Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 9 of about 626 results (0.111 seconds)

Jan 28 2014 (SC)

Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... | | | | | |sitio| | | | | | | | | |n | | sd/-l.a.c. 15.09.2008 11. hence, the declaration made by the government for acquisition of land of the appellant under section 6 of the act does not provide any reason for arriving at a decision contrary to that of the report produced by the land acquisition collector. therefore, the basic protection to which the landowners ..... in an unauthorized manner without getting any permission either under the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 or under the relevant municipal laws. even then in some cases, relief was granted by releasing some portion of the land under ..... the development and utilization of the land as residential and commercial purposes. the notification was issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (in short the act ) and the land acquisition collector, urban estate, faridabad, haryana was authorized to issue public notice on the substance of notification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2013 (SC)

Manohar La Vs. the Principle Secretary and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... or the accused being able to manipulate circumstances to his or her advantage.25. in this light, the interplay between section 6a of the act and a constitutional court monitored investigation should be such as to protect senior government officials from frivolous and vexatious complaints and at the same time prevent ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and 2. such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and (b) such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2013 (SC)

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. the Principle Secretary and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... or the accused being able to manipulate circumstances to his or her advantage.25. in this light, the interplay between section 6a of the act and a constitutional court monitored investigation should be such as to protect senior government officials from frivolous and vexatious complaints and at the same time prevent ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and 2. such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and (b) such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2013 (SC)

Suresh Kumar Koushal and anr. Vs. Naz Foundation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... state). sexual intimacy is a core aspect of human experience and is important to mental health, psychological well being and social adjustment. by criminalising sexual acts engaged in by homosexual men, they are denied this fundamental human experience while the same is allowed to heterosexuals. the section exposed homosexual persons to ..... as it criminalises activity practiced more often by men or women who are homosexually active. the evidence that refutes the assumption that non- procreative sexual acts are unnatural includes socio-scientific and anthropological evidence and also the natural presence of homosexuality in society at large. (iii) that private, consensual sexual ..... ) 5 scc447 tamil nadu electricity board v. status spinning mills (2008) 7 scc353and seema silk and sarees v. directorate of enforcement (2008) 5 scc580 16.5 that section 377 ipc is gender neutral and covers voluntary acts of carnal intercourse against the order of nature irrespective of the gender of the persons .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2013 (SC)

Rajeshwar Singh Vs. Subrata Roy Sahara and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... interference and the present letter dated 05.05.2011 intending to cause embarrassment to the applicant and detract him from the ongoing investigation is clearly an act of interference that would jeopardize the ongoing investigation and thus hamper the petitioner from carrying out the directions of this hon ble court. 12 that ..... input, the directorate of enforcement had initiated discreet enquiries against m/s. sahara corporation and m/s. sahara india for alleged violation of foreign exchange management act, 1999. this investigation is handled by the present applicant, who made several enquiries with number of banks by issuing directives on 23.07.2010 and 28 ..... initiates the contempt proceedings in exercise of the powers conferred under article 129 read with article 142 of the constitution, irrespective of the provisions of the act and the rules to regulate proceedings for contempt of the supreme court, 1975. learned senior counsel placed considerable reliance on the judgment of this court in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2013 (SC)

T.C. Gupta Vs. Bimal Kumar Dutta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... event his explanations were to be found unacceptable. the explanation to section 12 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, makes it clear that an apology tendered by a contemnor should not be rejected merely on the ground that it is qualified or conditional so long it is ..... contemnor guilty of commission of contempt by understanding the order dated 18.08.2011 to mean status quo or a restraint in respect of grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975.11. in an earlier part of the present order, we have noticed the unqualified and unconditional apology tendered by the appellant before the high court in the ..... in which he had understood the order dated 18.08.2011, namely, that the said order had not placed any kind of prohibition on grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975. yet, out of deference to the order of high court, no licence either for group housing or commercial activities in either sector 63-a or 67-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (SC)

Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... earliest point of time and not after the conclusion of evidence and arguments, particularly, on the eve of pronouncement of judgment. in administering justice, judges should be able to act impartially, objectively and without any bias. the only thing which, according to us, is that the special judge has committed an error that after granting time for arguments, ..... the appellant that he may not get fair and impartial trial, it is relevant to point out that cognizance of various offences punishable under the ipc and the pc act was taken against the accused persons in the year 1997 and charges were framed against them in the year 2000. it is further seen that the prosecution took ..... , cbi (ahd), ranchi in the year 1997 and the charges were framed in the year 2000 in respect of various offences punishable under the ipc and the pc act. the prosecution started its arguments and concluded on 10.12.2012 and the arguments advanced on behalf of 43 out of 45 accused persons got concluded on 25.02 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2013 (SC)

State Bank of India Thr. General Manager Vs. National Housing Bank and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... housing bank (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff ) a statutory corporation created by an act of parliament (act no.53 of 1987) filed two suits, one invoking the original jurisdiction of bombay high court (suit no.211 of 1995) and another before ..... procedure of special court in civil matters.---(1) on and from the commencement of the special court (trial of offences relating to transactions in securities) amendment act, 1994, the special court shall exercise all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable, immediately before such commencement, by any civil court in relation ..... and the present litigation revolves around the second defendant (since deceased) - one harshad s. mehta (a notified person under section 3(2) of the act). the scandal exposes the shortcomings and loopholes in the administration of banking sector of this country, more particularly, the state-owned/controlled banks.6. the national .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2013 (SC)

Haryana State Indusl.Devt.Corp.Ltd. Vs. Udal and ors.Etc.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... contained in this judgment.36. maruti udyog limited shall be free to file an appropriate application before the high court for its impleadment or grant of leave to act as intervenot in the appeals filed by the parties. if such an application is filed, the same shall be decided on its own merits.37. the state ..... further argued that if the object of the acquisition was to benefit maruti udyog limited, the government should have resorted to the provisions contained in part vii of the act and its failure to do so should be treated as sufficient for quashing the acquisition proceedings in their entirety. in support of this argument, learned counsel relied upon ..... to compensation at the rate of rs.28,15,849 per acre with all statutory benefits.16. in the appeals filed by them under section 54 of the act, the landowners prayed for further enhancement in the amount of compensation. hsiidc also challenged the judgments of the reference court and prayed that the amount of compensation awarded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2012 (SC)

Surinder Singh Brar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... one of the appellants in the appeal arising out of slp (c) nos.13518-13521/2011 filed an application under the right to information act, 2005 (rti act) and sought information on various issues which had direct bearing on the acquisition of their land. senior town planner-cum-central public information officer, ..... under the impugned notification is incomprehensible and cannot be justified. the details of the notifications issued under sections 4 and 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 whereunder land has earlier been acquired by chandigarh administration in village manimajra, district chandigarh but large chunks whereof are still lying unutilized or ..... and proposed development will certainly damage the ecology of sukhna choe catchments area.(c) this acquisition is against the provisions of the forest (conservation) act, 1980, which does not allow deforestation leading to environmental deterioration.(d) the chandigarh administration has not obtained permission of the government of india for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //