Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 115 delivery of lunatic accused to relatives Sorted by: recent Page 8 of about 107 results (0.172 seconds)

Oct 09 2023 (SC)

M/s Kewal Court Pvt Ltd And Anr. Vs. The State Of West Bengal And Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... time of its enactment, when juxtaposed against the regressive impact experienced in different states which is indicated in the statement of objects and reasons of the repeal act, invite an authoritative determination of all the related issues by a larger bench. this case may, therefore, be placed before hon ble the chief justice ..... angoori devi3. however, before the controversy could be authoritatively settled by a five-judge bench, angoori devi3 was rendered infructuous due to repeal of the ceiling act in the state of uttar pradesh. unfortunately, the lead judgement in billimoria5 did not even notice jhonson1 though apparently it was brought to the notice of the ..... person holding vacant land in excess of ceiling limit to file statement whereupon the competent authority would prepare a draft statement under section 8 of the act and after considering any objection received against it, section 9 contemplates a final statement determining the vacant land held by the person concerned. such vacant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2023 (HC)

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... petitioners and allowed the petitions. while doing so, the learned single judge took into account the various statutory provisions contained in the kh act, kuda act, ktcp act and kiad act and came to the concision that none of the statutory provisions can be interpreted, construed or understood as depriving writ petitioners from their ..... the article. the state seeking to acquire private property for public purpose cannot say that no compensation shall be paid. the regional and town planning act also does not contemplate deprivation of a landholder of his land, without compensation. statutory authorities are bound to pay adequate compensation.100. the high courts ..... hanumanth m pai, aged about68years, occ. business, r/o. kiravatti.2. m/s harsham logistics private limited a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, having its registered office38 ii floor, eureka junction, t b road, hubballi58002, dharwad, rep. by sri dinesh s/o ramdas pai, director and authorised signatory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2023 (HC)

Sri Raghavendra Venkatesh Burli Vs. Mr Shekarayya Ningayya Tawargeri

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... sable and others v. assistant charity commissioner and others (2004) 3 scc137has observed that no injunction can be granted against the true owner and section 6 of the specific relief act cannot be invoked to protect the wrongdoer who suppressed the material facts from the courts.-. 22 - nc:2023. khc-d:11954 rsa no.1954 of 2007 c/w rsa no ..... .1955 of 2007 28. the appellant submitted that section 41 of the specific relief act debars any relief to be given to such an erring person as the respondent who is guilty of suppression of material facts.29. the appellant relied on automobile products india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2023 (HC)

Sri Raghavendra Venkatesh Burli Vs. Mr Hanamantha Mulchand Garag

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... sable and others v. assistant charity commissioner and others (2004) 3 scc137has observed that no injunction can be granted against the true owner and section 6 of the specific relief act cannot be invoked to protect the wrongdoer who suppressed the material facts from the courts.-. 22 - nc:2023. khc-d:11954 rsa no.1954 of 2007 c/w rsa no ..... .1955 of 2007 28. the appellant submitted that section 41 of the specific relief act debars any relief to be given to such an erring person as the respondent who is guilty of suppression of material facts.29. the appellant relied on automobile products india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2023 (HC)

Sri Somashekar Nyamagouda Vs. State Of Karnataka By The

Court : Karnataka

..... of the word sanction is as under: 26 webster's third new internal dictionary : explicit permission or recognition by one in authority that gives validity to the act of another person or body; something that authorizes, confirms, or countenances. the new lexicon webster's dictionary : explicit permission given by someone in authority. the ..... commission of crime. 2039. during further investigation, shri. somashekhar nyamagouda (a-21) denied to undergo polygraph test before the hon'ble court.40. the above overt acts and circumstances manifestly disclose the commission of offences by shri. vikas kalburgi (a-18), shri chenakeshva tingerikar a-19, shri. vasudev rama nilkeni (a-20) ..... the petitioner is preparation of fake travel itinerary, raising of bills and making certain calls to other accused. these are illegal and illicit acts of the petitioner. these acts cannot be brought within the ambit of discharge of official duty to require sanction or otherwise. it is the submission of the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2023 (HC)

