case he resists the offender from executing his plan. therefore, carrying a deadly weapon which is .....

Sunheri Devi and Others Vs. Sewa Singh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .2004 acj934that only those claimants having annual income upto `40,000/-, can take benefit of provisions of section 163-a of motor vehicle act, 1988. it also took the view that it is clear from the ddr that deceased himself was to be blamed for the accident. the accident took place due to ..... claimant has claimed that income of the deceased was above `40,000/- p.a.and therefore, the claim petition is not maintainable under section 163-a of motor vehicle act, 1988. the tribunal took the view by placing reliance on a judgment of hon'ble the supreme court in deepal girishbhai soni and others versus united india insurance co.ltd ..... 8.2004 passed by motor accident claims tribunal, patiala (for short `the tribunal') vide which the claim petition of the appellants under section 163-a of the motor vehicle act, 1988 was dismissed with costs. as per the case put up by the claimants before the tribunal, tulsi dutt alongwith balram singh was travelling on 1.1.2001 on .....

Ravi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... fight and in the heat of passion. the fact that the appellant did not use the sharp-edged weapon with which he was armed also shows that he did not act in a cruel or unusual manner nor did he take an undue advantage. it is evident from the deposition of dhanalakshmi, that she did not see the appellant assaulting the ..... child. even as per poonam, ravi was intoxicated at the time of incident. whatever may be the frustrations of life, ravi was still possessed of the knowledge that the reckless act caused by him could cause the death of the little baby.11. the hon ble supreme court in the decision reported as (2011) 7 scc110elavarasan vs. state held: 42. ..... to fall. no weapon of offence has been used. at best the action of ravi even as per the prosecution case who was intoxicated at that time was a reckless act unmindful of its consequences. hence, he be acquitted of the charges framed or in the alternate convicted for a lesser offence and released on the period already undergone. the defence .....

Mr.Prashaanth Balasubramaniam Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... (amendment) ordinance, 2014 (no.3 of 2014) dated 28.5.2014 passed by the 1st respondent substituting section 5(8) of telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 pursuant to which mr.nirpendra misra has been designated as the principal secretary to the honourable prime minister.2. mr.nithyaesh natraj, learned counsel appearing for the ..... the central government for the first time under the impugned ordinance to grant prior approval in a given case. when the promulgation of the ordinance is a legislative act, then exercise of the discretion given to central government can be questioned. if the grievance of the petitioner is that the discretion has been wrongly exercised, ..... .wadhwa vs. state of bihar, (1987 scr (1) 798), the supreme court was dealing with re-promulgation of ordinance by governor without getting them replaced by acts. the facts of the present case are totally different. we do not find any substance in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the .....

Gunasekaran Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Perambalur District

Court : Chennai

..... , we are afraid the evidence of pw-4 and pw-5 is hardly an evidence in law to establish such offence. in that situation section 32(1) of the evidence act does not get attracted. 34. recently, in subhash vs. state of maharashtra [criminal appeal no.93 of 2003 dated 15.6.2016],under similar circumstances, the accused was acquitted ..... disjuncted from the offence under section 306, ipc the question of her death is not an issue for consideration and on that premise also section 32 (1) of the evidence act will stand at bay so far as these materials are concerned. (emphasis supplied by me) 30. in bhairaon singh vs. staste of madhya pradesh [air 2009 sc 2603] in connection ..... (supra), the hon'ble supreme court held as under: 7. unless the statement of a dead person would fall within the purview of section 32(1) of the indian evidence act there is no other provision under which the same can be admitted in evidence. in order to make the statement of a dead person admissible in law (written or verbal .....

Unique InvIn Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)74ITD43(Kol.)

..... date if transacted shares with a third party also. this proves the genuineness of the rate as well as the transactions. it is well settled that strict rules of evidence act are not applicable to it proceedings. in the absence of any corroborative evidence, in the case before us, the ao refused to solely rely upon the self-serving documents in ..... shares and the return filed by that company for the asst.yr. 1990-91 was accepted by the same ao, in an order passed under s.143(3) of the act and this proves the genuineness of the transaction and the department cannot play hot and cold i.e., accepting the transaction as genuine in the case of the seller and ..... doubt on the actual delivery of the shares, if not the very genuineness of the transactions itself.13. it is well settled that under the it act, the ao is not bound by the rigours of evidence act. this share transactions appeared to the ao to be sham and, therefore, be called upon the assessee to corroborate the transactions by producing third .....

Tamil Nadu Minerals Ltd. Vs. the Jt. Commr. of I.T., Spl.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2006)281ITR101(Chennai)

..... meal centres before the chief minister's birthday, besides the hon'ble chief minister had ordered to take up the question of exemption of this expenditure under the income-tax act to those who made the contribution. there is absolutely no business nexus with these expenses. as such, it cannot be allowed under section 37(1).10. the next issue ..... on of the assessee's business or which results any benefits to the assessee's business has to be regarded as an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the act. it is, therefore, important to see that whether the contribution was made towards the welfare fund or directly connected or related with the carrying on of the assessee' ..... minister birth day on 24.2.1992. further, the hon'ble chief minister has ordered to take up the question of exception of this expenditure under the income-tax act in those who made the contribution. i knew very well that you have more anxiety and tamin is leading in this cause than other public sector undertakings. i also .....

Cedan Vinmay (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Ahd.)174

..... as the assessee-company had not done the business of consignment agent for any outside parties. the assessing officer had also pointed out that the assessee could not have acted as an agent without a specific resolution as per provisions of section 149(2a). the assessee furnished a reply which according to the assessing officer was not satisfactory. ..... that the findings of the revenue authorities in this regard may be reversed and the claim of the assessee that it carried on the business of financing, trading and acting as agent, etc. may be accepted. it was also contended that since the assessee has carried on the business during the year under appeal, the expenses incurred for ..... if it is assumed that such a resolution was passed, it cannot be said to be in compliance to the provisions of section 149(2a) of the companies act as no other resolution was passed after the incorporation of the company within the meaning of section 149(2a). therefore, the claim of the assessee that the business .....