Court : Supreme Court of India
..... neighbourhood school 8, no denial of admission 9 and prohibition of physical punishment and mental harassment 10, are some of the heartwarming provisions of the act.20. the act sets down certain norms and standards which have to be followed in elementary schools, and this is with the purpose of providing a meaningful and ..... relax the minimum qualifications prescribed by the academic authority , under certain circumstances and for a limited period. the academic authority under section 23(1) of the act is the national council for teachers education (ncte), which brought a notification on 23.08.2010, laying down the necessary qualifications for teachers, both at primary ..... made by the central government, a state government, a local or other authority, immediately before the commencement of the national council for teacher education (amendment) act, 2011 (18 of 2011) solely on the ground of non-fulfilment of such qualifications as may be specified by the council: provided further that the minimum .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... when her mother was absent and threatened her with criminal intimidation. thereby he has committed the offence punishable under sections 376 of ipc and section 6 of the pocso act apart from section 506 of ipc?.2. whether the judgment of the trial court call for interference.?.10. as i stated above, the prosecution to prove its case ..... , the trial court found the accused guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under sections 376(3) and 506(b) of ipc and section 6 of the pocso act and it is under challenge.6. learned counsel for the appellant contended mainly that there is a delay in lodging the complaint and as per the prosecution witnesses, the ..... completion of investigation, the police filed the charge sheet for the offences punishable under sections 376, 506(b) of ipc and sections 4, 6 and 8 of the pocso act.5. the charges were framed against the accused and he has denied the charge sheet. accordingly, the prosecution to prove its case, examined 20 witnesses and got marked 13 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and permitted assigns) and (2) m/s fujian longking co. ltd.(the second party, ie, the associates), a company incorporated under the company's act 1956, having its registered office at no.81, lingyuan road, xinluo district, longyan city, fujian province pr china a company incorporated under business license no. ..... a company registered under3the provisions of the companies act, 1956, having its registered office at: elphinstone building, 10 veer nariman road mumbai - 400 001 also having a branch office at no.71 cunningham road ..... road xinluo district longyan city fujian province, pr china. 5 . telangana state power generation company ltd., a company registered under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its corporate office at: vidyut soudha tsgenco, khairatabad hyderabad, telangana 500 082 rep. by its managing director. 6 . tata consulting engineers limited .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... incriminating circumstances against him, provides an additional circumstance in the chain of circumstantial evidence against him as contemplated under the provision of 106 of indian evidence act. since the incriminating circumstances which will be within his special knowledge and failure to discharge onus which lies on accused under the said provision is an ..... judgment rendered in the case of neeraj dutta v. state (nct of delhi) reported in (2023) 4 scc731elaborately discussed in respect of section 6 of the evidence act and discussed about the 'evidence' meaning, scope and kinds of principles elucidated and held that (i) 'evidence' is the medium through which the court is convinced ..... of the incident. according to pw.3, a panchayath was held in connection with the said aspect of the matter and accused no.2 by confessing her act of illicit relationship, promised pw.3 and others that she will not continue the same. further, pw.1 also categorically deposed about the illicit relationship of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... incriminating circumstances against him, provides an additional circumstance in the chain of circumstantial evidence against him as contemplated under the provision of 106 of indian evidence act. since the incriminating circumstances which will be within his special knowledge and failure to discharge onus which lies on accused under the said provision is an ..... judgment rendered in the case of neeraj dutta v. state (nct of delhi) reported in (2023) 4 scc731elaborately discussed in respect of section 6 of the evidence act and discussed about the 'evidence' meaning, scope and kinds of principles elucidated and held that (i) 'evidence' is the medium through which the court is convinced ..... of the incident. according to pw.3, a panchayath was held in connection with the said aspect of the matter and accused no.2 by confessing her act of illicit relationship, promised pw.3 and others that she will not continue the same. further, pw.1 also categorically deposed about the illicit relationship of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... appellant in the instant case are concerned, it is relevant to refer the suicide - meaning thereof - "sui" means "self" and "cide" means "killing", thus, implying an act of self-killing. in short a person committing suicide must commit it by himself, irrespectively of the means employed by him in achieving his object of killing himself. this issue ..... crl.a no.500 of 2018 burden could not be shifted on the accused by pressing into service the provisions contained in section 106 of the indian evidence act, 1872. these are all the reliance placed by the learned counsel for seeking intervention and to set aside the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence ..... to her death with means of some ligature material. pw.13 and pw.14, who are the sisters of deceased girijamma, stated in their evidence relating to the act of the accused and causing death of the deceased girijamma. but, in the cross examination, they stated that the deceased was suffering from some sickness and stomach pain .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... passed. order the petition is dismissed. the pending investigation shall be carried out by the inspector, cen police, belagavi as per section 78 of the information technology act, 200 by an inspector of police and file appropriate report in accordance with law. the observations made by this court during the course of this order shall not ..... anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), a police officer not below the rank of inspector shall investigate any offence under this act.11. on careful consideration of the language and wordings employed in the said section by the legislature, it is crystal clear that there is no bar to ..... of the case.6. in view of the rival contentions of the parties, this court perused the material on record meticulously.7. section 66e of the information technology act, 2000 reads as under:"66e. punishment for violation of privacy whoever, intentionally or knowingly captures, publishes or transmits the image of a private area of any person .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... industries and public enterprises with government of india having shares with 93.69%. the respondent was incorporated as hindustan machine tools private limited, under the-then companies act of 1913 and 3 later on, its name was changed as hindustan machine tools and subsequently it has been called as hmt limited.3. the respondent establishment ..... between the said percentage, the concerned officer can calculate the damages, looking to the facts and circumstances of each case.19. section 7q of the epf act 1952 also deals with payment of interest for default in depositing of the contribution of the employees. under the said section, the legislation has mandated the concerned ..... uchchatar madhyamik vidyalaya vs. the regional provident fund commissioner and another3 rendered on 24.03.2023, it is held that under section 14b of the epf act, discretion power is given to the officer to impose the percentage of damages when the employer has defaulted in payment of contribution or there were arrears of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... , adv., for c/r) this commercial appeal/comap is filed under section131) of the commercial courts, commercial division and commercial appellate division of high courts act, 2015 read with section371)(b) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, praying to allow the present appeal and consequently set aside impugned order dated21t april, 2023 passed by the lxxxv addl. city civil and sessions ..... sri. chandrashekar patil, adv.,) this comap/commercial appeal is filed under section131) of the commercial courts, commercial division and commercial appellate division of high courts act, 2015 r/w section371)(b) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, praying to call for lower court records in comm.a.a.no.201/2021, filed before the hon'ble court of the lxxxv addl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... relied upon the judgment reported in air2010sc2777in the case of satheedevi vs prasanna and another wherein also discussed with regard to the court fees and suit valuation act. the determination of market value of property and when the suit for cancellation of document which creates any right, title or interest in immovable property, value ..... air2014sc1286in the case of polamrasetti manikyam and another vs teegala venkata ramayya and another wherein also the apex court while considering the court fees and suit valuation act, discussed with regard to the expression value of property cannot be substituted with expression market value of property, suit for cancellation of sale deed is ..... vs girija prasad gupta wherein this court also discussed with regard to the cause of action consists of bundle of facts, it must inter alia, include some act done by the defendant.11. the counsel also relied upon the judgment of the apex court reported in (1980) 1 scc616in the case of meenakshisundaram chettiar .....
Tag this Judgment!