The State Vs. Dr Renuka Prasad

Court : Karnataka

..... from this witness that on 11.04.2011, accused no.3 asked him to bring a number plate of the motorcycle written in kannada and then he visited seema arts and got written the number plate containing the registration no.ka-21-j-3141, and paid rs.100/- to the artist.32. pw50 was examined to ..... the seized incriminating materials and in this regard we have already made elaborate discussion. the recoveries thus made falls within the ambit of section 27 of the indian evidence act. that apart, with regard to two circumstances, namely, motive and conspiracy, the confession statement of each accused can be used against other. examined whether the ingredients ..... was to prove, in order to further strengthen the independent evidence thus available in respect of each circumstance, we may refer to section 30 of the indian evidence act. this section reads as below: 30. consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and others jointly under trial for same offence.- when more persons than one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2023 (HC)

Whitefield Rising Trust Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .justice m.g.s.kamal writ petition no.11265 of2023(lb-bmp-pil) between: whitefield rising trust a charitable trust registered under section12aa(1)(b)(i) of the income tax act, 1961. having its registered address at: no.7, sigma soft tech park, 5th floor, beta block, whitefield main road, varthur kodi bengaluru-560 066 represented by its trustee mr. ajit ..... that the subject land is a tank, falling within the classification of 'b' kharab land reserved for public purpose. thus, she submits that under the provisions of karnataka land revenue act and rules 'b' kharab land which is 6 reserved for public purpose cannot be made a subject matter of a grant. (e) referring to a communication dated 21.05.2011 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2023 (HC)

Mspl Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... pune municipal corp. v. promoters and a builders assn. this court held that the development control rules framed under the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 had statutory force. on the other hand the circulars issued by the municipal commissioner were simply executive instructions. the circulars, therefore, could not ..... e-auction conducted by the state government and that the government of india had transferred all statutory permissions including permissions under section 2 of fc act on the recommendation made by the state government. in furtherance to the said contention the petitioners therein had produced proceedings of the government of karnataka ..... to government, forest, ecology and environment department, karnataka government secretariat, bengaluru evidencing the fact of central government according approval under section 2 of fc act, 1980 for diversion of forest land for the purpose of mining in favour of sri.srinivasulu. he also referred to a communication dated 03.05 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2023 (HC)

Sri Rai Bahadur Seth Shreeram Narasingadas Pvt Ltd Vs. The Union Of In ...

Court : Karnataka

..... pune municipal corp. v. promoters and a builders assn. this court held that the development control rules framed under the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 had statutory force. on the other hand the circulars issued by the municipal commissioner were simply executive instructions. the circulars, therefore, could not ..... e-auction conducted by the state government and that the government of india had transferred all statutory permissions including permissions under section 2 of fc act on the recommendation made by the state government. in furtherance to the said contention the petitioners therein had produced proceedings of the government of karnataka ..... to government, forest, ecology and environment department, karnataka government secretariat, bengaluru evidencing the fact of central government according approval under section 2 of fc act, 1980 for diversion of forest land for the purpose of mining in favour of sri.srinivasulu. he also referred to a communication dated 03.05 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2023 (HC)

Rajesh S/o Yallappa Totaganti Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... ;17. a careful reading of the aforesaid definition of the word attested would show that the essential conditions of a valid attestation under section 3 of the transfer of property act are: (i) two or more witnesses have seen the executant sign the instrument of have received from him a personal acknowledgement of his signature; (ii) with a view ..... them along with the sellers and the purchaser of the subject sale deeds.16. at this stage, it would be appropriate to notice section 3 of the transfer of property act, 1882 which defines the word attested , which states as under: attested , in relation to an instrument, means and shall be deemed always to have meant attested by two ..... also appended to the petition. a perusal at the sale deed would indicate that the petitioner is an attesting witness to the sale deed. except this allegation of the petitioner acting as an attesting witness - 5 - nc:2023. khc-d:10666 crl.p no.100659 of 2023 and a friend of accused no.1, there is no other allegation .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //